Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-12 Thread Alexis
Chris Bannister writes: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 02:27:06PM +1000, Alexis wrote: Christian Seiler writes: >Ok, since there appears to be some kind of confusion, I'll >explain. [snip comprehensive explanatory/summary of what the various official Debian repos are used for] Thank you ver

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-12 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 02:27:06PM +1000, Alexis wrote: > > Christian Seiler writes: > > >Ok, since there appears to be some kind of confusion, I'll explain. > > [snip comprehensive explanatory/summary of what the various official Debian > repos are used for] > > Thank you very much for all th

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-05 Thread Alexis
Christian Seiler writes: Ok, since there appears to be some kind of confusion, I'll explain. [snip comprehensive explanatory/summary of what the various official Debian repos are used for] Thank you very much for all this - it's greatly appreciated! i'd like to suggest that this summary

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Monday 04 May 2015 12:31:27 Alexis wrote: > Christian Seiler writes: > > I linked a wiki page in my previous email describing precisely > > what wheezy-updates is (and it is NOT the regular security > > update repository): https://wiki.debian.org/StableUpdates > > Yes, i read that: > > * Since

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 2015-05-04 13:31, schrieb Alexis: * Since it mentions things like updates to virus scanners, it seemed plausible to me that it was indeed the same repo. If, as you assert, it's not, then i think it's concerning that there are /two/ distinct repos one needs to enable in order to get all rel

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Alexis
Lisi Reisz writes: One is security, as it says. The other is what used to be called volatile and is needed if you have e.g. a virus scanner of any kind. Sorry, but as i alluded to in my last email to Christian, this doesn't make sense to me. Shouldn't people reasonably expect virus-scann

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Alexis
Christian Seiler writes: I linked a wiki page in my previous email describing precisely what wheezy-updates is (and it is NOT the regular security update repository): https://wiki.debian.org/StableUpdates Yes, i read that: * Since it mentions things like updates to virus scanners, it see

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Mathias Friman
2015-05-04 13:03 GMT+02:00 Christian Seiler : > Am 2015-05-04 12:30, schrieb Alexis: > >> Further, afaik, the wheezy-updates line should refer to the same set >> of packages as the wheezy/updates line from security.debian.org. If >> that's so, then having two different lines refer to the same pack

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 2015-05-04 12:30, schrieb Alexis: Further, afaik, the wheezy-updates line should refer to the same set of packages as the wheezy/updates line from security.debian.org. If that's so, then having two different lines refer to the same package set is merely confusing the config further. If not, th

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Monday 04 May 2015 11:30:06 Alexis wrote: > Further, afaik, the wheezy-updates line should refer to the same > set of packages as the wheezy/updates line from > security.debian.org. If that's so, then having two different lines > refer to the same package set is merely confusing the config > fur

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Alexis
Christian Seiler writes: Am 2015-05-04 12:11, schrieb Alexis: And my guess is that you should also remove the line: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy-updates main Why that? wheezy-updates still exists and if it was in there before, it was probably wanted explicitly. Not necessar

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 2015-05-04 12:11, schrieb Alexis: And my guess is that you should also remove the line: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy-updates main Why that? wheezy-updates still exists and if it was in there before, it was probably wanted explicitly. See: https://wiki.debian.org/StableUpdates

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Alexis
Mathias Friman writes: My sources.list: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy main deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy-updates main ## Backports repository: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy-backports main # fusiondi

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 2015-05-04 09:48, schrieb Mathias Friman: recently Ive encountered this problem when doing a server-installation with FAI from CD. There seems to be some security updates that break the dependencies I rely on. As of now Ive disabled the security repository on the install-CD and enable it whe