Re: Samba Problem

2009-10-19 Thread Javier Barroso
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > > 16.10.2009 7:22, Tom H kirjoitti: >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Jeff Grossman  wrote: >>> >>> I just upgraded by Testing system from Samba 3.3.4-1 to 3.4.2-1 yesterday >>> and now I am not able to connect my Windows Vista mach

Re: Samba Problem

2009-10-19 Thread Jari Fredriksson
16.10.2009 7:22, Tom H kirjoitti: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote: I just upgraded by Testing system from Samba 3.3.4-1 to 3.4.2-1 yesterday and now I am not able to connect my Windows Vista machine to my Debian machine. I have tried to Google for an answer and have not

Re: Samba Problem

2009-10-15 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote: > I just upgraded by Testing system from Samba 3.3.4-1 to 3.4.2-1 yesterday > and now I am not able to connect my Windows Vista machine to my Debian > machine.  I have tried to Google for an answer and have not been able to > find anything.  Di

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

2004-05-26 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:48:57PM +0100, Randy Orrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:09:13AM +0100, Randy Orrison > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > As with most documentation, free

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

2004-05-26 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:09:13AM +0100, Randy Orrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Roberto Sanchez wrote: > >Karsten M. Self wrote: > >>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] > >>"LocalProfile"=dword:0001 > >> > >>My only question is this: is this key documented

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

2004-05-24 Thread Randy Orrison
Karsten M. Self wrote: on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:09:13AM +0100, Randy Orrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Roberto Sanchez wrote: Karsten M. Self wrote: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] "LocalProfile"=dword:0001 My only question is this: is this key documented

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

2004-05-24 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:09:13AM +0100, Randy Orrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Roberto Sanchez wrote: > >Karsten M. Self wrote: > >>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] > >>"LocalProfile"=dword:0001 > >> > >>My only question is this: is this key documented

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

2004-05-24 Thread Virgo Pärna
On Sat, 22 May 2004 10:39:34 -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Probably not documented. I doubt MS would want people to know too much > about the registry. It would make migration to competing OSs too easy. > I don't know about registry key, but in Group Policy under Administrative Templates

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

2004-05-24 Thread Randy Orrison
Roberto Sanchez wrote: Karsten M. Self wrote: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] "LocalProfile"=dword:0001 My only question is this: is this key documented somewhere, and how would one ordinarially go about getting documentation on a registry key? Probably no

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

2004-05-22 Thread Roberto Sanchez
Karsten M. Self wrote: The problem turned out to be a legacy MS Windows Registry key: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] "LocalProfile"=dword:0001 Changing that to: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] "LocalProfile"=dword:00

Re: Samba Problem

2003-12-15 Thread Haim Ashkenazi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have testing debian with samba and while the linux server is on the > network the other systems on the network lock up and freeze for several > minutes then un freeze. After I remove the debian box from the network it > does not freeze any of the other computers on th

Re: Samba Problem

2003-07-27 Thread Danthevb6man
No, change the share type to USER and make sure that your passdb backend has all the user accounts and passwords for the users you want to authenticate.  I haven't worked with Samba 3.0 yet, but from reading about it I know you don't need machine accounts unless you are trying to use Samba as a PDC

Re: Samba Problem

2003-07-23 Thread Johnny
I believe you will have to either change your share type to "share" or you will have to add the machines you want to grant access into the smbpasswd database.   - Johnny - - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:

Re: Samba Problem

2003-07-05 Thread Stephen Patterson
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 18:50:04 +0200, Manfred Hungerland wrote: > Everytime when a printjob from Windows is started i get > to the job a Page that says > User: *** ( the User ) > Host:*** ( Server ) > Class:*** ( Server ) > Job: sbmprn.*** There's probably a banner-page option in your print spooler

Re: Samba problem

2002-12-07 Thread Amal Phadke
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:19:55PM -0500, Edward Guldemond wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:45:03PM -0600, Amal Phadke wrote: > > Even after I changed the password in Linux, I still can't map the drive in > > Windows. Everything was working before I upgraded to the above version. Any > > help wi

Re: Samba problem

2002-12-07 Thread Edward Guldemond
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:45:03PM -0600, Amal Phadke wrote: > Even after I changed the password in Linux, I still can't map the drive in > Windows. Everything was working before I upgraded to the above version. Any > help will be appreciated. Did you change the password with passwd or smbpasswd?

Re: samba problem

2001-11-08 Thread Michael Heldebrant
On Thu, 2001-11-08 at 02:44, Mirek Dobsicek wrote: > yes, login and line in smbpasswd exists ... > when I test it with smbclient localhost, it works fine > > it looks for mistake on windoze side :-( > Can you please attach your "working" (security = share) and your nonworking (security = user) s

Re: samba problem

2001-11-08 Thread Mirek Dobsicek
ct: Re: samba problem > On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 09:14, Mirek Dobsicek wrote: > > Hi, > > on my Woody box I'm running Samba 2.2.2 > > when I set security = share in smb.conf, all Windows desktops around > > can easily find this server a connect. > > If I set

Re: samba problem

2001-11-07 Thread Michael Heldebrant
On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 09:14, Mirek Dobsicek wrote: > Hi, > on my Woody box I'm running Samba 2.2.2 > when I set security = share in smb.conf, all Windows desktops around > can easily find this server a connect. > If I set security = user (this is my prefered setting) then Windows desktops > cant e

Re: Samba problem with user level share permissions under Windoze

2001-09-03 Thread Guy Geens
> "Andrew" == Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> Hi, I'm trying to configure a Windoze 98 PC on my home network Andrew> to use user level share permissions instead of share level Andrew> permissions, and when I go to add users to a particular share, Andrew> Windows barfs: Do y

Re: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size

2001-06-12 Thread Hubert Palme
> "G" == Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: G> On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Hubert Palme wrote: >> > "G" == Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> G> I'm not sure if the max log size parameter makes sense when using G> --with-syslog. The parameter should probably be ignore

Re: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size

2001-06-11 Thread Gerald Carter
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Hubert Palme wrote: > > "G" == Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > G> I'm not sure if the max log size parameter makes sense when using > G> --with-syslog. The parameter should probably be ignored if syslog > G> support is enabled (via ./configure and smb.c

Re: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size

2001-06-11 Thread Hubert Palme
> "G" == Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: G> I'm not sure if the max log size parameter makes sense when using G> --with-syslog. The parameter should probably be ignored if syslog G> support is enabled (via ./configure and smb.conf) I use precompiles packages of the Debian dietr

Re: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size

2001-06-11 Thread Gerald Carter
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Hubert Palme wrote: > Hi, > > in the syslog file I repeatedly find the following messages: > > Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: [2001/06/08 08:19:40, 0] > lib/debug.c:check_log_size(311) > Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: check_log_size: open of debug file > /var/log/smb

Re: Samba Problem

2001-03-30 Thread Zac Epkes
Sorry here is MY smb.conf - ;***section global* [global] encrypt passwords = yes log file = /var/smb.log comment = overid3's File Server :) path = /samba guest ok = yes guest account = nobody workgroup = @home null passwords = True max connections = 10 ;***

Re: Samba Problem

2001-03-30 Thread Matheson Cameron
Hey, maybe you could include your smb.conf so that we could have look-see. Cameron Matheson --- Zac Epkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ive been using Debian for a bout a6months and never > seen anything like > this... I went to a lan party and when i ran TkSmb > it would find a user name > M

RE: Samba problem

2001-03-02 Thread toolus muleus
>> [2001/02/26 22:26:25, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) >> file_init: Information only: requested 1 open files, 1014 are available. This is common in my log file as well. Is it a problem? Can it be fixed? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your f

Re: Samba problem

2001-02-27 Thread jprice
Doh! That would probably explain it, then. I didn't think I needed System V IPC - guess I was wrong. :( I'll recompile tonight and see what happens... Thanks for the help. :) Jason > > > [2001/02/26 22:26:28, 0] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(566) > > Can't create or use semaphore [1]

Re: Samba problem

2001-02-27 Thread Pietro Cagnoni
> [2001/02/26 22:26:28, 0] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(566) > Can't create or use semaphore [1]. Error was Function not implemented > [2001/02/26 22:26:28, 0] locking/locking.c:locking_init(174) > ERROR: Failed to initialise share modes looks like you compiled your kernel without System V I