Re: SAMBA problems on Debian 8.8

2017-07-17 Thread Frank Miles
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 17:10:03 +0200, Jason Wittlin-Cohen wrote: > You are running an out-of-date version of samba (2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u6 > vs. 4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7+b1). In addition, you seem to be missing > samba-common-bin, samba-dsdb-modules, and python-samba, all of which are > dependencies

Re: SAMBA problems on Debian 8.8

2017-07-16 Thread Marc Shapiro
On 07/15/2017 08:09 AM, Jason Wittlin-Cohen wrote: You are running an out-of-date version of samba (2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u6 vs. 4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7+b1). In addition, you seem to be missing samba-common-bin, samba-dsdb-modules, and python-samba, all of which are dependencies of samba. Try '

[SOLVED (mostly)] Re: SAMBA problems on Debian 8.8

2017-07-15 Thread Hans Kraus
Thanks a lot to all who have helped and/or contemplated my problem. After: --- apt-get install --reinstall samba apt-get install samba-dbg samba-doc ---

Re: SAMBA problems on Debian 8.8

2017-07-15 Thread Jason Wittlin-Cohen
BTW, here is what I see when I run dpkg -l | grep samba: jason@storage-server:~$ dpkg -l | grep samba ii python-samba 2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7+b1 amd64Python bindings for Samba ii samba 2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7+b1 amd64

Re: SAMBA problems on Debian 8.8

2017-07-15 Thread Jason Wittlin-Cohen
You are running an out-of-date version of samba (2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u6 vs. 4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7+b1). In addition, you seem to be missing samba-common-bin, samba-dsdb-modules, and python-samba, all of which are dependencies of samba. Try 'sudo apt-get install --reinstall samba' If that doesn't

Re: SAMBA problems on Debian 8.8

2017-07-15 Thread Hans Kraus
Am 15.07.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Ulf Volmer: On 15.07.2017 13:56, Hans Kraus wrote: yesterday, 14. July, about 9:30 pm my SAMBA shares on Debian simply stopped working. I did not do anything on the system. There were samba updates for jessie yesterday. First one was broken on some systems so ma

Re: SAMBA problems on Debian 8.8

2017-07-15 Thread Hans Kraus
Am 15.07.2017 um 16:05 schrieb Jason Wittlin-Cohen: What does 'dpkg -l | grep samba' show? On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Hans Kraus > wrote: Am 15.07.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Jason Wittlin-Cohen: Did you run an apt-get dist-upgrade yesterday? Debian

Re: SAMBA problems on Debian 8.8

2017-07-15 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 15.07.2017 13:56, Hans Kraus wrote: > yesterday, 14. July, about 9:30 pm my SAMBA shares on Debian simply > stopped working. I did not do anything on the system. There were samba updates for jessie yesterday. First one was broken on some systems so maybe it will help to do an upgrade again. >

Re: SAMBA problems on Debian 8.8

2017-07-15 Thread Dejan Jocic
On 15-07-17, Hans Kraus wrote: > Hi, > > yesterday, 14. July, about 9:30 pm my SAMBA shares on Debian simply > stopped working. I did not do anything on the system. > > When I now try to connect to them from Windows 8.1 I do not see them > in the "Connect Network Drive" window. > > When I enter

Re: SAMBA problems

2008-09-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:31 +0100, Gerard Hooton wrote: > Hello All, > We are using Samba to provide a windows Domain login > The problem is that some of the users that I create (using smbpasswd -a > are not working when I do a login from the windows machines(RPC errors) > and some work fine. Is

Re: Samba problems.

2002-09-05 Thread Mike Dresser
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, R. Bradley Tilley (Brad) wrote: > AMANDA uses smbclient. In my experience with smbclient and AMANDA, it > has never behaved in the manner that you describe smbmount and smbtar. > Try using smbclient. smbtar merely calls smbclient though. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Samba problems.

2002-09-05 Thread R. Bradley Tilley (Brad)
AMANDA uses smbclient. In my experience with smbclient and AMANDA, it has never behaved in the manner that you describe smbmount and smbtar. Try using smbclient. Mike Dresser wrote: >Any work arounds for the problems with smbmount and smbtar both missing >files when you backup? > >//dumbo/cds

Re: Samba problems

2000-10-03 Thread Alec Smith
Doing what you suggested seems to have cleared everything up. The extra tidbit to get the permissions more "correct" is also appreciated and reflected in my updated smb.conf. Thanks for the info. Alec On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:39:12PM -0400, Alec Smith

Re: Samba problems

2000-10-03 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:39:12PM -0400, Alec Smith wrote: > I'm noticing that if I copy some files from Windows NT onto my Samba > server I end up with the wrong permissions. Instead of files being owned > by alec.mp3 as I'd like, they appear to be owned by root.mp3. > > 97153 drwxr-sr-x2

Re: Samba problems

2000-10-03 Thread Alec Smith
Your Samba machine does have a [Printers] share, right? If that share is there, I'm not sure what's wrong. I'm by no means a Samba god... :( On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Alberto Pereira wrote: > Yes, > the samba is rigth configured but the printer not appears in the windows > net box!! > :( > All other

Re: Samba problems

2000-10-03 Thread Alberto Pereira
Yes, the samba is rigth configured but the printer not appears in the windows net box!! :( All others folders appears in the net windows box. On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Alec Smith wrote: Can the Windows machine see other shares on the Samba machine? On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Alberto Pereira wrote: > The p

Re: Samba problems (fwd)

2000-10-03 Thread Alberto Pereira
The problem is the windows system not found the printers! I use potato with samba2.0.7-3 On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Alec Smith wrote: I use the default Samba printers share, and then the standard method of mapping the network printers on my Windows machine. There's nothing special to printing from Wind

Re: samba problems (rather Access programmers)

2000-09-01 Thread Christoph Simon
> At 08:57 PM 8/31/00 -0300, you wrote: > > > seen as P: . Summarize : \\SERVER\SOLTSYS has to be mapped as P: and > > > \\SERVER\SOLTSYS\ACCDOC has to be mapped as E: . The rules from our > > > smb.conf are included. Please help me set up the directory structure and > > > shares that the users can

Re: samba problems (rather Access programmers)

2000-09-01 Thread C. Falconer
At 08:57 PM 8/31/00 -0300, you wrote: > the stupid Access programers > coded the path into code statically. So the program search the dbm files > at \\SERVER\\ACCDOC and more he has to "map" the "network drive" under E: > . But the ACCDOC is under a folder SOLTSYS. So the structure is > Solts

Re: samba problems (rather Access programmers)

2000-08-31 Thread Christoph Simon
> I have a friend who wants to get rid of NT and change to linux+Samba but > we have "minor" problems. The first is : the stupid Access programers > coded the path into code statically. So the program search the dbm files > at \\SERVER\\ACCDOC and more he has to "map" the "network drive" under E: >

RE: samba problems

2000-08-03 Thread CHEONG, Shu Yang \[Patrick\]
OK here goes "cd" to "/etc/network" and "ls" to see whether you already have a file there named "interfaces". If not, use you favourite editor (mine's ae, BTW as it is so ealy to use for simple editing) and create this file with the following contents:- # The loopback device iface lo inet loo

Re: samba problems

2000-08-02 Thread Phil Brutsche
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > Hi, > > hoping that someone really nice can lend a helping hand...with > configuring samba... Samba's not that hard. > 1. I always do an ifconfig eth0 <192.168.0.1> netmask < > 255.255.255.0> everytime I boot to configure my n

Re: samba problems (was: Re: Serial conn. to WIN (success!) - thanks)

1999-10-07 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Stephan Hachinger wrote: > > Hello! > > Now, the further problems: I hope perhaps someone can send me some > suggestions about this 'cause I have read the smb.conf manpage thoroughly > and don't know what to do (although I said I was probably able to solve > this). > > I'm using a ip connection

Re: Samba Problems

1999-05-31 Thread Haymo Meran
> I've had samba working on my network, allowing my nt box to see my unix home > directories. However, I had to reorganize my NT box (server) and ended up > reinstalling to free up a hd. When I did this, I changed the domain from > PRI_NT_DOMAIN to WINDOWS. I changed the appropriate line in t

Re: samba problems

1998-09-25 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
WINS maps NetBIOS names to IP addresses. When it comes time to send a packet the MAC Address is gotten through arp. NetBEUI does sit right on top of ethernet (and thus uses MAC Addresses) but this is not the same thing and Linux doesn't support NetBEUI. To complicate things, a NetBT (NetBIOS over

Re: samba problems

1998-09-25 Thread Mario Olimpio de Menezes
Hi, Maybe I didn't explain very well (poor english mine!). As I said, I have three NIC's (the linux is a masq machine). The tcp/ip part is working ok, since all my internal machines can reach internet (http,telnet,etc). In the smb.conf I added the correct ip's for all interfaces.

Re: samba problems

1998-09-24 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Ok, first of all it isn't the MacAddr that's needed, it's your IP. Now, the machines that can't reach your box, are they on the same physical network (for at least one of your ethernet cards)? samba usually only sets up one "interface" and that's the one that corresponds to the IP address which

Re: samba problems

1998-08-12 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 12:42:40AM -0700, George Bonser wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > It works (I'm using that now) but my system is internet connected > > as well, so it's not very secure. I have set "allow hosts =" to limit > > connections but do want to allow some ou

Re: samba problems

1998-08-12 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Aug 11, 1998 at 04:11:37PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > However, now 95 users have to supply their network password once, > > which is undesirable. Once entered it seems happy enough, but I would > > prefer that those users didn't have t

Re: samba problems

1998-08-11 Thread peloy
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, now 95 users have to supply their network password once, > which is undesirable. Once entered it seems happy enough, but I would > prefer that those users didn't have to enter a password. > > Any suggestions for a solution? And what about sett

Re: samba problems

1997-12-24 Thread Eloy A. Paris
Hi Hamish, is this solved already or you need help with this? You sent two messages before and in one of them you say the problem is solved, but I don't know if it is the problem in your 1st. message or the one in this message. Regards, E.- > Hi Eloy, > > I just upgraded to your latest samba p

Re: samba problems

1996-09-24 Thread Behan Webster
> > > >Domain=[workgroup] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 1.9.15p4] > I believe two or three loop bugs were found in the earlier releases > of SAMBA. The current release is 1.9.16p2, you should probably install > that release. I have been running it for a few weeks (on IRIX 5.3) and > it seems quite stabl

Re: samba problems

1996-09-24 Thread Hamish Moffatt
> About 90% of my /var/log/smb* log files are the line: > Added interface ip=192.168.1.1 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > > It seems that smbd prints this as it starts up. I just don't Possible temporary workaround: run smbd/nmbd as daemons, not from inetd. This means it'll only start u

Re: samba problems

1996-09-21 Thread Don Gaffney
On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, Behan Webster wrote: > Martin Budsj| wrote: > > > > >My /var/log/nmb* log files are a mixture of the following lines: > > > > > >more than one master browser! > > >connect error: Connection refused > > >Domain=[workgroup] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 1.9.16alpha10] > > >Domain=[wor

Re: samba problems

1996-09-20 Thread Kevin Traas
On Sat, 14 Sep 1996, Behan Webster wrote: > My /var/log/nmb* log files are a mixture of the following lines: > > more than one master browser! > connect error: Connection refused > > The first two lines about seem to be errors, but I haven't been able > to find any documentation of what they mea

Re: samba problems

1996-09-20 Thread Behan Webster
Martin Budsj| wrote: > > >My /var/log/nmb* log files are a mixture of the following lines: > > > >more than one master browser! > >connect error: Connection refused > >Domain=[workgroup] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 1.9.16alpha10] > >Domain=[workgroup] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 1.9.15p4] > > > > Looks li