> Those are created at boot time, by udev.
I unde5rstand.
>
> That depends on how you describe partitions in /etc/fstab. If you use
> the device name, then almost certainly yes. If you use the label or
> UUID, then no.
>
Oh, that is cool, as I am using only UUID in fstab. Thus, just clone the d
> If you simply clone the system from one hardware system to another, are
> you confident that it will work?
Yes.
>
> I expect that the two different hardware systems would require separate
> sets of drivers and configurations for those drivers.
Nope, kernel knows.
> Also, depending on the operati
Yes, this is, where the entry "i386" is put in. I remember, to execute the
command "dpkg --add-architecture i386" a very long time ago.
Thus, aptitude now knows about it.
Zhanks for making things clearer.
Best
Hans
> Indeed, multi-arch is a dpkg thing. The list of current architectures
> is k
I am wondering, why aptitude is showing me (incorrectlly?) libllvm*:i386 and
apt-get not.
I have no i386 entry in sources.list, but where does aptitude get its
information?
apt-cache search libllvm | grep i386
aptitude search libllvm | grep i386
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2024, 17:51:23 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 04:59:55PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Eben King (12024-05-27):
> > > Is there an easier way to uninstall a package and everything it brought
> > > in
> > > at one swell foop? Thanks.
> >
> > The packa
-
> From: "Nicolas George"
> To: "debian-user"
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 11:13:44 AM
> Subject: Re: *SPAM* Marking as spam [was: *SPAM* Re:
> LibreOffice removed from Debian]
> Hans (12024-04-18):
> > As I can not fix it
>
&g
rtnetz...@windstream.net (12024-04-18):
> As I understand what he wrote, the SPAM tag is added after the message leaves
> his control.
I very much doubt it, we would see “*SPAM* Re:” rather than
“Re: *****SPAM*”.
And his recent “Sorry” mail was not tagged.
https://lists.debi
As I understand what he wrote, the SPAM tag is added after the message leaves
his control.
- Original Message -
From: "Nicolas George"
To: "debian-user"
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 11:13:44 AM
Subject: Re: *SPAM* Marking as spam [was: *SPAM* Re:
Hans (12024-04-18):
> As I can not fix it
You can manually remove “*SPAM*” from the mail when you reply.
You could even automate it on your end.
--
Nicolas George
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2024, 11:53:38 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
Hi Tomas,
this is by debian servers, I talked about this for a while. Because the debian
servers mark some things in the header, megamailservers.eu mark them as spam
and add SPAM to the headline.
As I can not fix it
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:35:58 +
Andy Smith wrote:
Hello Andy,
>I suspect that your text above has come out sounding more entitled
>than you intended, as English is not your first language.
In fairness to Hans, he did go on to explain as much.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {d
Hi Hans,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Hans wrote:
> I only hope, it will not happen the same fate like usermin and webmin
> happened
> to: It was once removed from the repoi with th ereason "spagehetti code, bad
> code" and then no one ever took a look again to it, although many, m
I only hope, it will not happen the same fate like usermin and webmin happened
to: It was once removed from the repoi with th ereason "spagehetti code, bad
code" and then no one ever took a look again to it, although many, many years
of coding passed by.
And webmin and usermin are still develo
Hi,
Andy Smith wrote:
> [...] I argue that at present it
> isn't a good idea to just reject all DKIM failures like OP's mailbox
> provider appears to be doing.
Just for the records:
The mails in question don't get rejected but rather marked as spam
and then get delivered.
The currently best theo
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 02:16:07AM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> And some dkim seems setup with the intention that it should not be used
> for mailinglusts:
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=dow.land;
> s=20210720;
> h=From:In-Reply-To:References:Su
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:44:51AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> --- sninp ---
>
> Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu; spf=none
> smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
> Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu;
> dkim=fail reason="sig
On 07/03/2024 21:04, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:44:51AM +0100, Hans wrote:
--- sninp ---
Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu; spf=none
smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu;
dkim=fail reason="signature
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:44:51AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> --- sninp ---
>
> Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu; spf=none
> smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
> Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu;
> dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:44:51AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> Hi all,
> I believe, I found the reason, why mails are marked as spam and others not.
>
> All spam mails shjow this entry in the header:
>
> --- sninp ---
>
> Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu; spf=none
> smtp.mailfrom=l
Hi all,
I believe, I found the reason, why mails are marked as spam and others not.
All spam mails shjow this entry in the header:
--- sninp ---
Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu; spf=none
smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu;
Hans wrote:
> HI Brad,
>
> I do not believe, it is a training problem. Why? Well, your formerly
> mail was marked as spam. So I marked it as ham. Now, your second mail
> again is marked as spam.
>
> We know, there is nothing unusual with your mail, but it is again
> marked as spam. Even, when I
On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 15:36:25 +0100
Hans wrote:
Hello Hans,
>I do not believe, it is a training problem. Why? Well, your formerly
>mail was marked as spam. So I marked it as ham. Now, your second mail
>again is marked as spam.
Spam/ham training is not, IME, a single shot affair. However, as yo
HI Brad,
I do not believe, it is a training problem. Why? Well, your formerly mail was
marked as spam. So I marked it as ham. Now, your second mail again is marked
as spam.
We know, there is nothing unusual with your mail, but it is again marked as
spam. Even, when I explicity marked your mai
On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 13:53:49 +0100
Hans wrote:
Hello Hans,
>It should be well trained
Spam training is an ongoing process
>But until then suddenly the false positives increased from one day to
>another, although I had changed nothing.
because the spam changes. What's coming now is ne
Hans (12024-03-06):
> I am using this spamfilter now for several years. It should be well trained
> and
> almost until about 4 months I never had any problems with it.
Hi.
It is probably not the reason for you problem now, but it is important
to note that in the “several years” since your spam
Hi,
Hans wrote:
> Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Spam from the list?
> In-Reply-To: <20240306112253.55e25...@earth.stargate.org.uk>
referring the mail
> > Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:22:53 +
> > From: Brad Rogers
> > Message-ID: <20240306112253.55e25...@earth.stargate
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:53:49PM +0100, Hans wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> I am using this spamfilter now for several years. It should be well trained
> and
> almost until about 4 months I never had any problems with it.
>
> But until then suddenly the false positives increased from one day to
> ano
Hi Brad,
I am using this spamfilter now for several years. It should be well trained and
almost until about 4 months I never had any problems with it.
But until then suddenly the false positives increased from one day to another,
although I had changed nothing.
And weired: It happened only wi
Hans wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > you perhaps subscribed to one of the "Resent-*" lists ?
> >
> Not as far as I know.
>
> > > Subject: *SPAM* Bug#1065537: ITP: bleak-retry-connector --
> > > Connector for Bleak Clients that handles transient connection
> > > failures
> >
> > The mark
On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:19:27 +0100
Hans wrote:
Hello Hans,
>Does one see any reason, why this is considered as spam???
Further to what Thomas says; You haven't told your spam filtering that
it's ham. If you don't train your spam filters, it's never going to get
any better at detecting what yo
Hi,
Hans wrote:
> I changed nothing and suddenly many mails from debian-user
> (but not all, only some) are recognized as spam.
But the one you posted here did not come from debian-user.
So maybe what changed is an inadverted subscription to one of
debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
debian-de
Am Mittwoch, 6. März 2024, 12:10:57 CET schrieb Dan Ritter:
> >
> > X-Spam-Flag: YES
> >
> > X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
>
> What sets these two headers?
>
I do not know. So I asked on this list.
What I believe is, that the X-Spam-Flag: YES is set somehow on the way and as
spamassin is looking at
Hi Thomas,
> you perhaps subscribed to one of the "Resent-*" lists ?
>
Not as far as I know.
> > Subject: *SPAM* Bug#1065537: ITP: bleak-retry-connector --
> > Connector for Bleak Clients that handles transient connection failures
>
> The mark "*SPAM*" does not appear in the arc
Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> during the last moonths I get more mails from the debian-user list marked as
> spam than before. Something must have changed.
>
> I examined the header of the mails, but did not see any unusual.
>
> Below I send the header of an example of such a mail, maybe you can
Hi,
Hans wrote:
> during the last moonths I get more mails from the debian-user list marked as
> spam than before.
> [...]
> Below I send the header of an example of such a mail, maybe you can see the
> reason?
The message does not look like it came to you via debian-user:
> X-Original-To: lists
hobie, on 2019-07-20 :
> Thanks. :) I have a faint memory of inserting 'nomodeset' long years ago
> in the interest of keeping my console screen at 80x25.
>
> cat /proc/cmdline
> BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-[...] root=UUID=[...] ro nomodeset reboot=pci quiet
There
On 21 April 2017 at 03:11, Cindy-Sue Causey
wrote:
> On 4/20/17, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Patrick Bartek writes:
> >
> >> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > fc:
> >> > > Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed?
> >> >
> >> > Because this exclu
On 04/20/2017 05:52 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
wrote:
fc:
Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:52:39PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> wrote:
>
> > fc:
> > >
> > > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
> >
> > You have no idea *how much*
On 4/20/17, Ben Finney wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
>> wrote:
>>
>> > fc:
>> > > Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed?
>> >
>> > Because this excludes use cases that are deemed valid by the list
>> > masters.
>>
>> Like
Patrick Bartek writes:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> wrote:
>
> > fc:
> > > Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed?
> >
> > Because this excludes use cases that are deemed valid by the list
> > masters.
>
> Like what?
I can't speak for the list masters,
Joel Rees writes:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
>> wrote:
>>
>>> fc:
>>> >
>>> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>>>
>>> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of t
Patrick Bartek writes:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> wrote:
>
>> fc:
>> >
>> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>>
>> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
>> masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all o
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> wrote:
>
>> fc:
>> >
>> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>>
>> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
>> masters. But it's n
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
wrote:
> fc:
> >
> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>
> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
> masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost 300
> Debian lists¹ wit
On 20 April 2017 at 21:40, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> fc:
> >
> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>
> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
> masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost 300 Debian
> lists¹ with thousan
On 20/04/17 13:27, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:43:33AM +0100, Brian wrote:
>> You would have to sound out and convince the exim4 maintainers. I can
>> well imagine their enthusiasm for a change might be muted.
>
> I've reported this before, IIRC, and was ignored. There's
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:43:33AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> You would have to sound out and convince the exim4 maintainers. I can
> well imagine their enthusiasm for a change might be muted.
I've reported this before, IIRC, and was ignored. There's also a potential
DoS situation because the default c
On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 20:15:02 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> When people install Debian (or any distro), they usually get a bunch of
> entries in /etc/aliases and various system accounts (/etc/passwd entries
> with UID < 1000) created by the packages they install.
>
> I've noticed an increase in
On Saturday 10 December 2016 21:46:19 Karen Lewellen wrote:
> What favored Ubuntu help list?
You have asked an Ubuntu question on the Debian help list. I think that Cindy
is suggesting that for Ubuntu questions, an Ubuntu help-list is more
appropriate than a Debian help-list.
> I stated at the
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:27:50PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
> using Ubuntu.
> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer
> filtering at the level it did previously.
> Has something happened
Hi Karen,
> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
> using Ubuntu.
This is a Debian list but we are smart enough to differ between Ubuntu
specific problems and general question about strategies. From my point
of view I order yours into strategies.
> Has something
purposes and he refused their request then all of the spam
started.
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 12:38:18
From: Karen Lewellen
To: Jude DaShiell
Cc: Cindy-Sue Causey ,
Debian Users
Subject: Re: spam filtering question?
Hi there,
Yes I am running sa
On 2016-12-11, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>> What favored Ubuntu help list?
>> I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that
>> service.
>>
>>
>
> Never mind her, she's a fear biter. When you mentioned "ubu
Users
Subject: Re: spam filtering question?
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:47:05 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
What favored Ubuntu help list?
I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that
service.
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Cindy-Sue Causey
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> What favored Ubuntu help list?
> I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that
> service.
>
>
Never mind her, she's a fear biter. When you mentioned "ubuntu" her reflexes
kicked in.
Anywho...
Explain y
On 2016-12-10, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> What favored Ubuntu help list?
> I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that
> service.
She feels there's a creeping Ubuntu conspiracy and that seeing your
shell service uses the Ubuntu distribution, your question belongs on an
Is sa-learn being run, and if so is it no longer effective?
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:46:19
From: Karen Lewellen
To: Cindy-Sue Causey
Cc: Debian Users
Subject: Re: spam filtering question?
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:47:05 + (UTC)
Resent
What favored Ubuntu help list?
I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that
service.
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
On 12/9/16, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Greetings folks,
shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
using Ubu
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:27:50PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Greetings folks,
> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
> using Ubuntu.
> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer
> filtering at the level it did previously.
> Has
On 12/9/16, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Greetings folks,
> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
> using Ubuntu.
> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer
> filtering at the level it did previously.
> Has something happened to the pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:27:50PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Greetings folks,
> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work
> is using Ubuntu.
> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no
> longer
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:21:50 -0500
limpia wrote:
> On 2016-08-15 12:31, Account-services wrote:
> > Avoid [debian-user@lists.debian.org] suspension
> >
> Text cut, but I am sure every one has seen it,
Of course not. Those of us who use real e-mail clients don't see spam
usually. Even if it fall
Many thanks, Andreas, for you quick reply.
I "prefixed" all occurences of the ACL condition spam now with
condition = ${if < {$message_size}{10K}}
such that I have now
# from
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-content_scanning_at_acl_time.html
# put h
On 2015-03-29 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> I get from time to time this error message on my spamassassin+exim4 setup:
> 2015-03-26 20:46:22 1YbDhW-00062f-G2 spam acl condition: error reading from
> spamd socket: Connection timed out
> I suspect that on this virtual machine, sometimes there are really
On 2014-05-31, Richard Owlett wrote:
>>
>> tasksel tasksel/first seen false
>
> That's one of the failures.
> Has that worked for anyone?
I dunno.
How about:
tasksel tasksel/first multiselect standard, desktop
d-i preseed/early_command string . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule; db_get
debconf/prio
[My headache is turning into a migraine.]
On Sat 31 May 2014 at 16:20:38 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> >[Please don't shout. I've got a headache.]
> >
> >Do you think it might help if we had details of the tests done?
>
> No!
>
> Only one of the tests was relevant to my stated g
Curt wrote:
On 2014-05-27, Richard Owlett wrote:
My goal is to force the menu which asks to chose among typical
uses (i.e. Desktop|print server|laptop|etc).
Have you tried
# set the default
tasksel tasksel/first multiselect standard, desktop
# have the question asked anyway
tasksel tasksel
Brian wrote:
[Please don't shout. I've got a headache.]
On Sat 31 May 2014 at 06:35:55 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Brian wrote:
Using preseeding to set a default answer for a question but still have
the question asked is described. Is there anything there which is not
amenable to a quick te
[Please don't shout. I've got a headache.]
On Sat 31 May 2014 at 06:35:55 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> >
> >Using preseeding to set a default answer for a question but still have
> >the question asked is described. Is there anything there which is not
> >amenable to a quick test
Brian wrote:
On Tue 27 May 2014 at 08:19:24 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide
Appendix B. Automating the installation using preseeding
B.5.2. Using preseeding to change default values
AND
B.2.2. Using boot parameters to pre
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:06:00PM -0500, c. marlow wrote:
> What the heck
> Sorry I'm new to the whole group email / NEWSGROUP thing.
It was spam. Sometimes it gets through the filters. Best course of
action is to not reply to it, and *never* quote it.
Cheers,
Tom
--
Support your local Se
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:27:32 +0100
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have what seems an automated spam when I send a mail to the ml.
>
> It takes back the subject but adds it "Festival Shutdown : ". Am I the
> only one with this issue, please?
>
No, I get that too. Given the e-
You are not the only one with this problem. If it frustrates
you, please bring it to the listmasters attention.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013110
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:27:32AM CET, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org said:
> Hi.
>
> I have what seems an automated spam when I send a mail to the ml.
>
> It takes back the subject but adds it "Festival Shutdown : ". Am I
> the only one with this issue, please?
>
> Here is the exact content of
On Friday 13 September 2013 10:12 AM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:23:50AM +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700
>> Robert Holtzman wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:22:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>>snip...
Wha
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:23:50AM +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700
> Robert Holtzman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:22:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> >
> >snip...
> > >
> > > What's "no-auto-default=00:21:CC:B6:06:8F,"?!
> > >
> > > I'v
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:56 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 4/1/13, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 03:08:34PM +, Mark Peterson wrote:
> >> >
> >snip of offensive crap..
> >
> > Not only does this clueless spammer post his drivel, he does it in HT
On 4/1/13, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 03:08:34PM +, Mark Peterson wrote:
>>
>snip of offensive crap..
>
> Not only does this clueless spammer post his drivel, he does it in HTML!
For those who want to be marked _up_ in the world. More gold stars
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 03:08:34PM +, Mark Peterson wrote:
>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:14:19PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
>> On Monday 11 March 2013 00:27:39 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > (Charles Kroeger, Sun Mar 10 20:57:18 2013)
>> > I got a Kobo Arc that runs A
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:14:19PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> On Monday 11 March 2013 00:27:39 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
> wrote:
> >
> > (Charles Kroeger, Sun Mar 10 20:57:18 2013)
> > I got a Kobo Arc that runs Android 4.0.4 and would like to become su for
> > this device.
> lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
>> Camaleón wrote:
>> > It seems to be a known/reported issue:
>> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661758
>>
>> Thanks to Bob and Camaleon; patching aide works correctly. The patch is
>> at
>> the link that Camaleon gave before.
>
> Oh wow. It is a data
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:13:29 -0400, istimsak abdulbasir wrote:
> I hate spam. There is not absolute resolution to it.
I'm also so annoyed with hmtl and top-posting messages, such is life ;-P
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
I hate spam. There is not absolute resolution to it.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Clive Standbridge <
list-u...@tgstandbridges.plus.com> wrote:
> To anyone who is bothered by spam on the list and is unsure what to do,
> please:
>
> DON'T reply to the spam.
>
> DON'T quote the spam.
>
> DO Rea
Regarding to
From: Aft nix
To: Sam
Cc: [snip]
Subject: Re: The last time i got tortured...when the torture started ?
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 14:00:31 +0600
Please take a look at what Clive Standbridge wrote on Thu, 2012-05-17 at
09:51 +0100:
> To anyone who is bothered by spam on the list and is un
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 12:24 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> Finally someone contacted listmaster.
I don't expect that the listmaster simply can remove "joe" from the
list. I suspect that there's no "joe" subscribed to the list and we need
to filter those messages ourself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 27.05.2012 09:36, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Listmaster,
>
> list members receive off-list mails
>
> From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> but with
>
> Reply-to: "debian-user@lists.debian.org"
>
> with the call to post on top:
>
> "__
> Type y
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:03:40PM +0200, Tom Rausner wrote:
> I know they catch about 40,000 spams a day, but that's not the issue. I
> was just surprised to see this HTML-monster getting through.
AIUI, the filtering is set up to "err on the side of caution", IOW, it is
more important to let a po
On 17/05/12 09:51, Clive Standbridge wrote:
> To anyone who is bothered by spam on the list and is unsure what to do,
> please:
>
> DON'T reply to the spam.
>
> DON'T quote the spam.
>
> DO Read how to report the spam at
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#ads in particular, find the
> offendi
On Thursday 17 May 2012 12:03:40 Tom Rausner wrote:
> I wanted you to see how it looked like, uncut.
The problem is that that confuses the spam filter. Never quote or reply to a
spam email.
But none of us was born knowing that! ;-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:45:25AM +0200, Tom Rausner wrote:
>Hi Administrators of this list
Actually, you've reached the users of the list. As mentioned at
http://lists.debian.org, the maintainers are contactable at
listarchi...@debian.org.
>
>Don't you think this list needs a spam filt
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:45:25AM BST, Tom Rausner wrote:
> Hi Administrators of this list
>
> Don't you think this list needs a spam filter upgrade ?
>
> Look what the pig draged in (I had to send it as HTML 'cause the spam
> was HTML);
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/05/msg01666.htm
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:26:17 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Freitag, 23. September 2011 schrieb Walter Hurry:
>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:29:38 +0100, Terence wrote:
>> > On 23 September 2011 18:13, Tony van der Hoff
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 23/09/11 18:54, Walter Hurry wrote:
>> >>> And b
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:11:57 +0200
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hello Martin,
> I usually only see list spam when someone replies to it.
Same here.
> So please don´t.
*I* didn't, that was Walter. I replied to him. I should, of course,
have changed the subject at least.
--
Regards _
On Wed, 11 May 2011 14:10:31 -0700
Robert Holtzman wrote:
Hello Robert,
> I'll give it a try,thanks. Is it as effective as SA?
At least, yes. Make sure you train it plenty of good (ham) messages as
well as bad (spam).
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2011 15:15:28 -0700
> Robert Holtzman wrote:
>
> Hello Robert,
>
> > filter? I have used Spamassasin successfully for years but I have to
> > call it from Procmail and it slows downloading mail to a crawl.
>
> I use
On Tue, 10 May 2011 15:15:28 -0700
Robert Holtzman wrote:
Hello Robert,
> filter? I have used Spamassasin successfully for years but I have to
> call it from Procmail and it slows downloading mail to a crawl.
I use bogofilter. Needs to be trained, of course, but it's faster than
SA.
--
Reg
Robert Holtzman writes:
> Speaking of spam, does anyone have a recommendation for an end user
> filter? I have used Spamassasin successfully for years but I have to
> call it from Procmail and it slows downloading mail to a crawl.
I call Spamassassin from Exim but it (and Exim) run on a seperate
s
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:55:34AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Jeroen writes:
> > Has this list list been forgotten by its maintainer(s)?
>
> No. 99% (literally) of what hits the servers is spam. What you see is
> what gets past the filters. If you think you can do a better job
> volunteer. In
1 - 100 of 494 matches
Mail list logo
