iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -i eth1 -j DNAT --to
192.168.69.2:25
you mean --dport 25 don't you?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:04:56AM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> This is really getting frustrating - mainly because I don't really
> understand what I'm doing. Using a port scanner from an external
> webserver, it shows that ports 25, 80, and 10025 are all closed.
>
> What am I missing?
>
>
> > This is really getting frustrating - mainly because I don't really
> > understand what I'm doing. Using a port scanner from an external
> > webserver, it shows that ports 25, 80, and 10025 are all closed.
> >
> > What am I missing?
> >
> > Here's the iptables dump from both my firewall and
This is really getting frustrating - mainly because I don't really
understand what I'm doing. Using a port scanner from an external
webserver, it shows that ports 25, 80, and 10025 are all closed.
What am I missing?
Here's the iptables dump from both my firewall and my internal server.
*** FIRE
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 05:50:09AM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Adam Majer wrote:
>
> > Of course they are going to not allow other e-mail addresses to be
> > used! Otherwise their smarthost becomes a spamhost.
>
> Though they can probably use tricks to prevent multip
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:44:02 -0500
Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply about setting up smarthost. I reconfigured exim
> for that and It works.But now All mail sent out from the machine
> gets bounced, saying:
>
>
> Remote host said: 550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROT
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Adam Majer wrote:
> Of course they are going to not allow other e-mail addresses to be
> used! Otherwise their smarthost becomes a spamhost.
Though they can probably use tricks to prevent multiple sendings of the
same message or using spamfilters outbound to silently reject t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 January 2002 4:11 am, Adam Majer wrote:
>
> Of course they are going to not allow other e-mail addresses to be used!
> Otherwise their smarthost becomes a spamhost.
That doesn't necessarily follow. Provided they know that the connecti
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:12:16PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> > > Thanks for the reply about setting up smarthost. I reconfigured exim
> > > for that and It works.But now All mail sent out from the machine
> > > gets bounced, saying:
> > >
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply about setting up smarthost. I reconfigured exim
> > for that and It works.But now All mail sent out from the machine
> > gets bounced, saying:
> >
> >
> > Remote host said: 550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by
> > ad
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:44:02PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> Thanks for the reply about setting up smarthost. I reconfigured exim
> for that and It works.But now All mail sent out from the machine
> gets bounced, saying:
>
>
> Remote host said: 550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohib
Ken Weingold([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Thanks for the reply about setting up smarthost. I reconfigured exim
> for that and It works.But now All mail sent out from the machine
> gets bounced, saying:
>
>
> Remote host said: 550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited
Thanks for the reply about setting up smarthost. I reconfigured exim
for that and It works.But now All mail sent out from the machine
gets bounced, saying:
Remote host said: 550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by
administrator
Any ideas?
Sorry if this is out of the scope of
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 03:47:02AM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
| I am trying to be able to allow mutt to send and receive mail from my
| 2.2r2 system here with DSL. I decided to install exim since it seems to
| be easier to configure than sendmail. It seems to be working sending to
| yahoo.com
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> 550 Dialups/open relays blocked. Contact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Anyone know how I can make it work with all addresses?
Use your ISP's mail server as a smarthost.
--
Baloo
Try the following:
One other thing you need to do: add a blank line, followed by the
following lines to /etc/smail/directors. THIS SHOULD BE THE LAST LINES
OF THE FILE. Otherwise, mail loss is a definite possibility.
smartuser:
driver=smartuser;
new_user=$user@, well_formed_onl
Hi Alan,
I may have the answer. I have my "visible name " set to that of my ISP
which is cleo.murdoch.edu.au. This means that all replies get sent to the
right place. It took me a while to get the right combination in the
config and I made a note of how I did it for future reference.
elm $> ca
On Wed, 25 Sep 1996, alan davis wrote:
> I am able to send mail to distant sites fine, but mail to
> addresses at the domain of my ISP usually fails, from within Emacs
> (but seems to work from within Pine, at least some of the time).
> Actually, mail sometimes gets out from emacs
Alan Eugene Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I am able to send mail to distant sites fine, but mail to
>addresses at the domain of my ISP usually fails, from within Emacs
>(but seems to work from within Pine, at least some of the time).
>Actually, mail sometimes gets out from ema
19 matches
Mail list logo
