Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> I just realised: there is a 4th (or is that 5th?) option: policy based
> routing.
Ah yes. Clever. Thank you for the extra item on the list.
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Thanks for the input. I think really should give up the transparent
> approach and try to make usage of autoconfig with hope clients are able
> to understand.
Supported by at least IE, FF, and Chrome on Windows since XP, if not
earlier, and on Linux-based systems for much t
Am 28.06.2013 19:47, schrieb Karl E. Jorgensen:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:12:38PM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
>> Frank Lanitz wrote:
>>> Is there a way of using a squid proxy in transparent way [...] for SSL.
>>> If I'm entering the proxy directly into
>>> e.g. Firefox it's working -- but don't
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:12:38PM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
> Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > Is there a way of using a squid proxy in transparent way [...] for SSL.
> > If I'm entering the proxy directly into
> > e.g. Firefox it's working -- but don't got it running via transparent mode.
>
> As you'll
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:12:38 +0100
Chris Davies wrote:
> Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > Is there a way of using a squid proxy in transparent way [...] for
> > SSL. If I'm entering the proxy directly into
> > e.g. Firefox it's working -- but don't got it running via
> > transparent mode.
>
> As you'll
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Is there a way of using a squid proxy in transparent way [...] for SSL.
> If I'm entering the proxy directly into
> e.g. Firefox it's working -- but don't got it running via transparent mode.
As you'll know, it's pretty straightforward to set up a transparent
proxy for (unen
Am 26.06.2013 15:59, schrieb Karl E. Jorgensen:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:07:26PM +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> Hi folsk,
>>
>> Is there a way of using a squid proxy in transparent way, just to put
>> the traffic and forward it via another proxy to outside network(no
>> caching etc) w/o doing ma
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:07:26PM +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Hi folsk,
>
> Is there a way of using a squid proxy in transparent way, just to put
> the traffic and forward it via another proxy to outside network(no
> caching etc) w/o doing man-in-the-middle? Currently I've got this
> running for
8 matches
Mail list logo