On 3/1/19 4:20 PM, Fabiano Ferronato wrote:
> I'm installing Debian in my Asus ROG GL552VW laptop (Intel and
> Nvidia video cards) and the resolution (probably 3840x2160)is
> set in a way that the font size is so small that I have to
> almost put my face on the monitor so I can read. And the
> wi
Le 01/03/2019 à 18:30, Felix Miata a écrit :
Including either nomodeset or nouveau.modeset=0 for installation
is pointless, since the installer does not use KMS.
Another key is the i7-6700HQ provides HD 530 Intel video. Intel + NVidia
usually equates to
"Optimus"
which makes nouveau.modes
Fabiano Ferronato composed on 2019-03-01 16:20 (UTC+0100):
> I don't know if this is the wright place to ask, but I'm searching a lot
> trying to find a way to this problem.
> I'm installing Debian in my Asus ROG GL552VW laptop (Intel and Nvidia video
> cards) and the resolution (probably 3840x216
On 2019-03-01, Fabiano Ferronato wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I don't know if this is the wright place to ask, but I'm searching a lot
> trying to find a way to this problem.
> I'm installing Debian in my Asus ROG GL552VW laptop (Intel and Nvidia video
> cards) and the resolution (probably 3840x2160)is
On 04/30/2015 05:47 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:22:43PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
On 04/29/2015 09:47 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 29.04.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Gary Roach:
I just upgraded to Jessie with no problems. I use a 24" 16x9 monitor.
With wheezy, there was a 1920 x 10
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:22:43PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 09:47 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >Am 29.04.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Gary Roach:
> >>I just upgraded to Jessie with no problems. I use a 24" 16x9 monitor.
> >>With wheezy, there was a 1920 x 1080? mode that gave the correct asp
Am 29.04.2015 um 21:22 schrieb Gary Roach:
> [27.621] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable
> [27.638] (EE) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering
> [29.297] (II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized swrast
> [29.297] (II) GLX: Initialized DRISWRAST GL provider for screen 0
I don't see
On 04/29/2015 09:47 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 29.04.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Gary Roach:
I just upgraded to Jessie with no problems. I use a 24" 16x9 monitor.
With wheezy, there was a 1920 x 1080? mode that gave the correct aspect
ratio for the 16x9 screens. Jessie seems to only have the 4x3 1600
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:30:03 +0200, Gary Roach wrote:
> I just upgraded to Jessie with no problems. I use a 24" 16x9 monitor.
> With wheezy, there was a 1920 x 1080? mode that gave the correct aspect
> ratio for the 16x9 screens. Jessie seems to only have the 4x3 1600x1200
> mode. All of my cir
Am 29.04.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Gary Roach:
> I just upgraded to Jessie with no problems. I use a 24" 16x9 monitor.
> With wheezy, there was a 1920 x 1080? mode that gave the correct aspect
> ratio for the 16x9 screens. Jessie seems to only have the 4x3 1600x1200
> mode. All of my circles are now el
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 01:11:37 +
Brian wrote:
> On Sat 07 Jan 2012 at 11:49:08 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> > Did you try without the Modeline? As far as I know X should be able
> > to compute it based on HorizSync, VertRefresh and Modes.
>
> X may indeed do this but, after commenting out
On Sat 07 Jan 2012 at 11:49:08 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Did you try without the Modeline? As far as I know X should be able to
> compute it based on HorizSync, VertRefresh and Modes.
X may indeed do this but, after commenting out Modeline, the best it
could offer was 1024x768.
> Also, it
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:37:01 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
> On 06/01/12 18:21, Camaleón wrote:
>> Yup, you have to add the unexistant mode before you can use it :-)
>> Steps are detailed at "Adding undetected resolutions" section.
>> Greetings,
>
> OK, in an ideal world though shouldnt the board 'an
On Vi, 06 ian 12, 23:28:07, Brian wrote:
>
> I'll not bore you with why it happens but the EDID data are not passed to
> X on a couple of my machines, My xorg.conf is usually non-existent but
> in this case I have:
>
>Section "Monitor"
>Identifier "1905FP"
>Modeline "1280x1024"
On Fri 06 Jan 2012 at 18:37:01 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
> OK, in an ideal world though shouldnt the board 'announce' that it
> supports that mode when probed?
I think X can only work with what it is given. If the monitor fails for
some reason to impart information X's idea of what is possible
Andrew Wood:
> On 06/01/12 18:21, Camaleón wrote:
>> Yup, you have to add the unexistant mode before you can use it :-)
>> Steps are detailed at "Adding undetected resolutions" section.
>> Greetings,
>
> OK, in an ideal world though shouldnt the board 'announce' that it
> supports that mode when p
On 06/01/12 18:21, Camaleón wrote:
Yup, you have to add the unexistant mode before you can use it :-)
Steps are detailed at "Adding undetected resolutions" section. Greetings,
OK, in an ideal world though shouldnt the board 'announce' that it
supports that mode when probed?
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:42:37 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
> On 06/01/12 16:59, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:59:45 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
>>
>>> Ive got an LCD screen whose native resolution is 1440x900 yet i can
>>> only get Wheezy to display 1024x768. No higher resolution is listed i
Thanks guys, xrandr gives:
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096
VGA1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
0mm x 0mm
1024x768 60.0*
800x60060.3 56.2
848x48060.0
640x48059.9
DVI1 disconnected
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:59:45 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
> Ive got an LCD screen whose native resolution is 1440x900 yet i can only
> get Wheezy to display 1024x768. No higher resolution is listed in System
> Settings. How do I enable a higher resolution please?
What's the output of "xrandr"?
You
Andrew Wood wrote:
Hi Kevin
yes the xserver-xorg-video-intel package is installed. how do i check
which driver is actually being used? one strange thing is that the
kernel is printing out the following to the console, not sure what it
means, could it be a fault with the controller board in the
You can tell by looking in /var/log/Xorg.0.log. If after looking at
the log file, the problem isn't readily apparent, post the contents
here, and someone should be able to figure out what's wrong.
-- Kevin
The pertinent contents of the log seem to be as follows. Im not sure how
it works.
On Vi, 06 ian 12, 02:31:17, Andrew Wood wrote:
> Hi Kevin
>
>
> yes the xserver-xorg-video-intel package is installed. how do i
> check which driver is actually being used? one strange thing is that
> the kernel is printing out the following to the console, not sure
> what it means, could it be a
On 01/05/2012 06:31 PM, Andrew Wood wrote:
Hi Kevin
yes the xserver-xorg-video-intel package is installed. how do i check
which driver is actually being used? one strange thing is that the
kernel is printing out the following to the console, not sure what it
means, could it be a fault with t
Hi Kevin
yes the xserver-xorg-video-intel package is installed. how do i check
which driver is actually being used? one strange thing is that the
kernel is printing out the following to the console, not sure what it
means, could it be a fault with the controller board in the LCD?
353.94242
On 01/05/2012 04:30 PM, Andrew Wood wrote:
Hi Bob
lspci gives:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controll
Hi Bob
lspci gives:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
On 06/01/12 00:23, Bob Proul
Hi Bob
lspci gives:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
On 06/01/12 00:23, Bob Proul
Hi Bob
lspci gives:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
On 06/01/12 00:23, Bob Proul
Hi Bob
lspci gives:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
On 06/01/12 00:23, Bob Proul
Sorry. should also have added the graphics chipset is an intel gma 950
integrated onto an atom itx motherboard.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f063
Andrew Wood wrote:
> Ive got an LCD screen whose native resolution is 1440x900 yet i can
> only get Wheezy to display 1024x768. No higher resolution is listed
> in System Settings. How do I enable a higher resolution please?
This is probably an issue of your graphics card rather than the
display i
On Vi, 18 feb 11, 22:49:22, Jeffrin Jose wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:16:06PM +0100, Lars Nielsen wrote:
> > I have just installed squeeze and it seems to work fine. But my screen
> > resolution is to low! I have a 24" wide screen and I can "only" set the
> > resolution to 1280x1024. Where o
on 17:16 Fri 18 Feb, Lars Nielsen (l...@lfweb.dk) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just installed squeeze and it seems to work fine. But my screen
> resolution is to low! I have a 24" wide screen and I can "only" set the
> resolution to 1280x1024. Where or how do I get the right resolution on
> 1920x1080 ?
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:16:06 +0100, Lars Nielsen wrote:
> I have just installed squeeze and it seems to work fine. But my screen
> resolution is to low! I have a 24" wide screen and I can "only" set the
> resolution to 1280x1024. Where or how do I get the right resolution on
> 1920x1080 ?
First,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:16:06PM +0100, Lars Nielsen wrote:
> I have just installed squeeze and it seems to work fine. But my screen
> resolution is to low! I have a 24" wide screen and I can "only" set the
> resolution to 1280x1024. Where or how do I get the right resolution on
> 1920x1080 ?
Yo
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:18:27 +0100, Andreas wrote:
(...)
> How can I tell the X11 server that is connected to a monitor that
> supports up to 1620x1200?
Maybe your D-Sub 15 to BNC cable adapter is no capable of doing an auto-
detection for the available resolutions :-?
If you are sure that you
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Koh Choon Lin wrote:
>>> I am using ATI Mobility Radeon, normally I would be using the vesa
>>> driver at 1280x1024. Its now at 1024x768 and GNOME doesn't offer any
>>> higher while my xorg.conf has no info at all.
>>>
>>
>> So are you using the binary driver? I th
>> I am using ATI Mobility Radeon, normally I would be using the vesa
>> driver at 1280x1024. Its now at 1024x768 and GNOME doesn't offer any
>> higher while my xorg.conf has no info at all.
>>
>
> So are you using the binary driver? I think the Catalyst control centre has
> options for this. Faili
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Koh Choon Lin wrote:
>> Your desktop environment should have a preferences tool for this -
>> certainly KDE and Gnome do. Is the resolution you want not given as an
>> option?
>>
>> What graphics card/driver are you using? I've noticed (may be coincidence)
>> that
> Your desktop environment should have a preferences tool for this -
> certainly KDE and Gnome do. Is the resolution you want not given as an
> option?
>
> What graphics card/driver are you using? I've noticed (may be coincidence)
> that machines I've had with NVidia cards never get the full range
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Koh Choon Lin wrote:
>> In terminal run the following command from root user.
>> dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg
>>
>> Here you can change default screen resolution.
>
> I got this message:
>
> xserver-xorg postinst warning: overwriting possibly-customised co
> In terminal run the following command from root user.
> dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg
>
> Here you can change default screen resolution.
I got this message:
xserver-xorg postinst warning: overwriting possibly-customised configuration
file; backup in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.20090219031522
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:23:35PM -0400, Ed Sutter wrote:
> No matter what I do, I'm not able to get the screen resolution up. It
> appears that
> it is just defaulting to the bare minimum resolution for some reason, but as
> far as
> I can tell, the card and monitor are properly being detected
great to know that it worked
that's the spirit! =D
all the best!
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:24, Ed Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felipe,
> After reading your previous email (regarding the monitor settings),
> I re-ran "dpkg-reconfigure xorg.conf", but this time I told it not
> to auto-
Felipe,
After reading your previous email (regarding the monitor settings),
I re-ran "dpkg-reconfigure xorg.conf", but this time I told it not
to auto-configure the monitor. It asked me a few questions, and
as a result the two lines you mention below (HorizSync/Vertrefresh)
were generated. That
Felipe,
Thanks for responding...
It's using GLINT, which I believe is the one it
should be using. I even tried vesa, but that was
one of the cases where it wouldn't even come up.
Ed
Felipe Gallois wrote:
hello there,
what driver is your xorg using?
$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf | grep Driver
if it
hello there,
what driver is your xorg using?
$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf | grep Driver
if it is using vesa, then your card's driver is not being loaded...
i can't count how many times this was the main problem for me =)
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 15:23, Ed Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:03:46PM +0200, niclas wahlgren wrote:
> Can't get screen resolution up to 1600x1200.
>
> xrandr says:
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 768, maximum 1280 x 1280
> VGA1 disconnected
> DVI0 disconnected
> VGA2 connected 1280x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm
> 1280x800
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/08 01:08, niclas wahlgren wrote:
[snip]
>
> grep /drivers/ /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//nv_drv.so
>
> It seems to be nv driver.
If it doen't offend your FOSS sensibilities, try the nvidia driver.
(But s
niclas wahlgren wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 22:03:46 +0200, niclas wahlgren wrote:
Can't get screen resolution up to 1600x1200.
xrandr says:
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 768, maximum 1280 x 1280
VGA1 disconnected
DVI0 disconnected
VGA2 connected 1280x
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 22:03:46 +0200, niclas wahlgren wrote:
Can't get screen resolution up to 1600x1200.
xrandr says:
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 768, maximum 1280 x 1280
VGA1 disconnected
DVI0 disconnected
VGA2 connected 1280x768+0+0 0mm x
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 22:03:46 +0200, niclas wahlgren wrote:
> Can't get screen resolution up to 1600x1200.
>
> xrandr says:
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 768, maximum 1280 x 1280
> VGA1 disconnected
> DVI0 disconnected
> VGA2 connected 1280x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm
> 1280x800 60
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/08 15:03, niclas wahlgren wrote:
Can't get screen resolution up to 1600x1200.
xrandr says:
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 768, maximum 1280 x 1280
VGA1 disconnected
DVI0 disconnected
VGA2 conne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/08 15:03, niclas wahlgren wrote:
> Can't get screen resolution up to 1600x1200.
>
> xrandr says:
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 768, maximum 1280 x 1280
> VGA1 disconnected
> DVI0 disconnected
> VGA2 connected 1280x768+0+0 0mm
take the time to read that page, it should clear up the issue for you.
OK ... I got my xorg.conf fixed up to my liking. Now ...
... for me, the real issue here isn't the need to learn something new:
shoot, that's fun. The issue for me here was that, as far as I was aware,
it just changed an
This is from the post that Mirko Parthey posted:
http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12 a good read.
you can add an "Option" along these lines under Monitor:
Option "PreferredMode" "1024x768_60.00" (assuming 60hz refresh rate, if
it is something else, change _60.00 to something
Glenn Becker wrote:
I stupidly deleted a response to my question regarding my "skeletal"
xorg.conf file. IIRC, the question was whether my file did not in fact
have a "Screen" section. It does, but it is as empty as the other
sections.
Since it doesn't amount to much, the whole thing follow
Glenn Becker writes:
> I stupidly deleted a response to my question regarding my "skeletal"
> xorg.conf file. IIRC, the question was whether my file did not in fact
> have a "Screen" section. It does, but it is as empty as the other
> sections.
Just fill the section in with what you want there.
--
I stupidly deleted a response to my question regarding my "skeletal"
xorg.conf file. IIRC, the question was whether my file did not in fact
have a "Screen" section. It does, but it is as empty as the other
sections.
Since it doesn't amount to much, the whole thing follows.
# xorg.conf (X.O
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:45:44AM +, Glenn Becker wrote:
> I am running a testing box. Recently, it seems, my X settings
> changed (w/o my intentionally changing them, at least as far as I can
> recall) so that the screen resolution on Gnome, for example, it was
> defaulting to 1400x1050. I
Glenn Becker wrote:
Hi all -
I am running a testing box. Recently, it seems, my X settings changed
(w/o my intentionally changing them, at least as far as I can recall) so
that the screen resolution on Gnome, for example, it was defaulting to
1400x1050. It is nice to see that my older laptop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/08 20:45, Glenn Becker wrote:
>
> Hi all -
>
> I am running a testing box. Recently, it seems, my X settings changed
> (w/o my intentionally changing them, at least as far as I can recall) so
> that the screen resolution on Gnome, for exampl
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 07:04 am, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> > > I just installed Debian etch 40r3 on an AMD64 PC. However, screen
> > > resolution is set to 640x480.
>
> So is mine and i'm using 1024x768, how far does your monitor go? Did
> 'dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg' work?
I have the exact s
> > I just installed Debian etch 40r3 on an AMD64 PC. However, screen
> resolution is set to 640x480.
So is mine and i'm using 1024x768, how far does your monitor go? Did
'dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg' work?
--
Fica bem, porta-te mal.
Be well, misbehave.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Oscar Corte wrote:
I just installed Debian etch 40r3 on an AMD64 PC. However, screen resolution is
set to 640x480.
Video device is: NVIDIA GeForce 6150 LE
When entering:
Desktop>>Preferences>>Screen Resolution,
the only option available is 640x480
What can I do in order to set it to 1024x768
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 06:23:37PM EDT, Adam Hardy wrote:
> cga2000 on 06/06/06 00:32, wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:09:20PM EDT, Adam Hardy wrote:
> >>Jochen Schulz on 05/06/06 13:49, wrote:
> >>>Adam Hardy:
> Can I do anything to globally affect all font sizes in X, not just in
>
cga2000 on 06/06/06 00:32, wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:09:20PM EDT, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jochen Schulz on 05/06/06 13:49, wrote:
Adam Hardy:
Can I do anything to globally affect all font sizes in X, not just in the
bits that KDE controls?
[snip]
The easiest way to make sure X knows your r
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:09:20PM EDT, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Jochen Schulz on 05/06/06 13:49, wrote:
> >Adam Hardy:
> >>Can I do anything to globally affect all font sizes in X, not just in the
> >>bits that KDE controls?
> [snip]
> >
> >The easiest way to make sure X knows your real dpi:
> >
> >-
Jochen Schulz on 05/06/06 13:49, wrote:
Adam Hardy:
Can I do anything to globally affect all font sizes in X, not just in the
bits that KDE controls?
[snip]
The easiest way to make sure X knows your real dpi:
- Run this:
xdpyinfo | grep dots
resolution:92x92 dots per inch
If xd
Adam Hardy:
>
> Can I do anything to globally affect all font sizes in X, not just in the
> bits that KDE controls?
There is a quite clean way to do this. At least it works for me.
Preface:
Your problem may be that your X makes wrong assumptions about your
screen resolution. Not in absolute n
On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:42:18 +0100
Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cga2000 on 05/06/06 02:22, wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:15:59PM EDT, Adam Hardy wrote:
> >> My monitor does a maximum resolution of 1280 x 1024.
> >>
> >> I'm using KDE and it seems that the font size at this reso
cga2000 on 05/06/06 02:22, wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:15:59PM EDT, Adam Hardy wrote:
My monitor does a maximum resolution of 1280 x 1024.
I'm using KDE and it seems that the font size at this resolution is
considerably greater than it is in windows, which I use at work. So I am
trying
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:15:59PM EDT, Adam Hardy wrote:
> My monitor does a maximum resolution of 1280 x 1024.
>
> I'm using KDE and it seems that the font size at this resolution is
> considerably greater than it is in windows, which I use at work. So I am
> trying to work out what is going
Digby Tarvin wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:41:13AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to run X on my computer but i can't get desired resolution. I've
>> also review /etc/X11/xorg.conf and dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg.
>>
>> I give you some output configuration:
>>
>>
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:41:13AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to run X on my computer but i can't get desired resolution. I've
> also review /etc/X11/xorg.conf and dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg.
>
> I give you some output configuration:
>
> $ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf
On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:41, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Stephen Cormier writes:
> > Get out the manual/search online for the specifications for the
> > horizontal and
> > vertical refresh rates for the screen/monitor. Then use advanced when
> > reconfiguring and put in the values when asked, Debian
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> I strongly suspect that my screen resolution is lower than it should be:
>> everything appears very big.
>> Is there a way to check up the real performed resolution?
>> And a way to make it be what it should?
>> When I run 'dpkg-reconfigure -pmedium xserver-xfree86',
>> th
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:46:41AM +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> >> I strongly suspect that my screen resolution is lower than
> >> it should be:
> >> everything appears very big.
> >> Is there a way to check up the real performed resolution?
> >> And a way to make it b
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> I strongly suspect that my screen resolution is lower than
>> it should be:
>> everything appears very big.
>> Is there a way to check up the real performed resolution?
>> And a way to make it be what it should?
>> When I run 'dpkg-reconfigure -pmedium xserver-xfree86',
>
On Saturday 29 April 2006 18:05, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi, Debian users.
>
> I strongly suspect that my screen resolution is lower than it should be:
> everything appears very big.
> Is there a way to check up the real performed resolution?
> And a way to make it be what it should?
> When I run '
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:05:52PM +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi, Debian users.
>
> I strongly suspect that my screen resolution is lower than it should be:
> everything appears very big.
> Is there a way to check up the real performed resolution?
> And a way to make it be what it should?
> Wh
* Rodolfo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-29 23:05]:
> I strongly suspect that my screen resolution is lower than it should
> be: everything appears very big.
> Is there a way to check up the real performed resolution?
Try
$ xrandr
- Felix
--
Felix C. Stegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any su
(I'm subscribed to the list, so you don't need to send me duplicate
copies. It's also advisable to avoid top posting your replies.)
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:54:30PM +0100, Steve Sheldon wrote:
> I daren't go to the KDE desktop settings here as it will go directly to
> 800 x 600 max .. grin
Oh,
Hi,
I daren't go to the KDE desktop settings here as it will go directly to
800 x 600 max .. grin
Meanwhile though I have an Athlon 64 3000, 1Gb ram, and a Siluro GF4 MX-8X
E-Bios V4.18.20.15.0 (c)1996-2000 Nvidia 64Mb Card.
Oddly I havent had this problem before, but whether that is due to Fedora
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:56:26AM +0100, Steve Sheldon wrote:
> Where my screen resolution has always been stable under SuSE or Fedora, it
> doesnt appear to be with Debian.
Do you recall if you also used the nv driver on SuSE/Fedora, or did you
use nvidia or something else?
Also, it would prob
On 16/12/05, Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David R. Litwin wrote on Dec, 16:> > I keep trying to get Debian to load a GUI to 1280X1024 resolution. I run> > the install and select the correct driver for my video card. Then when it> > asks about my monitor I select the mediu
David R. Litwin wrote on Dec, 16:
> > I keep trying to get Debian to load a GUI to 1280X1024 resolution. I run
> > the install and select the correct driver for my video card. Then when it
> > asks about my monitor I select the medium option and select 1280X1024 @ 75.
> > I know this resolution i
On 15/12/05, Dan Sheffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I keep trying to get Debian to load a GUI to 1280X1024
resolution. I run the install and select the correct driver for
my video card. Then when it asks about my monitor I select the
medium option and select 1280X1024 @ 75. I know this resolut
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:58:51 +
Bob Hynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone remind me how to change the screen resolution in Debian when
> the "Configure - Desktop" application doesn't have the option for 1024 X
> 768? I can't get anything higher than 832 X 624 at 75Hz. I know the
> syst
You could edit XFree86 config file:
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4
--- Bob Hynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Can someone remind me how to change the screen
> resolution in Debian when
> the "Configure - Desktop" application doesn't have
> the option for 1024 X
> 768? I can't get anything higher th
Bob Hynes wrote:
Can someone remind me how to change the screen resolution in Debian when
the "Configure - Desktop" application doesn't have the option for 1024 X
768? I can't get anything higher than 832 X 624 at 75Hz. I know the
system is capable of it with Windows.
with # dpkg-reconfi
Did you try to check the X log? It usually has useful information regarding problems with the video.
LeoOn 9/14/05, Ralph Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 09/14/2005 03:10 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:> only thing I can think of is that your monitor settings aren't right.> I had similar probl
On 09/14/2005 03:10 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> only thing I can think of is that your monitor settings aren't right.
> I had similar problems for a while with my envision en-710e. my horiz
> sync and vert refresh ranges weren't right and consequently it
> couldn't get a good set-up for the
Chris Parker wrote:
<>>>
Section "Device"
Identifier "Generic Video Card"
Driver "vesa"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
# VideoRam16384
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "MX70"
HorizSync 30-70
VertRefresh 47-120
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 03:17 pm, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
> Chris Parker wrote:
> >On Tuesday 13 September 2005 01:36 pm, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
> >>Chris Parker wrote:
> >>>First off - kern = 2.6.8-2-i686
> >>>Package: xserver-xfree86
> >>>Status: install ok installed
> >>>Priority: optional
> >>>
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 03:17 pm, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
> Chris Parker wrote:
> >On Tuesday 13 September 2005 01:36 pm, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
> >>Chris Parker wrote:
> >>>First off - kern = 2.6.8-2-i686
> >>>Package: xserver-xfree86
> >>>Status: install ok installed
> >>>Priority: optional
> >>>
Chris Parker wrote:
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 01:36 pm, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
Chris Parker wrote:
First off - kern = 2.6.8-2-i686
Package: xserver-xfree86
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 15616
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
Architectur
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 01:36 pm, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
> Chris Parker wrote:
> >First off - kern = 2.6.8-2-i686
> >Package: xserver-xfree86
> >Status: install ok installed
> >Priority: optional
> >Section: x11
> >Installed-Size: 15616
> >Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
> >Architecture: i386
Chris Parker wrote:
First off - kern = 2.6.8-2-i686
Package: xserver-xfree86
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 15616
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
Architecture: i386
Source: xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
--
gn
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
