Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Dannie Ginsburg
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 05:42:13PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: > Ben Collins said: > >> /bin/su is chown root.root and file permissions are correct. > > > >What are the file permissions? > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22992 Mar 14 08:28 /bin/su > chmod u+s /bin/su -- The last time somebody

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread David Wright
Quoting Bart Szyszka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > *ridiculous* (your word) to download all the development packages in > > Debian (grep-available lists 358 here) on the off-chance that someday > > they might want to compile code for a Beowulf cluster or a voxel > > renderer or what have you. You don

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 12:18:52PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I ended up just adding sysadmin to staff, then > > > >% /bin/chgrp staff /bin/su; /bin/chmod 4750 /bin/su > > Make sure you let suidmanager know about that (using suidregister) or > you might

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Colin Watson
Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I ended up just adding sysadmin to staff, then > >% /bin/chgrp staff /bin/su; /bin/chmod 4750 /bin/su Make sure you let suidmanager know about that (using suidregister) or you might find /bin/su's permissions changing back next time you upgrade the login pac

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Brian Clark
Oki DZ said: >I already have everything (for compiling) on my system; gcc works fine. It >just happens that cpp is not needed for recompiling the kernel. But quite >long ago, "apt-get install gcc" was the first thing I did before >recompiling the kernel. > >Try to: apt-get update. I had to chang

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Oki DZ
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Brian Clark wrote: > And then, of course, when you actually go to grab gcc or g++ it fails with > a 404: [err. msgs. deleted] okidz:/home/okidz# apt-get -s install gcc Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be insta

RE: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Oki DZ
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Bart Szyszka wrote: > only said something to the effect of "get gcc" for "What do I need to > compile programs"? That's horrendously absurd! gcc is not the only thing > you need to "compile programs". IMHO, it's not horrendously absurd. It's not even absurd. Yes, gcc is not

RE: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Oki DZ
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Bart Szyszka wrote: > Can we *please* get a serious answer to this question? Sure. >I've tried to find it > numerous times without any luck and it's ridiculous. The beauty of Debian > is that you can install a clean, unbloated system that's easy to maintain. > However, one

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Brian Clark
Bart Szyszka said: >> Why don't you get the package tasksel (for potato) and look for >> yourself? >> Besides, this is what the task-devel-* packages (again from potato) are >> for; they're probably the best answer to your question. > >Thanks! That sounds like exactly what I needed. > >> >And ple

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong
Well, it's a bit difficult to say what you need to compile ANY program. Of course you need the compiler, probably make, and a few other helper apps. So start with task-c-dev, if you're using potato. It will cover the basics. Then you will need -dev packages, which is what many people forget. If

RE: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Bart Szyszka
> Why don't you get the package tasksel (for potato) and look for > yourself? > Besides, this is what the task-devel-* packages (again from potato) are > for; they're probably the best answer to your question. Thanks! That sounds like exactly what I needed. > >And please don't give me ridiculous a

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Brian Clark
Colin Watson said: >Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 05:42:13PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: >>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22992 Mar 14 08:28 /bin/su >> >>There's the problem. Somehow you got the perms changed. They need to be: >> >>-rwsr-xr-x >> >>So, "chmod 4755 /b

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Colin Watson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [attribution lost] >> a). >> This has to have been asked a million times, but I can't find >> anything in the archives related to this topic: What packages do I >> need to fetch to be able to compile most software (i.e. Apache, X >> apps, etc.)? > >Can we *please* get a

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Brad
Please set your mailer to generate lines <76 characters long. On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Bart Szyszka wrote: > > a). > > This has to have been asked a million times, but I can't find anything in > > the archives related to this topic: What packages do I need to fetch to be > > abl

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Colin Watson
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 05:42:13PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22992 Mar 14 08:28 /bin/su > >There's the problem. Somehow you got the perms changed. They need to be: > >-rwsr-xr-x > >So, "chmod 4755 /bin/sh" and all should be well.

RE: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Bart Szyszka
> a). > This has to have been asked a million times, but I can't find anything in > the archives related to this topic: What packages do I need to fetch to be > able to compile most software (i.e. Apache, X apps, etc.)? Can we *please* get a serious answer to this question? I've tried to find it

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Oki DZ
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Brian Clark wrote: > This has to have been asked a million times, but I can't find anything in > the archives related to this topic: What packages do I need to fetch to be > able to compile most software (i.e. Apache, X apps, etc.)? The information is not available on the

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-30 Thread Brad
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 05:11:06PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: > > a). > > This has to have been asked a million times, but I can't find anything in > the archives related to this topic: What packages do I need to fetch to be > able to compile most software (i.e. Apache, X apps, etc.)? You'll ne

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-29 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 05:42:13PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: > Ben Collins said: > > >> % su > >> su: Authentication failure > >> Sorry > >> % > >> > >> When I _know_ I have given the right password. Caps Lock is off, I've > tried > >> typing it plain text so I know the input is correct, I

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-29 Thread Brian Clark
Ben Collins said: >> % su >> su: Authentication failure >> Sorry >> % >> >> When I _know_ I have given the right password. Caps Lock is off, I've tried >> typing it plain text so I know the input is correct, I've logged in as root >> and changed root's passwd and it still doesn't work when su-

Re: Su && Development Packages

2000-03-29 Thread Ben Collins
> % su > su: Authentication failure > Sorry > % > > When I _know_ I have given the right password. Caps Lock is off, I've tried > typing it plain text so I know the input is correct, I've logged in as root > and changed root's passwd and it still doesn't work when su-ing from a > normal user ac

Re: Su && Development Packages (Correction)

2000-03-29 Thread Brian Clark
Brian Clark said: >Greetings, > >I'm running Potato, which was installed from base floppies. > >a). > >This has to have been asked a million times, but I can't find anything in >the archives related to this topic: What packages do I need to fetch to be >able to compile most software (i.e. Apache,