Re: Slow NFS

Andrew Reid wrote: > There is a performance-tuning section in the NFS Howto, > with several tips, including simple tests for measuring performance. > Thanks for the reminder. Somehow I'd missed that section of the Howto. > My own experience w

Re: Slow NFS

On Saturday 02 January 2010 10:55:18 Chris Davies wrote: > I'm curious whether anyone has good a decent read/write speed using NFS > (v3 or 4) between a number of Debian "testing" based systems. > > I've got one box exporting a number of filesystems using NFS v3, and > three others mounting various

Re: Slow NFS

Post your /etc/exports from some machine that has slow traffic. Is this only for nfs? Try copy some file with scp and compare the speed (it should be slower than nfs). Because this may not be nfs problem. I use nfs in a lot of machines, also for sharing users home folders. And doesn't have any

Re: Slow nfs mounts after sarge2etch upgrade

oops. The new problem was self-made. While debugging, I've added "noauto" to the fstab options. Everything is fine now. And a few things in etch are rather cool, namely a working hibernate-disk and a much better support for my wireless lan card. Have fun! Christoph Hello, thanks for respon

Re: Slow nfs mounts after sarge2etch upgrade

Hello, thanks for response. The firewall was the problem, but i still don't know why this happened. I'm using guarddog and the NFS protocol was set up correctly (it worked for sarge). I had to add the TCP port 684 manually and now it works. Now i have a new problem: The nfs shares are not mo

Re: slow nfs server

* Christopher S. Swingley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > Hi! > > I have a couple raid arrays (software raid, 2.4 kernel) that I've > been exporting to a variety of other boxen where I work. Now that > more than a few machines have these mounted (> 10, < 25), NFS has > become incredibly slugg

Re: Slow NFS or slow NIC?

On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 08:56:27PM +0100, Konrad Mierendorff wrote: > Carel Fellinger wrote: > > Okee, so there is more overhead. So more bytes have to be transfered. > > But almost doubling it seems a bit overdone, doesn't it. So I'm still > > Check the CPU-usage to get this answered. Thought I

Re: Slow NFS or slow NIC?

On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 12:35:25PM -0800, aphro wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote: > > look at a network monitor like iptraf when transferring files and look at > how many bytes are transferred during file copy with NFS, are you using was looking for such a beast, but didn't kno

Re: Slow NFS or slow NIC?

Carel Fellinger wrote: > Okee, so there is more overhead. So more bytes have to be transfered. > But almost doubling it seems a bit overdone, doesn't it. So I'm still > wondering... Is the overhead mainly in the extra bytes to be sent, > then a 100Mbs Ethernet card would improve things. Or is the o

Re: Slow NFS or slow NIC?

On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote: cfelli >Okee, so there is more overhead. So more bytes have to be transfered. cfelli >But almost doubling it seems a bit overdone, doesn't it. So I'm still cfelli >wondering... Is the overhead mainly in the extra bytes to be sent, cfelli >then a 100Mbs E

Re: Slow NFS or slow NIC?

On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 11:26:05AM +1030, John Pearson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote > > using ncftp I get the expected 1.0+MBs transfer copying a large file into > > /dev/null. Quite reasonable on a 10Mbs ethernet considering ftp and tcp each > > adding

Re: Slow NFS or slow NIC?

On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 12:17:58AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote: > Try adding rsize=8192,wsize=8192 to the mount options in fstab. that's what I used, much better than the default 1024, but still horrible;( -- groetjes, carel

Re: Slow NFS or slow NIC?

On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote: > Ethernet? or has nfs so much overhead (but ftp does okee)? or is the 486 > the culprit? Try adding rsize=8192,wsize=8192 to the mount options in fstab. That should do the trick. Wouter -- Linux duckman 2.2.14 #1 Wed Jan 5 14:45:

Re: Slow NFS or slow NIC?

the culprit is the lack of support for NFS on linux still, last i heard it was still very pooly maintained(amazing that SAMBA gets 1000x more attention then NFS!) there are some tweaks out there but don't expect a miracle, until the NFS code is cleaned up..its gonna be slow and buggy. its not as bu

Re: Slow NFS or slow NIC?

On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote > Now that I've two machines I'm finally able to experience the full benefits > of Debian GNU/Linux. Reading all I could find on the subject on the HAMM-cd's > I managed to get nfs and nis working, exported /home and did some tests. >