Re: Strange network performance

2001-09-24 Thread Robert Waldner
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:12:16 BST, Matthew Sackman writes: >Ah ha! >Things are not as bad as they seem. > >If I do cat /dev/zero | nc -u -p 1666 doris.namkas 1666 >and set up doris.namkas to receive correctly then knetload reports >around 98000KBit/s which doesn't seem too bad. > >Doing it the

Re: Strange network performance

2001-09-24 Thread Matthew Sackman
Ah ha! Things are not as bad as they seem. If I do cat /dev/zero | nc -u -p 1666 doris.namkas 1666 and set up doris.namkas to receive correctly then knetload reports around 98000KBit/s which doesn't seem too bad. Doing it the other way round reports the same (ish, though in this case, the sendi

Re: Strange network performance

2001-09-24 Thread Matthew Sackman
Ok people, do not use the drivers from scyld - ONLY use the modified ones in the 2.4 kernels. I say this because having compiled and installed the ones from scyld I've had many lockups and the network just seems to die - you can still ping your own network card, but nothing else is available. Low

Re: Strange network performance

2001-09-23 Thread Robert Waldner
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:12:43 BST, Matthew Sackman writes: >Well, that's all gone through and worked - not quite as simple as I >thought, but I got there. Network performance seems a little faster >than before but still a little slow compared with what I thought >would have been possible with a 10

Re: Strange network performance

2001-09-23 Thread Jason Boxman
support 100/full all that well (in general not just under linux) and they > actually perform better when set to 100/half. > > Charles > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Matthew Sackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Noah Meyerhans&q

Re: Strange network performance

2001-09-23 Thread Charles Franks
perform better when set to 100/half. Charles - Original Message - From: "Matthew Sackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Noah Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian User List" Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 2:12 PM Subject: Re: Strange network performance Well,

Re: Strange network performance

2001-09-23 Thread Matthew Sackman
Well, that's all gone through and worked - not quite as simple as I thought, but I got there. Network performance seems a little faster than before but still a little slow compared with what I thought would have been possible with a 100TX crossover network. Must be a limitation of the cheap cards.

Re: Strange network performance

2001-09-23 Thread Matthew Sackman
Yes, it's a 2.4.9 kernel on both machines with the included natsemi driver. dmesg reports much the same for both machines: eth0: link is back. Enabling watchdog. eth0: Setting full-duplex based on negotiated link capability. eth0: Link changed: Autonegotiation advertising 05e1 partner . eth0

Re: Strange network performance

2001-09-23 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 06:36:05PM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote: > I've just set up a 100TX network with 2 computer both running debian. > Netgear FA311 cards and a single cross-over cable. What version of the kernel are you running? If it's 2.4, are you running the natsemi driver included with t