Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-04-03 Thread Jacob S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:44:11 -0600 anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 25 March 2006 09:24 pm, Jacob S wrote: > [snip] > > > > # ping longbow.arroway.com -c 1 -M do -s 1472 > > > > PING longbow.arroway.com (66.252.129.166) 1472(1500)

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-27 Thread Thilo Six
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 anoop aryal schrieb am 26.03.2006 06:44: > hope that clears it up for you. let me know if you have questions. Yup it does. Thanks a lot cause I had look a lot for some deep insight of this mtu/mtr thing. Thanks for enlighten me up. :D bye

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-25 Thread anoop aryal
On Saturday 25 March 2006 09:24 pm, Jacob S wrote: [snip] > > > # ping longbow.arroway.com -c 1 -M do -s 1472 > > > PING longbow.arroway.com (66.252.129.166) 1472(1500) bytes of data. > > > From pool-71-244-52-50.dllstx.fios.verizon.net (71.244.52.50) > > > icmp_seq=1 Frag needed and DF set (mtu =

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-25 Thread Jacob S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:49:56 -0500 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 24 March 2006 07:55, Jacob S wrote: > > > >So then I added the line > >pty "/usr/sbin/pppoe -I eth0 -T 80 -m 1464" > >to /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider, but the probl

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-25 Thread Jacob S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:33:07 -0600 anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 24 March 2006 06:55 am, Jacob S wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:35:20 -0600 > > > > anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:5

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-25 Thread Jacob S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:33:28 -0500 Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jacob S wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:53:17 +0100 > > jmt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > So, this proble

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-24 Thread Marty
Jacob S wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:53:17 +0100 jmt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, this problem has me stumped. I've tried playing around with the > PPPoe options in /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider, and re-ran pppoeconf a > couple times, but I can

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 24 March 2006 07:55, Jacob S wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:35:20 -0600 > >anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote: >> > > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > > >Hash: SHA1 >> > > >

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-24 Thread anoop aryal
On Friday 24 March 2006 06:55 am, Jacob S wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:35:20 -0600 > > anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote: > > > > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > > >Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > > >Howdy list, > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-24 Thread Jacob S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:35:20 -0600 anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote: > > > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > >Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > >Howdy list, > > > > > > > >I recently changed IS

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-23 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:35, anoop aryal wrote: >On Thursday 23 March 2006 01:13 pm, Jacob S wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:27:26 -0500 >> >> Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote: >> > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > >Hash: SHA1

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-23 Thread anoop aryal
On Thursday 23 March 2006 01:13 pm, Jacob S wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:27:26 -0500 > > Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote: > > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > >Hash: SHA1 > > > > > >Howdy list, > > > > > >I recently changed ISPs,

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-23 Thread Jacob S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:27:26 -0500 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Howdy list, > > > >I recently changed ISPs, away from static ips on

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-23 Thread Jacob S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:53:17 +0100 jmt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, this problem has me stumped. I've tried playing around with the > > PPPoe options in /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider, and re-ran pppoeconf a > > couple times, but I can't get aro

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-23 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Howdy list, > >I recently changed ISPs, away from static ips on a dsl line to a > single dynamic ip on Veriz*n's new Fi*S (fiber optic) service. The > new service uses PPPoe - not a problem, or so I t

Re: Strange PPPoe problem

2006-03-23 Thread jmt
> So, this problem has me stumped. I've tried playing around with the > PPPoe options in /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider, and re-ran pppoeconf a > couple times, but I can't get around the e-mail freeze. Does anybody > else know what might cause a problem like this? > > TIA, > Jacob Try this in your d