>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy J. Miller) writes:
>>
>> >So I swapped the sticks. The memory test *still* failed at
>> > 11Mb. Reenabled the cache and it still fails at 11Mb.
>>
>> *sigh* Failed at *17Mb*. Succeeded at *16Mb*. I *will* remember
>> to calculate in HEX, I *will* remembe
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I understand it, Pentium-class systems need 64-bit wide RAM;
> if you're using SIMMs, the 72-pin ones are only 32-bits wide, which is
> why you need them in pairs. Hence, you would not expect it to be an error
> at a certain address, because both SIM
On Tue, Mar 24, 1998 at 02:38:51PM -0600, Timothy J. Miller wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy J. Miller) writes:
> > So I swapped the sticks. The memory test *still* failed at
> > 11Mb. Reenabled the cache and it still fails at 11Mb.
>
> *sigh* Failed at *17Mb*. Succeeded at *16Mb*.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy J. Miller) writes:
> So I swapped the sticks. The memory test *still* failed at
> 11Mb. Reenabled the cache and it still fails at 11Mb.
*sigh* Failed at *17Mb*. Succeeded at *16Mb*. I *will* remember
to calculate in HEX, I *will* remember to calculate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy J. Miller) writes:
> What am I missing? Or should I return *both* set of sticks and
> give up?
Okay-- here's an update:
I hit the sig11 page I was pointed to and read it. I tried
disabling the cache to no effect. I *did* discover when I went to
On 24 Mar 1998, Timothy J. Miller wrote:
> The system is a home-built; PCI IDE motherboard housing a Cyrix
> 6x86-233, 32Mb EDO RAM, Acer 24x CDROM and a modem.
You name the brand of the cdrom, but the motherboard goes unnamed. I'd
rather buy a quality motherboard than a cdrom. Remember, th
On Tue, Mar 24, 1998 at 07:54:49AM -0600, Timothy J. Miller wrote:
[sig 11 problem]
> On the initial compile I started having problems with GCC dumping
> out on unexpected signals (11). From what I've read in the past, this is
> indicative of memory problems, particularly with non-parity SI
7 matches
Mail list logo
