Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-26 Thread Byunghee HWANG
"Russell S." writes: > Chris Green writes: > >> Jeffrey Walton wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote: >>> > >>> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >>> > >>> > [...] >>> > >>> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than >>>

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-07 Thread Russell S.
Chris Green writes: > Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than >> > > mailing lists and various email

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-07 Thread songbird
to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:44:56AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-07 Thread Chris Green
Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than > > > mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-07 Thread tomas
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:44:56AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than > > > mailing lists and vari

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-07 Thread Anssi Saari
Jeffrey Walton writes: > I've never seen the Usenet equivalents documented anywhere. Do you > know what they are? Maybe something like comp.debian or > comp.linux.debian? As an example, on news.gmane.io this debian-user list is gmane.linux.debian.user. If there's mirroring to general Usenet, I d

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-06 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > [...] > > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than > > mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect > > protocols to cross pollinate? > >

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-06 Thread tomas
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: [...] > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than > mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect > protocols to cross pollinate? Gateways. They live between protocols. In the concrete c

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-06 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 9:27 PM Russell S. wrote: > > David Wright writes: > > > On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote: > >> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they > >> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail > >> un

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-06 Thread Russell S.
David Wright writes: > On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote: >> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they >> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail >> until one finally went through and that would be it. >> >> So, a

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-06 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 04:45:26PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote: > > I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they > > were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail > > until one finally went

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-06 Thread Bret Busby
On 7/2/25 05:20, Russell Stinnett wrote: So, again, I apologize for the spam. I don't know of another way to test it. Stop it, or you will go blind... .. Bret Busby Armadale West Australia (UTC+0800) ..

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-06 Thread David Wright
On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote: > I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they > were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail > until one finally went through and that would be it. > > So, again, I apologize for the spam

Re: Sorry for spamming the list

2025-02-06 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 09:20:18PM +, Russell Stinnett wrote: > I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they > were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail > until one finally went through and that would be it. > Hi Russell, Maybe that's lesson #

Re: Sorry

2024-04-18 Thread The Wanderer
On 2024-04-18 at 11:15, Hans wrote: > Sorry, the spam tag appears because of DCIM in the header. > > Not my fault. But it did not appear on *this* message from you to the list. Is there a reason you couldn't edit the Subject: lines of the replies you're sending, before you send them, to remove

Re: Sorry for the misattribution [was: ZFS performance (was: Re: deduplicating file systems: VDO] withDebian?)

2022-11-14 Thread hw
On Sat, 2022-11-12 at 07:27 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 07:22:19PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [...] > > > I think what hede was hinting at was that early SSDs had a (pretty) > > limited number of write cycles [...] > > As was pointed out to me, the OP wasn't

Re: sorry for off-topic, i really curious some picture that have [Brian May] <- Queen?!

2019-03-11 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 7:54 AM 황병희 wrote: > Dear Brad, > > On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote: > > [...snip...] > >>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?! > > > > Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's > > guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial.

Re: sorry for off-topic, i really curious some picture that have [Brian May] <- Queen?!

2019-03-10 Thread 황병희
Dear Brad, On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote: > [...snip...] >>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?! > > Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's > guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial. Thus making it > unlikely they're the same person. Ah ye

Re: sorry for off-topic, i really curious some picture that have [Brian May] <- Queen?!

2019-03-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:58:07 +0900 황병희 wrote: Hello 황병희, >Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?! Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial. Thus making it unlikely they're the same person. -- Regards _

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Brian
On Mon 02 May 2016 at 08:44:53 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > > [...] > > > That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into > > the bit bucket [...] > > I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejec

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Gary Roach
On 05/01/2016 11:44 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: [...] That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into the bit bucket [...] I doubt that part. Especially having already

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: [...] > That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into > the bit bucket [...] I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejects from some Debian list due to

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Gary Roach
On 05/01/2016 10:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote: Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit on the site restrictions. Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are asked, you would get more help

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 09:59 -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > I need to re-read Gene Haskett's suggestion again and try to > impliment  > it. Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a > bit  > on the site restrictions. You could probably file a bug about reject notices. As for the

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote: > Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit > on the site restrictions. Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are asked, you would get more help faster. Lisi

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Gary Roach
On 05/01/2016 04:46 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send anything other than plain text files. I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and

Re: Sorry another OT, but it's important not only for FLOSS

2011-10-06 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 02:07:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Wow, this one didn't came through the list, while tons of HTML spam > does. Ralf, the above comment was not very clever :-/ > I hope it's regarding to just a link in the message's body and not > to the content of the link. And suggestin

Re: Sorry

2008-04-18 Thread Brad Rogers
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:59:59 -0400 "Thomas H. George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Thomas, > Sorry, I thought if I changed the subject it would start a new thread. In mailers that ignore Reference or In-Reply-To headers, it will appear as a new thread. Most email packages don't ignore those

Re: Sorry for duplicate post

2004-04-21 Thread Brad Stockdale
Everyone, I apologize for the duplicate post. The first time when I clicked send, I noticed it had the wrong From: address, so I resent it with the proper one thinking that the first one would get rejected since the other email isn't subscribed to the list. Sorry!! Brad -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: sorry this is a test

2004-03-05 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:54:50PM +0100, ray wrote: > sorry this is a test as my messages don't show up Email and usenet isn't instant. Give it four days before claiming it didn't get there. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :

Re: Sorry, slightly OT: WLAN

2003-06-19 Thread Dave Thayer
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:12:39PM +0100, Benjamin Swatek wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:02, Dave Thayer wrote: [...] > > While I agree with the above, it should be pointed out that it's a > > *lot* easier to relocate a hardware AP for better coverage than a > > desktop machine, so if your route

Re: Sorry, slightly OT: WLAN

2003-06-18 Thread Benjamin Swatek
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 16:42, Bret Comstock Waldow wrote: > On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:03, Benjamin Swatek wrote: > > > I mean one of these nice little boxes which aren't more than this or can > > I use some linux-box set up as a router which I connect to the internet > > as an accesspoint via a wlan

Re: Sorry, slightly OT: WLAN

2003-06-18 Thread Benjamin Swatek
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:02, Dave Thayer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:27:34AM -0500, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: > > Quoting Benjamin Swatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Sorry, but nether googeling nor the wlan-howto enlighted me completely > > > and I know that this is not so debian specific, bu

Re: Sorry, slightly OT: WLAN

2003-06-16 Thread Dave Thayer
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:27:34AM -0500, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: > Quoting Benjamin Swatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Sorry, but nether googeling nor the wlan-howto enlighted me completely > > and I know that this is not so debian specific, but: > > For a home-wlan, do I realy need an accesspoint?

Re: Sorry, slightly OT: WLAN

2003-06-16 Thread Bret Comstock Waldow
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:03, Benjamin Swatek wrote: > I mean one of these nice little boxes which aren't more than this or can > I use some linux-box set up as a router which I connect to the internet > as an accesspoint via a wlan-pci-card? Does it need to be a special > wlan-card? This language

Re: Sorry, slightly OT: WLAN

2003-06-16 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Benjamin Swatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry, but nether googeling nor the wlan-howto enlighted me completely > and I know that this is not so debian specific, but: > For a home-wlan, do I realy need an accesspoint? > I mean one of these nice little boxes which aren't more than this or can

Re: Sorry

2002-11-18 Thread Tom Cook
On 0, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > I tried removing some packages of kde that I don't want on my > system. like kab and karm. However dpkg --purge tells me that there is daa > dependency problem. apt-get remove kab shows that it is removing kde > too.daapt-cache kde shows that it is a meta pa

Re: Sorry for problems

2002-06-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 08:32:26PM +0200, prover wrote: > Everybody, please, excuse me for problems > > I was trying unsubscribe form your mailing lists, but your listmaster told > me, that i'm not in your mailing list. > What can I do now? > Members from debian mailing lists are sendin to me 200

Re: Sorry for problems

2002-06-04 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 08:32 PM +0200, prover ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Everybody, please, excuse me for problems > > I was trying unsubscribe form your mailing lists, but your listmaster told > me, that i'm not in your mailing list. > What can I do now? > Members from debian mailing lists are

RE: Sorry, off topic, but HOWTO get to bios with IBM Thinkpad 75

2001-01-22 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 21-Jan-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've wasted another hour or so trying to answer this simple > question, starting at IBM's Laptop support homepage. > > To paraphrase somebody else, if I knew who I would give > credit, but... I have seen a lot of progress in my lifetime of > computing e

Re: Sorry, off topic, but HOWTO get to bios with IBM Thinkpad 755...

2001-01-21 Thread Frank Copeland
On 21 Jan 01 02:37:20 GMT, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >IIRC, you hit F1 during the bootstrap. The manual I read (ThinkPad 560X) said to hold the F1 key down, power on, and continue holding down F1 until the BIOS setup came up. Frank

Re: Sorry, off topic, but HOWTO get to bios with IBM Thinkpad 755...

2001-01-20 Thread Mircea Luca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've wasted another hour or so trying to answer this simple > question, starting at IBM's Laptop support homepage. > > To paraphrase somebody else, if I knew who I would give > credit, but... I have seen a lot of progress in my lifetime of > computing experience, and

Re: Sorry, off topic, but HOWTO get to bios with IBM Thinkpad 755...

2001-01-20 Thread Carl Fink
IIRC, you hit F1 during the bootstrap. -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sorry

2000-12-11 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Mon 11 Dec 00, 11:36 AM, Dale Kosan said... > Pete, > > > Thanks for your help, sorry I did not know I had to watch my format of > sentences and paragraphs.I will be more careful in the future. : ) well, you don't really have to do anything you don't want to. right now, you're using W

Re: Sorry..

2000-09-24 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Idimmu Xul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ix> Also would i be correct in saying that I shouldn't have gnome ix> running while I download and install? I've never known it to be a problem if you're using an app you upgrade with apt-get. It Just Works. ix> I dunno.. I just don't want to kill

Re: Sorry wrong list Was: TDSL on demand: PPPD mit demand-Option oder diald?

2000-03-11 Thread Ramin Motakef
Sorry, was intendet for debian-user-de

Re: Sorry, it's sound again, pls. help

1999-03-27 Thread O. Niepolt
Roy-Anders Larsen wrote: > I have an SB16PnP and I recently posted the instructions on how I did the > sound on my system to this debian-user list, see: > http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-user-9903/msg03187.html > I think http://netgod.net/ has the latest kernel debs, but I don't know i

Re: Sorry, it's sound again, pls. help

1999-03-27 Thread Roy-Anders Larsen
On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, O. Niepolt wrote: > which _is_ the standard kernel for slink? Would it make sense to use 2.2 > or to use ALSA? Where could I find 2.2 kernel debs? I'm asking this I have an SB16PnP and I recently posted the instructions on how I did the sound on my system to this debian-user

Re: Sorry, but I STILL can't sort out my MBR

1998-05-12 Thread C.J.LAWSON
Please check to see that lilo has the right parameters for your harddisk Particularly the bits about Large, LBA ... --Jonathan > "Lil-" comes up on the screen and the system hangs > > (Just glad I have a recent kernel boot disk =) ) > > /boot/boot.hda doesn't exist. > > I have no WinNT instal

Re: Sorry, but I STILL can't sort out my MBR

1998-05-11 Thread Bill Mitchell
On Sun, 10 May 1998, Tristan Day wrote: > Thanks to all for all the help and ideas, but it still won't work: here's > what has gone wrong: > 'lilo -u /dev/hda' says "boot sector of /dev/hda does not have a lilo > signature" > > 'lilo -u' runs fine and says that it has restored the original MBR

Re: Sorry, but I STILL can't sort out my MBR

1998-05-10 Thread Ossama Othman
Sorry, that should have been: dd if=/boot/boot.0301 of=/dev/hda bs=446 count=1 -Ossama -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sorry, but I STILL can't sort out my MBR

1998-05-10 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi, > Here's a list of the files in /boot/ [snip] > boot.0301 [snip] Here is what the lilo manual says: --- LILO automatically makes backup copies when it overwrites boot sectors. They are named /boot/boot., with corresponding to the device number, e.g. 0300 is /dev/hda, 08

Re: Sorry, but I STILL can't sort out my MBR

1998-05-10 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, May 10, 1998 at 01:23:48PM +0100, Tristan Day wrote: > Thanks to all for all the help and ideas, but it still won't work: here's > what has gone wrong: Can you state the problem again? I missed your earlier posts. > The DOS 'fdisk /MBR' ran with no errors, but made no difference to bootup

Re: Sorry This is probably a stupid question.

1998-02-24 Thread tko
Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 writes: > > Hi all, > > Sorry to ask this but what is hamm, No stupid questions, just information requests 8-) Anyhow, to answer your question, "hamm" is a project name for the _next_ stable release of Debian. The current stable release is "bo". Debian provides

Re: Sorry This is probably a stupid question.

1998-02-24 Thread Frank Barknecht
Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 hat gesagt: // Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry to ask this but what is hamm, > > I guess i should know, but I am new to this list, and Debain(after just moving > from RedHat), so if someone could please let me know, I would be grateful,

Re: Sorry for the html-mails

1998-01-27 Thread Adam Shand
> > Between that and it auto-loading lynx on a an HTML attachment it's getting > > to be a pretty fancy reader! :-) > ^^^ > How did you get it to load lynx? ... To be honest I have no idea. I just notice that pine was doing it a few months back..

Re: Sorry for the html-mails

1998-01-27 Thread Ender Wigin
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Adam Shand wrote: > Between that and it auto-loading lynx on a an HTML attachment it's getting > to be a pretty fancy reader! :-) ^^^ How did you get it to load lynx? ... -K -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail

Re: Sorry for the html-mails

1998-01-26 Thread Adam Shand
> Actually, you ran into pine displaying the HTML version but including the > text version that was also included when you replied. Many HTMLizing > mailers seem to send out a plain-text version as well. Ya... I realise this... but there are many tags that pine can't display (like and tags) so

Re: Sorry for the html-mails

1998-01-26 Thread Scott Ellis
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Adam Shand wrote: > Speaking of which has anyone else noticed that pine hides some HTML tags > automatically? > > I was most surprised the other day when I replied to s two line message > only to discover (as soon as the reply screen came up) that there had > actually been ab

Re: Sorry for the html-mails

1998-01-26 Thread Adam Shand
> I hope this is normal text... :-/) Speaking of which has anyone else noticed that pine hides some HTML tags automatically? I was most surprised the other day when I replied to s two line message only to discover (as soon as the reply screen came up) that there had actually been about 6 more l

Re: Sorry for the html-mails

1998-01-26 Thread Markus Lechner
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Much better! > > thanks, > > Hamish I want to say sorry to everybody- won't happen again (grin)... Mac -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: Sorry, again... for the RC5 stuff

1997-02-23 Thread Ioannis Tambouras
I got mine from ftp://portal.stwing.upenn.edu/pub/rc5 If only I had masquerade for the other 4 computers, damn.. Now, only one computer eats on the tacos. Ioannis Tambouras [EMAIL PROTECTED], West Palm Beach, Florida Signed pgp-key on key server. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:

Re: Sorry, again... for the RC5 stuff

1997-02-23 Thread Randy Gobbel
>The ftp site I gave doesn't seem to be carrying the Linux >clients. You can get the Linux clients from >ftp://portal.stwing.upenn.edu:/pub/rc5 > -or- >http://www.i-connec.net/ Where exactly is the software on the i-Connect site? I don't see any sign of it. -Randy -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THI

Re: Sorry, again... for the RC5 stuff

1997-02-23 Thread Randy Gobbel
>The ftp site I gave doesn't seem to be carrying the Linux >clients. You can get the Linux clients from >ftp://portal.stwing.upenn.edu:/pub/rc5 > -or- >http://www.i-connec.net/ > >Sorry about the misinformation there.. I'd suggest you slow down a bit and *check* those URLs before sending your mes