Re: Scanner recommendations

On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:46:58 -0500, vr wrote: > Can anyone recommend a current shipping quality scanner they've bought > and used with Squeeze? My Google searches return articles from 2000 and > 2003. I'd like to scan 35mm negatives, slides, some photos and regular > paper documents. I would also

Re: Scanner recommendations

On 30 Dec 2010, vr wrote: > > Can anyone recommend a current shipping quality scanner they've > bought and used with Squeeze? My Google searches return articles > from 2000 and 2003. I'd like to scan 35mm negatives, slides, some > photos and regular paper documents. > > When I looked into this

Re: Scanner recommendations

On 2010-12-30T17:24:36, vr wrote: > I'm seeing many products advertising "ICE". Have you found this to be > something desirable or perhaps maybe market hype? See and note in particular "not applicable for opaque document". I.e. you use ICE for scannin

Re: Scanner recommendations

On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:25:29 +, Chris Davies wrote: > > Have you checked http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html ? > > In terms of recommendations, my Epson 2480 is good but it's been > superceded long since. I get good results from current HP multifunction > devices at work (network conn

Re: Scanner recommendations

vr wrote: > Can anyone recommend a current shipping quality scanner they've bought > and used with Squeeze? My Google searches return articles from 2000 and > 2003. I'd like to scan 35mm negatives, slides, some photos and regular > paper documents. Have you checked http://www.sane-project.org/

Re: Scanner recommendations?

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:24:01PM -0600, Dennis Wicks wrote: > Greetings; > > Does anyone have any recommendations for a decent scanner that will work > on Debian? > > Something with a hires of at least 1200dpi and OCR. The ability to scan > slides and color and B&W negs of all sizes would be a

Re: Scanner Recommendations

* Ayman Haidar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if anybody could recommend a scanner to work with Linux. I > would like one that would be used in a small office with medium load (may be > 50-100 pages / day). Obviously I need one with an auto feeder. > I have an Epson Perf

Re: scanner recommendations?

Jens Gecius wrote: pirmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: 1. 3200dpi, totalling a whopping 171.6MB took 682 seconds (ca. 260kB/s) 2. 300dpi, totalling 1.5MB took 73 seconds (ca. 21kB/s) Thank you! And how long does a b/w lineart page A4 with 150dpi take? Totalling 2.1 MB, it took 45 seconds,

Re: scanner recommendations?

pirmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 1. >> 3200dpi, totalling a whopping 171.6MB took 682 seconds (ca. 260kB/s) >> 2. >> 300dpi, totalling 1.5MB took 73 seconds (ca. 21kB/s) > > Thank you! And how long does a b/w lineart page A4 with 150dpi take? Totalling 2.1 MB, it took 45 seconds, of which th

Re: scanner recommendations?

philip baratta wrote: Anthony Campbell wrote: On 18 Dec 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote: I recently bought an Epson Perfection 1650 which is working perfectly I am impressed by an Epson 1640 Perfections's speed at work in a Win2k environment I have an Epson 640U; although it is on the list

Re: scanner recommendations?

1. 3200dpi, totalling a whopping 171.6MB took 682 seconds (ca. 260kB/s) 2. 300dpi, totalling 1.5MB took 73 seconds (ca. 21kB/s) Thank you! And how long does a b/w lineart page A4 with 150dpi take? -- Andreas von Heydwolff

Re: scanner recommendations?

pirmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On 18 Dec 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote: > >> I recently bought an Epson Perfection 1650 which is working perfectly > > I am impressed by an Epson 1640 Perfections's speed at work in a Win2k > environment, connectted to the USB port. In the vendors' lists they > no

Re: scanner recommendations?

pirmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On 18 Dec 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote: > >> I recently bought an Epson Perfection 1650 which is working perfectly > > I am impressed by an Epson 1640 Perfections's speed at work in a Win2k > environment, connectted to the USB port. In the vendors' lists they > no

Re: scanner recommendations?

Anthony Campbell wrote: On 18 Dec 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote: I recently bought an Epson Perfection 1650 which is working perfectly I am impressed by an Epson 1640 Perfections's speed at work in a Win2k environment, connectted to the USB port. In the vendors' lists they now have the 1650s.

Re: scanner recommendations?

On 18 Dec 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote: > Hello, > > Can anyone recommend a decent, low-priced scanner that works with their > debian system? In case it matters, I'm tracking sid. > > I've been browsing amazon's scanners and simultaneously the SANE > compatibility lists, so I should be able to find s

Re: scanner recommendations?

shock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Can anyone recommend a decent, low-priced scanner that works with their >> debian system? In case it matters, I'm tracking sid. > > i'm using an epson 1240u flatbed on debian woody with no problems > whatsoever. i think epson is (or has) phased out the 1240u,

Re: scanner recommendations?

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote: > > Can anyone recommend a decent, low-priced scanner that works with their > debian system? In case it matters, I'm tracking sid. i'm using an epson 1240u flatbed on debian woody with no problems whatsoever. i think epson is (or has) phased out the 1240u,

Re: scanner recommendations?

Well, I don't know if you have access to such a facility, but at Penn State, there is a place called Salvage, where old (and sometimes non-functional) equipment goes. People may then buy this old equipment. I purchased three scanners from them and the last one worked ($15 each). It is an HP Scan

Re: scanner recommendations?

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote: > Hello, > > Can anyone recommend a decent, low-priced scanner that works with their > debian system? In case it matters, I'm tracking sid. What are you scanning? -jwb