Re: Streaming audio

2004-09-17 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:29:11 -0500, Michael Satterwhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > > Don't expect the situation to change soon, this is the microsoft old > > tactic to lock-in users... > > And they are *SO* good at it. :( > > We are near the point that we can get people away from Wi

Re: Streaming audio

2004-09-17 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 17 September 2004 14:21, Andrea Vettorello wrote: > > Like it or not, if we want to get people to consider using an OS other > > than Windows, it's going to have to be possible for them to use tools > > that are compatible with what they're u

Re: Streaming audio

2004-09-17 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:02:43 -0500, Michael Satterwhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Friday 17 September 2004 12:25, Silvan wrote: > > > A lot of websites with streaming audio use the Windows Media Format for > > > their streams. How can these

Re: Streaming audio

2004-09-17 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 17 September 2004 12:25, Silvan wrote: > > A lot of websites with streaming audio use the Windows Media Format for > > their streams. How can these be listened to (live) from Linux. Surely > > *SOMEONE* has solved this. > > We have lots of th

Re: Streaming audio

2004-09-17 Thread Silvan
> A lot of websites with streaming audio use the Windows Media Format for > their streams. How can these be listened to (live) from Linux. Surely > *SOMEONE* has solved this. We have lots of things to try, but in my experience Windows media stuff is a lost cause. If it isn't Real Player or MP3,

Re: Streaming audio

2004-09-17 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:07:44 -0500, Michael Satterwhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > A lot of websites with streaming audio use the Windows Media Format for their > streams. How can these be listened to (live) from Linux. Surely *SOMEONE* has > s

Re: streaming audio? (Re: wav <-> conversion utility)

1999-12-10 Thread Nathan E Norman
On 10 Dec 1999, Colin Marquardt wrote: : * Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : [gogo] : > You use the -b switch to specify the minimum bitrate, or the VBR code : > might get too agressive during "easy" portions of the WAV file. : : Where did you find that info? I read the doc

Re: streaming audio? (Re: wav <-> conversion utility)

1999-12-10 Thread Colin Marquardt
* Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [gogo] > You use the -b switch to specify the minimum bitrate, or the VBR code > might get too agressive during "easy" portions of the WAV file. Where did you find that info? > I use -v -b 112 as suggested in the docs, works well here. Hmm, the docs

Re: streaming audio? (Re: wav <-> conversion utility)

1999-12-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
On 8 Dec 1999, Colin Marquardt wrote: : * Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : > The fastest LAME-spinoff I know is href="http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~shigeo/soft/gogo2/";> GOGO , : > that is optimized by using 3DNow, MMX and ISSE assembler. About 4 times : > faster than LAME

Re: streaming audio? (Re: wav <-> conversion utility)

1999-12-08 Thread Colin Marquardt
* Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The fastest LAME-spinoff I know is href="http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~shigeo/soft/gogo2/";> GOGO , > that is optimized by using 3DNow, MMX and ISSE assembler. About 4 times > faster than LAME at the same quality. Why does it say I should combin

Re: streaming audio? (Re: wav <-> conversion utility)

1999-12-08 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Frank Barknecht wrote: > aphro hat gesagt: // aphro wrote: > > > On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, byoung wrote: > > > > b- >i tried to get the LAME, but wasn't able to. i'll try that again. > > > > its a good player, and check into not-lame its a breakoff(?) of lame, > > and has a differen

Re: streaming audio? (Re: wav <-> conversion utility)

1999-12-08 Thread Frank Barknecht
aphro hat gesagt: // aphro wrote: > On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, byoung wrote: > > b- >i tried to get the LAME, but wasn't able to. i'll try that again. > > its a good player, and check into not-lame its a breakoff(?) of lame, > and has a different homepage, although the lame page links to it. The fastest

Re: streaming audio? (Re: wav <-> conversion utility)

1999-12-06 Thread aphro
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, byoung wrote: b- >i tried to get the LAME, but wasn't able to. i'll try that again. its a good player, and check into not-lame its a breakoff(?) of lame, and has a different homepage, although the lame page links to it. b- >btw, to provide streaming audio (i.e., realaudio, u