Re: Signed Email PAM authentication

2021-05-14 Thread Marek Mosiewicz
W dniu pią, 14.05.2021 o godzinie 16∶05 +0100, użytkownik Darac Marjal napisał: > > On 14/05/2021 15:29, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I think of idea of having additional PAM module which passes login > > after receiving and validating signed email (for some scenarios it > > could ev

Re: Signed Email PAM authentication

2021-05-14 Thread Marek Mosiewicz
W dniu pią, 14.05.2021 o godzinie 10∶52 -0500, użytkownik David Wright napisał: > On Fri 14 May 2021 at 16:29:32 (+0200), Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > > > > I think of idea of having additional PAM module which passes login > > after receiving and validating signed email (for some scenarios it > > cou

Re: Signed Email PAM authentication

2021-05-14 Thread David Wright
On Fri 14 May 2021 at 16:29:32 (+0200), Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > > I think of idea of having additional PAM module which passes login > after receiving and validating signed email (for some scenarios it > could even requires emails from many persons). That's all very vague. You need to specify a

Re: Signed Email PAM authentication

2021-05-14 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 14 May 2021 16:29:32 +0200 Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > Hello, > > I think of idea of having additional PAM module which passes login > after receiving and validating signed email (for some scenarios it > could even requires emails from many persons). Signing emails can be > done easliy in s

Re: Signed Email PAM authentication

2021-05-14 Thread Darac Marjal
On 14/05/2021 15:29, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > Hello, > > I think of idea of having additional PAM module which passes login > after receiving and validating signed email (for some scenarios it > could even requires emails from many persons). Signing emails can be > done easliy in secure way and it