"Russell S." writes:
> Chris Green writes:
>
>> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>> >
>>> > [...]
>>> >
>>> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
>>>
Chris Green writes:
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
>> > > mailing lists and various email
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:44:56AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
> > > mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:44:56AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
> > > mailing lists and vari
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> I've never seen the Usenet equivalents documented anywhere. Do you
> know what they are? Maybe something like comp.debian or
> comp.linux.debian?
As an example, on news.gmane.io this debian-user list is
gmane.linux.debian.user. If there's mirroring to general Usenet, I d
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
> > mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect
> > protocols to cross pollinate?
>
>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
[...]
> That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
> mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect
> protocols to cross pollinate?
Gateways. They live between protocols. In the concrete c
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 9:27 PM Russell S. wrote:
>
> David Wright writes:
>
> > On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote:
> >> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
> >> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
> >> un
David Wright writes:
> On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote:
>> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
>> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
>> until one finally went through and that would be it.
>>
>> So, a
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 04:45:26PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote:
> > I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
> > were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
> > until one finally went
On 7/2/25 05:20, Russell Stinnett wrote:
So, again, I apologize for the spam. I don't know of another way to test
it.
Stop it, or you will go blind...
..
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
(UTC+0800)
..
On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote:
> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
> until one finally went through and that would be it.
>
> So, again, I apologize for the spam
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 09:20:18PM +, Russell Stinnett wrote:
> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
> until one finally went through and that would be it.
>
Hi Russell,
Maybe that's lesson #
On 2024-04-18 at 11:15, Hans wrote:
> Sorry, the spam tag appears because of DCIM in the header.
>
> Not my fault.
But it did not appear on *this* message from you to the list.
Is there a reason you couldn't edit the Subject: lines of the replies
you're sending, before you send them, to remove
On Sat, 2022-11-12 at 07:27 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 07:22:19PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I think what hede was hinting at was that early SSDs had a (pretty)
> > limited number of write cycles [...]
>
> As was pointed out to me, the OP wasn't
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 7:54 AM 황병희
wrote:
> Dear Brad,
>
> On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > [...snip...]
> >>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?!
> >
> > Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's
> > guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial.
Dear Brad,
On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
> [...snip...]
>>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?!
>
> Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's
> guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial. Thus making it
> unlikely they're the same person.
Ah ye
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:58:07 +0900
황병희 wrote:
Hello 황병희,
>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?!
Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's
guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial. Thus making it
unlikely they're the same person.
--
Regards _
On Mon 02 May 2016 at 08:44:53 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into
> > the bit bucket [...]
>
> I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejec
On 05/01/2016 11:44 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
[...]
That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into
the bit bucket [...]
I doubt that part. Especially having already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
[...]
> That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into
> the bit bucket [...]
I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejects from
some Debian list due to
On 05/01/2016 10:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote:
Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit
on the site restrictions.
Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are
asked, you would get more help
On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 09:59 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> I need to re-read Gene Haskett's suggestion again and try to
> impliment
> it. Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a
> bit
> on the site restrictions.
You could probably file a bug about reject notices.
As for the
On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote:
> Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit
> on the site restrictions.
Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are
asked, you would get more help faster.
Lisi
On 05/01/2016 04:46 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
anything other than plain text files.
I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 02:07:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Wow, this one didn't came through the list, while tons of HTML spam
> does.
Ralf, the above comment was not very clever :-/
> I hope it's regarding to just a link in the message's body and not
> to the content of the link.
And suggestin
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:59:59 -0400
"Thomas H. George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Thomas,
> Sorry, I thought if I changed the subject it would start a new thread.
In mailers that ignore Reference or In-Reply-To headers, it will appear
as a new thread. Most email packages don't ignore those
Everyone,
I apologize for the duplicate post. The first time when I clicked send, I
noticed it had the wrong From: address, so I resent it with the proper one
thinking that the first one would get rejected since the other email isn't
subscribed to the list.
Sorry!!
Brad
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:54:50PM +0100, ray wrote:
> sorry this is a test as my messages don't show up
Email and usenet isn't instant. Give it four days before claiming it
didn't get there.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:12:39PM +0100, Benjamin Swatek wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:02, Dave Thayer wrote:
[...]
> > While I agree with the above, it should be pointed out that it's a
> > *lot* easier to relocate a hardware AP for better coverage than a
> > desktop machine, so if your route
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 16:42, Bret Comstock Waldow wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:03, Benjamin Swatek wrote:
>
> > I mean one of these nice little boxes which aren't more than this or can
> > I use some linux-box set up as a router which I connect to the internet
> > as an accesspoint via a wlan
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:02, Dave Thayer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:27:34AM -0500, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > Quoting Benjamin Swatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Sorry, but nether googeling nor the wlan-howto enlighted me completely
> > > and I know that this is not so debian specific, bu
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:27:34AM -0500, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> Quoting Benjamin Swatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Sorry, but nether googeling nor the wlan-howto enlighted me completely
> > and I know that this is not so debian specific, but:
> > For a home-wlan, do I realy need an accesspoint?
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:03, Benjamin Swatek wrote:
> I mean one of these nice little boxes which aren't more than this or can
> I use some linux-box set up as a router which I connect to the internet
> as an accesspoint via a wlan-pci-card? Does it need to be a special
> wlan-card?
This language
Quoting Benjamin Swatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry, but nether googeling nor the wlan-howto enlighted me completely
> and I know that this is not so debian specific, but:
> For a home-wlan, do I realy need an accesspoint?
> I mean one of these nice little boxes which aren't more than this or can
On 0, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> I tried removing some packages of kde that I don't want on my
> system. like kab and karm. However dpkg --purge tells me that there is daa
> dependency problem. apt-get remove kab shows that it is removing kde
> too.daapt-cache kde shows that it is a meta pa
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 08:32:26PM +0200, prover wrote:
> Everybody, please, excuse me for problems
>
> I was trying unsubscribe form your mailing lists, but your listmaster told
> me, that i'm not in your mailing list.
> What can I do now?
> Members from debian mailing lists are sendin to me 200
on Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 08:32 PM +0200, prover ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Everybody, please, excuse me for problems
>
> I was trying unsubscribe form your mailing lists, but your listmaster told
> me, that i'm not in your mailing list.
> What can I do now?
> Members from debian mailing lists are
On 21-Jan-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've wasted another hour or so trying to answer this simple
> question, starting at IBM's Laptop support homepage.
>
> To paraphrase somebody else, if I knew who I would give
> credit, but... I have seen a lot of progress in my lifetime of
> computing e
On 21 Jan 01 02:37:20 GMT, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>IIRC, you hit F1 during the bootstrap.
The manual I read (ThinkPad 560X) said to hold the F1 key down, power
on, and continue holding down F1 until the BIOS setup came up.
Frank
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've wasted another hour or so trying to answer this simple
> question, starting at IBM's Laptop support homepage.
>
> To paraphrase somebody else, if I knew who I would give
> credit, but... I have seen a lot of progress in my lifetime of
> computing experience, and
IIRC, you hit F1 during the bootstrap.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon 11 Dec 00, 11:36 AM, Dale Kosan said...
> Pete,
>
>
> Thanks for your help, sorry I did not know I had to watch my format of
> sentences and paragraphs.I will be more careful in the future. : )
well, you don't really have to do anything you don't want to. right now,
you're using W
%% Idimmu Xul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ix> Also would i be correct in saying that I shouldn't have gnome
ix> running while I download and install?
I've never known it to be a problem if you're using an app you upgrade
with apt-get. It Just Works.
ix> I dunno.. I just don't want to kill
Sorry, was intendet for debian-user-de
Roy-Anders Larsen wrote:
> I have an SB16PnP and I recently posted the instructions on how I did the
> sound on my system to this debian-user list, see:
> http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-user-9903/msg03187.html
> I think http://netgod.net/ has the latest kernel debs, but I don't know i
On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, O. Niepolt wrote:
> which _is_ the standard kernel for slink? Would it make sense to use 2.2
> or to use ALSA? Where could I find 2.2 kernel debs? I'm asking this
I have an SB16PnP and I recently posted the instructions on how I did the
sound on my system to this debian-user
Please check to see that lilo has the right parameters for your harddisk
Particularly the bits about Large, LBA ...
--Jonathan
> "Lil-" comes up on the screen and the system hangs
>
> (Just glad I have a recent kernel boot disk =) )
>
> /boot/boot.hda doesn't exist.
>
> I have no WinNT instal
On Sun, 10 May 1998, Tristan Day wrote:
> Thanks to all for all the help and ideas, but it still won't work: here's
> what has gone wrong:
> 'lilo -u /dev/hda' says "boot sector of /dev/hda does not have a lilo
> signature"
>
> 'lilo -u' runs fine and says that it has restored the original MBR
Sorry, that should have been:
dd if=/boot/boot.0301 of=/dev/hda bs=446 count=1
-Ossama
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
> Here's a list of the files in /boot/
[snip]
> boot.0301
[snip]
Here is what the lilo manual says:
---
LILO automatically makes backup copies when it overwrites boot sectors.
They are named /boot/boot., with corresponding to the device
number, e.g. 0300 is /dev/hda, 08
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 01:23:48PM +0100, Tristan Day wrote:
> Thanks to all for all the help and ideas, but it still won't work: here's
> what has gone wrong:
Can you state the problem again? I missed your earlier posts.
> The DOS 'fdisk /MBR' ran with no errors, but made no difference to bootup
Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 writes:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry to ask this but what is hamm,
No stupid questions, just information requests 8-)
Anyhow, to answer your question, "hamm" is a project name for the _next_ stable
release of Debian. The current stable release is "bo". Debian provides
Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 hat gesagt: // Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry to ask this but what is hamm,
>
> I guess i should know, but I am new to this list, and Debain(after just moving
> from RedHat), so if someone could please let me know, I would be grateful,
> > Between that and it auto-loading lynx on a an HTML attachment it's getting
> > to be a pretty fancy reader! :-)
> ^^^
> How did you get it to load lynx? ...
To be honest I have no idea. I just notice that pine was doing it a few
months back..
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Adam Shand wrote:
> Between that and it auto-loading lynx on a an HTML attachment it's getting
> to be a pretty fancy reader! :-)
^^^
How did you get it to load lynx? ...
-K
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail
> Actually, you ran into pine displaying the HTML version but including the
> text version that was also included when you replied. Many HTMLizing
> mailers seem to send out a plain-text version as well.
Ya... I realise this... but there are many tags that pine can't display
(like and tags) so
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Adam Shand wrote:
> Speaking of which has anyone else noticed that pine hides some HTML tags
> automatically?
>
> I was most surprised the other day when I replied to s two line message
> only to discover (as soon as the reply screen came up) that there had
> actually been ab
> I hope this is normal text... :-/)
Speaking of which has anyone else noticed that pine hides some HTML tags
automatically?
I was most surprised the other day when I replied to s two line message
only to discover (as soon as the reply screen came up) that there had
actually been about 6 more l
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Much better!
>
> thanks,
>
> Hamish
I want to say sorry to everybody- won't happen again (grin)...
Mac
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
I got mine from ftp://portal.stwing.upenn.edu/pub/rc5
If only I had masquerade for the other 4 computers, damn.. Now,
only one computer eats on the tacos.
Ioannis Tambouras
[EMAIL PROTECTED], West Palm Beach, Florida
Signed pgp-key on key server.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:
>The ftp site I gave doesn't seem to be carrying the Linux
>clients. You can get the Linux clients from
>ftp://portal.stwing.upenn.edu:/pub/rc5
> -or-
>http://www.i-connec.net/
Where exactly is the software on the i-Connect site? I don't see any sign
of it.
-Randy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THI
>The ftp site I gave doesn't seem to be carrying the Linux
>clients. You can get the Linux clients from
>ftp://portal.stwing.upenn.edu:/pub/rc5
> -or-
>http://www.i-connec.net/
>
>Sorry about the misinformation there..
I'd suggest you slow down a bit and *check* those URLs before sending your
mes
64 matches
Mail list logo
