On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:09:21AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> Hello Kev,
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:44:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I use pine and forwards are quoted inline not as attachments. So,
> > my message is like this:
> > HEADER_WITH_SPAM_AS_SUBJECT
> > BLANK_LINE
> >
Hello Kev,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:44:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I use pine and forwards are quoted inline not as attachments. So,
> my message is like this:
> HEADER_WITH_SPAM_AS_SUBJECT
> BLANK_LINE
> INLINE_FORWARD
> BLANK_LINE
> whereas with an forward'ed attachment might be li
On Mon, Oct 13 at 16:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned the following:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 at 08:08 GMT, Johann Spies penned:
>
>> These 4 options can be sorted out with procmail. I also realized
>> that the from: would be from your network and the to: wou
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 at 08:08 GMT, Johann Spies penned:
> >
> >> These 4 options can be sorted out with procmail. I also realized that
> >> the from: would be from your network and the to: would be you, also
> >> on your network, so that would diffe
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:30:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> I did not know about the '+' option. That is nice.
>
> > Now once that is done, you need to determine what to do with the 4
> > mail types: inline forward, attachment forward, inl
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 at 08:08 GMT, Johann Spies penned:
>
>> These 4 options can be sorted out with procmail. I also realized that
>> the from: would be from your network and the to: would be you, also
>> on your network, so that would differentiate it from other mails
>> using procmail. Also, you
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:30:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First I was confused by your phrase 'send me .. as attachments'
Apologies for not being clear enough.
> there are 2 formats that various mailreader use: inline and attachment. So,
> you'd have to check for both types and extrac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Johann Spies wrote:
> I administer 3 email servers which use spamassassin. We are testing
> the service with about 110 users whose email are scanned by SA.
>
> My arrangement with them is to send me either spam that scored too low
> or false positives as attachments with ei
8 matches
Mail list logo