Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-24 Thread Joe
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:59:12 -0400 Default User wrote: > > Thanks to all for the information. > > In regard to Brian's request for more information, my use case is > mostly just trying to digitize decades of personal paper documents, > such as letters, pictures, greeting cards, etc. > And also

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-24 Thread Default User
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:27 AM Russell wrote: > > Brian wrote: > > > As with all of these asking for recommendations type questions, there > > is little detail provided. For example, do you want a standalone scanner > > or would an MFD suit? > > > > sane-airscan supports all modern MFDs. Shoppi

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-22 Thread Russell
Brian wrote: > As with all of these asking for recommendations type questions, there > is little detail provided. For example, do you want a standalone scanner > or would an MFD suit? > > sane-airscan supports all modern MFDs. Shopping online would allow you > to submit your preferred choice he

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-19 Thread Brian
On Mon 19 Apr 2021 at 14:02:22 -0400, Default User wrote: [...} > Okay, thanks guys! > > Now it's either: > 1 - shop online, buy something sight-unseen, and hope it works, or > 2 - shop by visiting one or more of the few physical stores remaining, and > risk dying of Covid-19 or its mutations.

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-19 Thread Default User
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 09:12 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:48:12AM +0200, john doe wrote: > >You could choose a scanner that is 'complete'ly supported from the Sane > >(1) project > > > >1) www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#SCANNERS > > Excellent advice. For this reason I

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-19 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:48:12AM +0200, john doe wrote: You could choose a scanner that is 'complete'ly supported from the Sane (1) project 1) www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#SCANNERS Excellent advice. For this reason I recently bought a 2nd-hand Canon LiDE 25 and I'm perfectly happy wi

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-19 Thread Brian
On Mon 19 Apr 2021 at 09:31:47 +0200, Klaus Jantzen wrote: [...] > I am using a CanoScan LiDE 400. I bought it because they have a (very > simple) Linux support. > > The software is a not very clever but works nicely. The images (jpg, pdf) > are good. There are a lot of buttons on the machine bu

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-19 Thread Klaus Jantzen
On 4/18/21 9:57 PM, Default User wrote: Hi! It may be time for a new scanner. For years I have used a Visioneer OneTouch 7100 usb flatbed scanner on various x86 computers running various versions of Debian and simple-scan. Currently: Debian Unstable (updated, of course) Linux 5.10.0-6-amd64 #1

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-18 Thread deloptes
Gregory Seidman wrote: > It's a cheap workhorse. I haven't tried it with Linux but it doesn't > require any special software or drivers on macOS, which makes me think it > is entirely open standard. and how do you operate it on mac? and why you are posting when you are not sure it works under lin

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-18 Thread john doe
On 4/18/2021 9:57 PM, Default User wrote: Hi! It may be time for a new scanner. For years I have used a Visioneer OneTouch 7100 usb flatbed scanner on various x86 computers running various versions of Debian and simple-scan. Currently: Debian Unstable (updated, of course) Linux 5.10.0-6-amd64

Re: scanner recommendation

2021-04-18 Thread Gregory Seidman
https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/products/details/scanners/photo-scanner/canoscan-lide-110 It's a cheap workhorse. I haven't tried it with Linux but it doesn't require any special software or drivers on macOS, which makes me think it is entirely open standard. --Gregory On Sun,

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Brian
On Sun 24 Nov 2019 at 18:56:38 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: > > > *Except* models.dat also has > > > > scan-type=5 > > > > This type is SOAP2, a proprietary protocol, which needs the plugin. > > I actually found this line, but you really need to be be a

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Brian
On Sun 24 Nov 2019 at 19:02:14 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: > > > Your device is supported since HPLIP 3.16.1. Debian has packages in > > stretch, buster and unstable to suit you, so there should be no need > > to install the latest from HPLIP. Time and time a

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Pierre Frenkiel
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: Your device is supported since HPLIP 3.16.1. Debian has packages in stretch, buster and unstable to suit you, so there should be no need to install the latest from HPLIP. Time and time again I see users doing this and making problems for themselves. I am on

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Pierre Frenkiel
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: *Except* models.dat also has scan-type=5 This type is SOAP2, a proprietary protocol, which needs the plugin. I actually found this line, but you really need to be be a guru to understand what it implies! (you can't rely on Google for that) Sometimes,

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Brian
On Sun 24 Nov 2019 at 17:30:07 +, Brian wrote: > On Sun 24 Nov 2019 at 18:11:23 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: > > > > > Install with > > > > > > sh hplip-3.19.11-plugin.run > > > >thank you Brian for this tip. It worked perfectly. > >your li

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Brian
On Sun 24 Nov 2019 at 18:11:23 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: > > > Install with > > > > sh hplip-3.19.11-plugin.run > >thank you Brian for this tip. It worked perfectly. >your link is actually better than the one I found with Google: > >https://

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Pierre Frenkiel
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: Install with sh hplip-3.19.11-plugin.run thank you Brian for this tip. It worked perfectly. your link is actually better than the one I found with Google: https://www.openprinting.org/download/printdriver/auxfiles/HP/plugins/ where the most rec

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Brian
On Sun 24 Nov 2019 at 17:39:05 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: > > > Do you have the plugin installed? > > I looked on the HP web site, and found hundreds of plugins, but no one > for my printer ... Depends where you looked. There is a single plugin file fo

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Pierre Frenkiel
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: Do you have the plugin installed? I looked on the HP web site, and found hundreds of plugins, but no one for my printer ...

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Brian
On Sun 24 Nov 2019 at 17:06:11 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: > > > What version of HPLIP? > > hplip-3.19.11 > installed with configure/make/make install Do you have the plugin installed? -- Brian.

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Pierre Frenkiel
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Brian wrote: What version of HPLIP? hplip-3.19.11 installed with configure/make/make install best regards, -- Pierre Frenkiel

Re: scanner problem

2019-11-24 Thread Brian
On Sun 24 Nov 2019 at 16:50:50 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > hi, > I have a problem when trying to scan with my usb printer > HP_LaserJet_MFP_M227-M231. > Printing works perfectly, but trying to scan gives: > > error: SANE: Error during device I/O (code=9) > > When I run hp-check or hp-do

Re: Scanner not working

2019-01-04 Thread Brian
On Fri 04 Jan 2019 at 13:28:17 +, Andrew Wood wrote: > On 04/01/2019 00:31, deloptes wrote: > > > Don't have it but quick google told me this could be related to you > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1080787 > > > > there is patch down there for 5370 - cou

Re: Scanner not working

2019-01-04 Thread Brian
On Fri 04 Jan 2019 at 13:28:17 +, Andrew Wood wrote: > On 04/01/2019 00:31, deloptes wrote: > > > Don't have it but quick google told me this could be related to you > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1080787 > > > > there is patch down there for 5370 - cou

Re: Scanner not working

2019-01-04 Thread Andrew Wood
On 04/01/2019 00:31, deloptes wrote: Don't have it but quick google told me this could be related to you https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1080787 there is patch down there for 5370 - could be they have same usb ids regards Thanks, yes that does look like i

Re: Scanner not working

2019-01-03 Thread deloptes
Andrew Wood wrote: > I have a long standing problem with using my scanner (HP ScanJet 5300) > under Debian using either Simple Scan or gscantopdf. Both generate I/O > error messages. It used to work fine but have never been able to get it > to work since upgrading to Jessie and now in Stretch it d

Re: Scanner not working

2019-01-03 Thread Siard
Andrew Wood wrote: > I have a long standing problem with using my scanner (HP ScanJet 5300) > under Debian using either Simple Scan or gscantopdf. > [...] > Any suggestions on how I might identify what the problem is? You could install the newbiedoc package. Section 5, 'Help with multimedia in Deb

Re: Scanner Compatibility question

2017-10-25 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:02:28PM +, J.W. Foster wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone here has used or been able to install a > scanner model: Canon - 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - I personally use said model with a Debian testing box. It works perfectly, though I've never tried the 4-channel

Re: Scanner Compatibility question

2017-10-25 Thread Brian
On Tue 24 Oct 2017 at 20:02:28 +, J.W. Foster wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone here has used or been able to install a > scanner model: Canon - 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - BlackI am > currently trying to decide if I can use this scanner with current > debian stable.  There is not much onli

Re: Scanner Compatibility question

2017-10-25 Thread Thomas Amm
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:02:28 + (UTC) "J.W. Foster" wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone here has used or been able to install a > scanner model: Canon - 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - BlackI am > currently trying to decide if I can use this scanner with current > debian stable.  There is not muc

Re: Scanner Compatibility question

2017-10-24 Thread Dan Ritter
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:02:28PM +, J.W. Foster wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone here has used or been able to install a scanner > model: Canon - 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - BlackI am currently trying to > decide if I can use this scanner with current debian stable.  There is not > muc

Re: Scanner problem

2017-09-13 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:32:34AM +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: Should I reportbug to libsane to add it in 60-libsane.rules? Because if I add in /etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules as mentioned by the doc, it no longer detects my EPSON (bcecause it bypasses /lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rule

Re: Scanner problem

2017-09-13 Thread Brian
On Wed 13 Sep 2017 at 08:32:34 +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: > Many thanks for your help guys, it works. The exact line: > > ATTRS{idVendor}=="04a9", ATTRS{idProduct}=="190e", > ENV{libsane_matched}="yes" > > > Should I /reportbug to libsane to add it in 60-libsane.rules? Because if > I a

Re: Scanner problem

2017-09-12 Thread MENGUAL Jean-Philippe
Hi, Many thanks for your help guys, it works. The exact line: ATTRS{idVendor}=="04a9", ATTRS{idProduct}=="190e", ENV{libsane_matched}="yes" Should I /reportbug to libsane to add it in 60-libsane.rules? Because if I add in /etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules as mentioned by the doc, it no longer

Re: Scanner problem

2017-09-12 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:37:16AM +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: I added: ATTRS{idvendor}=="04a9", ATTRS{idProduct}="190e", ENV{libsane_matched}="yes" Was it actually "idvendor" instead of "idVendor"? Mike Stone

Re: Scanner problem

2017-09-12 Thread MENGUAL Jean-Philippe
>> FYI (and without I do any configuration anywhere, I just plug in scanners): >> getfacl /dev/bus/usb/001/031: >> >> Canon: >> getfacl : suppression du premier « / » des noms de chemins absolus >> # file: dev/bus/usb/001/031 >> # owner: root >> # group: root >> user::rw- >> group::rw- >> other::r-

Re: Scanner problem

2017-09-12 Thread Brian
On Tue 12 Sep 2017 at 21:21:33 +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: > Le 12/09/2017 à 11:22, Brian a écrit : > > On Mon 11 Sep 2017 at 19:23:09 +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: > > > >> Two scanners: 1=Epson; 2=canon. 1 works fine, as root and as user. Canon > >> works as root but not as user,

Re: Scanner problem

2017-09-12 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:21:33PM +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: We have Epson Perfection 3490 and Canon Lide 120. While /dev/bus/usb/001/0XX is owned by root:root,, but as well by the scanner group (where my user is), it is not the case with Canon, the device is owned only by root:root.

Re: Scanner problem

2017-09-12 Thread MENGUAL Jean-Philippe
Hi, Le 12/09/2017 à 11:22, Brian a écrit : > On Mon 11 Sep 2017 at 19:23:09 +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: > >> Two scanners: 1=Epson; 2=canon. 1 works fine, as root and as user. Canon >> works as root but not as user, scanimage and sane-find-scanner do not >> find it. > > Do we assume you

Re: Scanner problem

2017-09-12 Thread Brian
On Mon 11 Sep 2017 at 19:23:09 +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: > Two scanners: 1=Epson; 2=canon. 1 works fine, as root and as user. Canon > works as root but not as user, scanimage and sane-find-scanner do not > find it. Do we assume your system is a stretch one? Please post the model names o

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-03 Thread Frank McCormick
On 03/08/15 09:44 AM, Johann Spies wrote: I found that I could not use my Lide (I think it is a 10 - I am not at home right now) on USB-3 ports but it works without a problem on USB-2. Try all the ports on your computer. Regards Johann On 1 August 2015 at 17:26, Frank McCormick mailto:debianl..

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-03 Thread Johann Spies
I found that I could not use my Lide (I think it is a 10 - I am not at home right now) on USB-3 ports but it works without a problem on USB-2. Try all the ports on your computer. Regards Johann On 1 August 2015 at 17:26, Frank McCormick wrote: > It's been a while since I used the Canon LIDE 20

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-01 Thread Frank McCormick
On 01/08/15 05:23 PM, Joe wrote: On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:30:40 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: Wish it were that simple in my case.nothing in syslog indicates the system even realizes the scanner is attached. I tied attaching it to my wife win7 only machine and nothing happens. Like I said.

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-01 Thread Cindy-Sue Causey
On 8/1/15, Frank McCormick wrote: > > I tied attaching it to my wife win7 only machine and nothing happens. > > Like I said...it appears to be did Jim :) *heh!* Dadburn autocorrect... Blows a great punchline nearly every time In other news... *I*... got to *bear hug* him once... No fib... H

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-01 Thread Joe
On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:30:40 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: > > Wish it were that simple in my case.nothing in syslog indicates the > system even realizes the scanner is attached. > > I tied attaching it to my wife win7 only machine and nothing happens. > > Like I said...it appears to be did

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-01 Thread Frank McCormick
On 01/08/15 01:23 PM, Joe wrote: On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 12:13:43 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: On 01/08/2015 11:29 AM, Nicolas George wrote: Le quartidi 14 thermidor, an CCXXIII, Frank McCormick a écrit : LSUSB doesn't find it on the scan of USB ports. I suspect the kernel module is not being lo

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-01 Thread Joe
On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 12:13:43 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: > On 01/08/2015 11:29 AM, Nicolas George wrote: > > Le quartidi 14 thermidor, an CCXXIII, Frank McCormick a écrit : > >> LSUSB doesn't find it on the scan of USB ports. I suspect the > >> kernel module is not being loaded. > > An USB devic

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-01 Thread Frank McCormick
On 01/08/2015 11:29 AM, Nicolas George wrote: Le quartidi 14 thermidor, an CCXXIII, Frank McCormick a écrit : LSUSB doesn't find it on the scan of USB ports. I suspect the kernel module is not being loaded. An USB devices appears on the bus even without kernel module. Look at dmesg; nowadays,

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-01 Thread Martin Read
On 01/08/15 16:26, Frank McCormick wrote: It's been a while since I used the Canon LIDE 20 scanner attached to my Debian Sid system. Today I found out it's not being recognized. LSUSB doesn't find it on the scan of USB ports. Have you checked that the cable is good? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: scanner not recognized

2015-08-01 Thread Nicolas George
Le quartidi 14 thermidor, an CCXXIII, Frank McCormick a écrit : > LSUSB doesn't find it on the scan of USB ports. I suspect the kernel > module is not being loaded. An USB devices appears on the bus even without kernel module. Look at dmesg; nowadays, "dmesg -w" is quite convenient: start it, hit

udevadm 'trigger' vs 'control --reload-rules' (was ... Re: scanner claimed by usbfs)

2013-08-25 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:11:32AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > Perhaps you or someone else could explain to me the difference between > udevadm trigger > and > udevadm control --reload-rules > and the circumstances under which each is appropriate? Didn't know about 'udevadm control --reload-rules

Re: scanner claimed by usbfs

2013-08-25 Thread Ross Boylan
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:40:36PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > > I was briefly able to use my scanner, but while the scanner application > > (Skanlite) was running it became inaccessible. About that time the logs > > show > > Aug 24 11:46

Re: scanner and usb-2 usb-3 connections

2013-08-25 Thread Curt
On 2013-08-18, François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, > > 1- > I have usb2 and usb3 ports on my computer. When I plug my usb2 scanner > in an usb3 port, xsane cannot start. > > Is it correct? My (usb2) mouse and keyboard work perfectly when plugged > in an usb3 port. Do we assume your usb2 scanner work

Re: scanner claimed by usbfs

2013-08-25 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:40:36PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > I was briefly able to use my scanner, but while the scanner application > (Skanlite) was running it became inaccessible. About that time the logs > show > Aug 24 11:46:03 tempserver kernel: [6950936.545558] usb 3-1.2: usbfs: > interfac

Re: Scanner stopped working

2011-02-03 Thread briand
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:55:48 -0800 Marc Shapiro wrote: > I have an Epson Stylus 7450 All-In-One type printer. The last time > that I tried to scan anything, a few months ago, everything worked > just fine. I did my scanning from within the GIMP. Yesterday, when I > tried to scan a document, it

Re: Scanner recommendations

2010-12-31 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:46:58 -0500, vr wrote: > Can anyone recommend a current shipping quality scanner they've bought > and used with Squeeze? My Google searches return articles from 2000 and > 2003. I'd like to scan 35mm negatives, slides, some photos and regular > paper documents. I would also

Re: Scanner recommendations

2010-12-31 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 30 Dec 2010, vr wrote: > > Can anyone recommend a current shipping quality scanner they've > bought and used with Squeeze? My Google searches return articles > from 2000 and 2003. I'd like to scan 35mm negatives, slides, some > photos and regular paper documents. > > When I looked into this

Re: Scanner recommendations

2010-12-30 Thread Allan Wind
On 2010-12-30T17:24:36, vr wrote: > I'm seeing many products advertising "ICE". Have you found this to be > something desirable or perhaps maybe market hype? See and note in particular "not applicable for opaque document". I.e. you use ICE for scannin

Re: Scanner recommendations

2010-12-30 Thread vr
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:25:29 +, Chris Davies wrote: > > Have you checked http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html ? > > In terms of recommendations, my Epson 2480 is good but it's been > superceded long since. I get good results from current HP multifunction > devices at work (network conn

Re: Scanner recommendations

2010-12-30 Thread Chris Davies
vr wrote: > Can anyone recommend a current shipping quality scanner they've bought > and used with Squeeze? My Google searches return articles from 2000 and > 2003. I'd like to scan 35mm negatives, slides, some photos and regular > paper documents. Have you checked http://www.sane-project.org/

Re: scanner access not easy

2009-06-02 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <20090602014330.59bf4...@torfree.net>, Mark Grieveson wrote: >I'm using Etch, with fluxbox. Here is some information: > >m...@debian:~$ sane-find-scanner > >found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [Hewlett-Packard], product=0x0201 [HP >ScanJet 6200C]) at libusb:001:004 > >debian:/home/mark# scanimage

[SOLVED] Re: scanner access not easy

2009-06-02 Thread Mark Grieveson
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:53:03 + (UTC) debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote: > I have an HP ScanJet 6200C usb scanner, which used to work. It > stopped working, for some reason. Never mind. I did get it working. It seems I had forgotten to try the ever important step of first un

Re: scanner stop working after update

2009-03-13 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rainer Kluge wrote: > 1) dpkg --force-conflicts -i iscan_2.17.0-3_i386.deb > 2) dpkg -i iscan-plugin-gt-_2.1.0-2_i386.deb # depends on scanner > type > 3) manually delete the iscan and iscan-plugin entries in /var/lib/dpkg/status FWIW, I did

Re: scanner stop working after update

2009-03-13 Thread Rainer Kluge
thveillon.debian schrieb: > > Hi, this is what apt-listchanges sent me a few days ago : > > [quote] > "sane-backends-extras (1.0.19.12) unstable; urgency=low > > Starting with sane-backends-extras 1.0.19.12, the epkowa backend for EPSON > scanners is no longer provided. It was no longer poss

Re: scanner stop working after update

2009-03-13 Thread thveillon.debian
>Rainer Kluge wrote : > Enrique Morfin schrieb: >> My system is sid. >> The scanner is epson perfection v100 photo >> >> It was working flawlessly (with iscan). > > Hello, > > Which backend do you use: the one provided by the official Debian > libsane-extras > package or the one from the Avasys

Re: scanner stop working after update

2009-03-13 Thread Rainer Kluge
Enrique Morfin schrieb: > > My system is sid. > The scanner is epson perfection v100 photo > > It was working flawlessly (with iscan). Hello, Which backend do you use: the one provided by the official Debian libsane-extras package or the one from the Avasys proprietary packages (iscan, iscan-pl

Re: Scanner problems

2009-03-03 Thread Frank
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:12 +0100, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote: > Op Sun, 01 Mar 18:35:46 -0500 Frank wrote: > > Just installed Debian squeeze...and am looking for help. Seems xsane > > will only run as root...made myself a member of scanner group, but > > still have to run gksudo to get it to find the s

Re: Scanner problems

2009-03-03 Thread Sjoerd Hiemstra
Op Sun, 01 Mar 18:35:46 -0500 Frank wrote: > Just installed Debian squeeze...and am looking for help. Seems xsane > will only run as root...made myself a member of scanner group, but > still have to run gksudo to get it to find the scanner. > > Advice ?? I'd suggest to follow the steps for scanne

Re: Scanner Needs Root Access?

2009-03-01 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On 1 March 2009 15:06:15 Kent West wrote: > Andrew Malcolmson wrote: > > Thierry Chatelet wrote: > > [snip] > > > >> lp does not need to be in scanner group. I know it does not help, but... > >> Did you try to log out and back in since you put yourself in scanner > >> group? > > > > or to avoid nee

Re: Scanner Needs Root Access?

2009-03-01 Thread Kent West
Andrew Malcolmson wrote: > Thierry Chatelet wrote: > [snip] >> lp does not need to be in scanner group. I know it does not help, but... >> Did you try to log out and back in since you put yourself in scanner >> group? >> > > or to avoid needing to log out and back in, run > > newgrp [groupname] > >

Re: Scanner Needs Root Access?

2009-03-01 Thread Andrew Malcolmson
Thierry Chatelet wrote: [snip] lp does not need to be in scanner group. I know it does not help, but... Did you try to log out and back in since you put yourself in scanner group? or to avoid needing to log out and back in, run newgrp [groupname] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ

Re: Scanner Needs Root Access?

2009-02-27 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On 28 February 2009 07:42:05 Scarletdown wrote: > On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 07:32 +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote: > > On 28 February 2009 06:28:39 Scarletdown wrote: > > > # EPSON Stylus NX300 | EPSON Stylus NX300 | EPSON Stylus NX300 > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="04b8", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0848", MODE="660",

Re: Scanner Needs Root Access?

2009-02-27 Thread Scarletdown
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 07:32 +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote: > On 28 February 2009 06:28:39 Scarletdown wrote: > > # EPSON Stylus NX300 | EPSON Stylus NX300 | EPSON Stylus NX300 > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="04b8", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0848", MODE="660", > > OWNER="lp", GROUP="scanner", ENV{libsane_matched}="y

Re: Scanner Needs Root Access?

2009-02-27 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On 28 February 2009 06:28:39 Scarletdown wrote: > I was recently given a brand new Epson Stylus NX300 Printer/Scanner/Fax, > and have been trying to get it all working properly. Printer functions > are working fine. For the scanning functions, I installed the iscan > package. The device is scann

Re: Scanner recommendations?

2009-02-03 Thread Alex Samad
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:24:01PM -0600, Dennis Wicks wrote: > Greetings; > > Does anyone have any recommendations for a decent scanner that will work > on Debian? > > Something with a hires of at least 1200dpi and OCR. The ability to scan > slides and color and B&W negs of all sizes would be a

Re: scanner problem

2007-08-04 Thread Jeff
Andrew J. Barr wrote: On 8/5/07, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My Cannon Lide 20 scanner does not work on Etch. It only works if i start it as root. Is there an easy way to fix this? Thanks Jeff You need to add yourself to the 'scanner' group. As root, run: gpasswd -a scanner bei

Re: scanner problem

2007-08-04 Thread Andrew J. Barr
On 8/5/07, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My Cannon Lide 20 scanner does not work on Etch. It only works if i > start it as root. Is there an easy way to fix this? > Thanks > Jeff You need to add yourself to the 'scanner' group. As root, run: gpasswd -a scanner being your username. -- An

Re: Scanner rights messed up: please help!

2006-08-24 Thread Christof Hurschler
Von: Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:06:03 +0100, Wackojacko wrote: > > Christof Hurschler wrote: > > >>On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:10, Christof Hurschler shared this with > us > > >>all: > > >>>--> No one responded to my last post, so I'll try it again. A > previ

Re: Scanner rights messed up: please help!

2006-08-24 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:06:03 +0100, Wackojacko wrote: > Christof Hurschler wrote: > >>On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:10, Christof Hurschler shared this with us > >>all: > >>>--> No one responded to my last post, so I'll try it again. A previously > >>>working scanner is no longer accessible for

Re: Scanner rights messed up: please help!

2006-08-24 Thread Wackojacko
Christof Hurschler wrote: Von: M-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:10, Christof Hurschler shared this with us all: --> No one responded to my last post, so I'll try it again. A previously working scanner is no longer accessible for the group "scanner". It works under root.

Re: Scanner rights messed up: please help!

2006-08-24 Thread Christof Hurschler
Von: M-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:10, Christof Hurschler shared this with us > all: > >--> No one responded to my last post, so I'll try it again. A previously > > working scanner is no longer accessible for the group "scanner". It > works > > under root. Something see

Fwd: Re: Scanner rights messed up: please help!

2006-08-24 Thread Christof Hurschler
Von: M-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:10, Christof Hurschler shared this with us > all: > >--> No one responded to my last post, so I'll try it again. A previously > > working scanner is no longer accessible for the group "scanner". It > works > > under root. Something see

Re: Scanner rights messed up: please help!

2006-08-24 Thread M-L
On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:10, Christof Hurschler shared this with us all: >--> No one responded to my last post, so I'll try it again. A previously > working scanner is no longer accessible for the group "scanner". It works > under root. Something seems to have changed in a recent dist-upgra

Re: Subject: Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-27 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, steef wrote: > and, indeed, as you suggested: hplip0.9.7 contains a driver for the > psc1400 series. > > so: > > i can print now: printer worls like a dream. > i can copy now: works like a dream as well. > > but: > > i cannot (yet) scan and put the result of scanning as a

Re: Subject: Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-27 Thread steef
steef wrote: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, steef wrote: thanks! got the 1402_scanner working with *unfree* software. of course i prefer the debian way. give your advice a try. Try hplip from backports.org. Or wait a few weeks until I deem 0.9.9 good enough

Re: Subject: Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-27 Thread steef
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, steef wrote: thanks! got the 1402_scanner working with *unfree* software. of course i prefer the debian way. give your advice a try. Try hplip from backports.org. Or wait a few weeks until I deem 0.9.9 good enough for backportin

Re: Subject: Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-26 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, steef wrote: > thanks! got the 1402_scanner working with *unfree* software. of course > i prefer the debian way. give your advice a try. Try hplip from backports.org. Or wait a few weeks until I deem 0.9.9 good enough for backporting, if the one in backports.org is too old

Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-26 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, steef wrote: > as far as i know is hpijs kind of *built in* in hplip: hplip is a > follow-up for hpijs. As a project, yes. As an utility, sort of. HPIJS works without the HPLIP system in reduced capabilities mode, but it is still part of the HPLIP project. And it has nothin

[Fwd: Re: Subject: Re: scanner hp psc1402]

2006-03-26 Thread steef
Original Message Subject:Re: Subject: Re: scanner hp psc1402 Resent-Date:Sun, 26 Mar 2006 02:10:53 -0600 (CST) Resent-From:debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:11:22 +0200 From: steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PRO

Re: Subject: Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-26 Thread steef
Gayle Lee Fairless wrote: Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote: On Sat, March 25, 2006 13:19, steef said: hello folks, samebody out there who can tell me how to get the scanner of a hp psc1402 working? (tried out sane, xsane and the like already: without success and googling was of no help. pr

Subject: Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-25 Thread Gayle Lee Fairless
Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote: On Sat, March 25, 2006 13:19, steef said: hello folks, samebody out there who can tell me how to get the scanner of a hp psc1402 working? (tried out sane, xsane and the like already: without success and googling was of no help. printer etc. works excellent

Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-25 Thread Ernst-Magne Vindal
On Sat, March 25, 2006 21:16, steef said: > Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote: >> On Sat, March 25, 2006 13:19, steef said: >> >>> hello folks, >>> >>> samebody out there who can tell me how to get the scanner of a hp >>> psc1402 >>> working? >>> >>> (tried out sane, xsane and the like already: without suc

Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-25 Thread steef
Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote: On Sat, March 25, 2006 13:19, steef said: hello folks, samebody out there who can tell me how to get the scanner of a hp psc1402 working? (tried out sane, xsane and the like already: without success and googling was of no help. printer etc. works excellent with hpl

Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-25 Thread steef
Bruno Buys wrote: steef wrote: hello folks, samebody out there who can tell me how to get the scanner of a hp psc1402 working? (tried out sane, xsane and the like already: without success and googling was of no help. printer etc. works excellent with hplip) regards, steef Hi stee

Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-25 Thread Ernst-Magne Vindal
On Sat, March 25, 2006 17:26, Andrew Sackville-West said: > On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:33:44 +0100 (CET) > "Ernst-Magne Vindal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] >> > >> >> Hi, not sure about psc1402, but for my psc2175 I use vuescan, very nice >> and many options for scanning and output format. >

Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-25 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:33:44 +0100 (CET) "Ernst-Magne Vindal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > > Hi, not sure about psc1402, but for my psc2175 I use vuescan, very nice > and many options for scanning and output format. Do you find that you need to stop the printing service before a scan?

Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-25 Thread Bruno Buys
steef wrote: hello folks, samebody out there who can tell me how to get the scanner of a hp psc1402 working? (tried out sane, xsane and the like already: without success and googling was of no help. printer etc. works excellent with hplip) regards, steef Hi steef, I had a psc1315

Re: scanner hp psc1402

2006-03-25 Thread Ernst-Magne Vindal
On Sat, March 25, 2006 13:19, steef said: > > hello folks, > > samebody out there who can tell me how to get the scanner of a hp psc1402 > working? > > (tried out sane, xsane and the like already: without success and googling > was of no help. printer etc. works excellent with hplip) > > regards,

Re: scanner permissions

2006-03-12 Thread Matthew R. Dempsky
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:49:19PM +0100, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote: > First of all, "topposting".. While we're on the topic of email etiquette, perhaps we could discuss pruning quotations to the bare minimum. Top posting, while obnoxious, is not as bad as having to scroll down two pages bef

  1   2   >