Re: Slow response of X

2005-10-20 Thread Basajaun
Joseph H. Fry wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 09:12 -0700, Basajaun wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a weird problem with the response time inside X. I am running > > Debian Etch, kernel 2.6.12-1-686-smp on a P4 3.4GHz HT with a SATA > > drive and 1GB RAM. Whenever I start X (XFCE 4.2.2), I experie

Re: Slow response of X

2005-10-20 Thread Joseph H. Fry
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 09:12 -0700, Basajaun wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a weird problem with the response time inside X. I am running > Debian Etch, kernel 2.6.12-1-686-smp on a P4 3.4GHz HT with a SATA > drive and 1GB RAM. Whenever I start X (XFCE 4.2.2), I experience the > following problems: >

Re: Slow response of X

2005-10-20 Thread mikepolniak
On 09:12 Wed 19 Oct , Basajaun wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a weird problem with the response time inside X. I am running > Debian Etch, kernel 2.6.12-1-686-smp on a P4 3.4GHz HT with a SATA > drive and 1GB RAM. Whenever I start X (XFCE 4.2.2), I experience the > following problems: > > a) Whe

Re: Slow response of X

2005-10-19 Thread Basajaun
Olle Eriksson wrote: > On Wednesday 19 October 2005 18.12, Basajaun wrote: > > Somewhere else a guy with similar problems got a response asking if DMA > > was enabled, but my "dmesg | grep -i dma" shows: > > > > DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1 > > ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bm

Re: Slow response of X

2005-10-19 Thread Olle Eriksson
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 18.12, Basajaun wrote: > Somewhere else a guy with similar problems got a response asking if DMA > was enabled, but my "dmesg | grep -i dma" shows: > > DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1 > ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0xFFA0 irq 14 > ata1: dev 0 A