This is more of a repost.
Is there anyone packaging statically-linked executables so that one
doesn't worry about shared libraries? I'm thinking something like a
single set-up file which will then install to the intended locations
without the worry about dependencies.
malebo
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> There are very good reasons for using dynamic linking whenever possible.
And there are even better reasons for using a little intelligence regarding
when to dynamically link something, and when not to. Unfortunately, being
a di
On 10/11/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there anyone packaging statically-linked executables so that one doesn't
> > worry about shared libraries? I'm thinking something like a single set-up
> > file whic
Quoting Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
Is there anyone packaging statically-linked executables so that one doesn't
worry about shared libraries? I'm thinking something like a single set-up
file which will then install to the intended locations without the worry
about dependenc
4 matches
Mail list logo
