Re: Status of Testing

2003-03-25 Thread Travis Crump
Bill Moseley wrote: On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Travis Crump wrote: Bill Moseley wrote: Can someone fill me in on the status of Testing -- I have not updated my Testing/Unstable machine for a while (IIRC the glibc issue??). The glibc issue is resolved, if you upgrade now than you will probably upgrade

Re: Status of Testing

2003-03-25 Thread James D Strandboge
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:17, Bill Moseley wrote: > Can someone fill me in on the status of Testing -- I have not updated my > Testing/Unstable machine for a while (IIRC the glibc issue??). > > On my desktop and development machines I have a mix of testing and > unstable packages. I've needed the

Re: Status of Testing

2003-03-24 Thread Bill Moseley
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Travis Crump wrote: > Bill Moseley wrote: > > Can someone fill me in on the status of Testing -- I have not updated my > > Testing/Unstable machine for a while (IIRC the glibc issue??). > > > > The glibc issue is resolved, if you upgrade now than you will probably > upgrade

Re: Status of Testing

2003-03-24 Thread Travis Crump
Bill Moseley wrote: Can someone fill me in on the status of Testing -- I have not updated my Testing/Unstable machine for a while (IIRC the glibc issue??). The glibc issue is resolved, if you upgrade now than you will probably upgrade on the order of 100-200 packages depending on how many were al

Re: Status of Testing

2003-03-24 Thread Bill Wohler
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone fill me in on the status of Testing -- I have not updated my > Testing/Unstable machine for a while (IIRC the glibc issue??). I said "Damn the torpedoes" and went ahead and upgraded. So far I haven't noticed any problems. I run a testing mach