On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:50:02PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >Just curious: why not amd64? I'm running it on my Athlon64 3800+. The
> >_only_ thing I need 32-bit for is adobe flashplayer, for which I run a
> >chroot for the browser. That problem is fixed in Lenny
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Just curious: why not amd64? I'm running it on my Athlon64 3800+. The
_only_ thing I need 32-bit for is adobe flashplayer, for which I run a
chroot for the browser. That problem is fixed in Lenny/Sid but I didn't
want to go that route. After having done it, setting
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:48:40PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> >Mike Robinson wrote:
> >>I'm almost to the point of blowing the system away and installing
> >>Etch. Anyone with insight would be appreciated.
> >
> >Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think
> >I'd like to
Mike Robinson wrote:
I'm almost to the point of blowing the system away and installing
Etch. Anyone with insight would be appreciated.
Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
like to boot with an Etch install CD, keep my partitions, but blow away
the Debian Te
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:07:59PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> if you are only installing the tasksel selections and not adding
> additional software, then there is no reason to do this. I just know
> that if I had to reinstall my current machine, I'd want to pull a list
> of what was in
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:28:07PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:04:58PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
>>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Mike Robinson wrote:
> Well,
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:04:58PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
Mike Robinson wrote:
Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
like to boot wit
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:04:58PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
>>> Mike Robinson wrote:
>>> Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
>>> like to boot with an Etch install
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
Mike Robinson wrote:
Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
like to boot with an Etch install CD, keep my partitions, but blow away the
Debian Testing installation with
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Mike Robinson wrote:
>> I'm almost to the point of blowing the system away and installing Etch.
>> Anyone with insight would be appreciated.
>
> Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
> like to boot
Mike Robinson wrote:
I'm almost to the point of blowing the system away and installing Etch.
Anyone with insight would be appreciated.
Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd like to
boot with an Etch install CD, keep my partitions, but blow away the Debian Tes
On 7/24/07, Mike Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I went ahead and performed the above. The compile session did crash a few
times
as usual, but the oom-killer never appeared. In fact, looking through the
logs,
it hasn't appeared since July 15th (the logs I posted earlier). So, I'm
assumin
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> Next time you compile things, start a couple of sessions (=separate
> windows):
> - vmstat 5 - to keep track of free memory and swapping
> - top - sorted so the most memory hungry processes are on top
> - tail -f /var/log/syslog - to see when oom-killer fires up
> - a co
Mike Robinson wrote:
> >According to this you're running out of memory!? At least the oom-killer
> >is (disturbingly) active before the reboot, but the messages are pretty
> >definite: your 2G swap is maxed out. That's bad and will cause all sorts
> >of problems...
> >This *could* be an unhandle
Karl,
First off, thank you very much for looking so closely at my logs! I
truly appreciate your time.
I've been running Debian testing for about a year-and-a-half. It's been
quite stable. I performed a dist-upgrade about two weeks ago. It's been
unstable since. By unstable I mean that
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 08:22:47AM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> I've been running Debian testing for about a year-and-a-half. It's been
> quite stable. I performed a dist-upgrade about two weeks ago. It's been
> unstable since. By unstable I mean that applications may crash (disappear)
> an
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:37:45PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> It has already been said, you might want to try the K7 kernel.
> I first went that route:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/07/msg00386.html
>
> Plus, it's well established that the AMD processors are
Andrei Popescu wrote:
It has already been said, you might want to try the K7 kernel.
I first went that route:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/07/msg00386.html
Plus, it's well established that the AMD processors are fully compatible
with 686 (they never would have sold a chip otherwise
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 08:22:47AM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> I've been running Debian testing for about a year-and-a-half. It's been
> quite stable. I performed a dist-upgrade about two weeks ago. It's been
> unstable since. By unstable I mean that applications may crash (disappear)
> an
On Saturday 21 July 2007 14:22:47 Mike Robinson wrote:
> I've been running Debian testing for about a year-and-a-half. It's been
> quite stable. I performed a dist-upgrade about two weeks ago. It's
> been unstable since. By unstable I mean that applications may crash
> (disappear) and the syste
20 matches
Mail list logo
