On Lu, 06 iun 11, 01:02:18, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 06/05/11 at 03:59pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Sb, 04 iun 11, 22:56:19, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > (I'd suggest that you give static IP addresses to your desktop
> > > machines and use the /etc/hosts file -- yes, even Windows has one -
On Du, 05 iun 11, 10:09:33, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/05/2011 07:59 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >On Sb, 04 iun 11, 22:56:19, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >>(I'd suggest that you give static IP addresses to your desktop
> >>machines and use the /etc/hosts file -- yes, even Windows has one --
> >>to gi
On 06/06/11 at 07:53am, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:02 AM, William Hopkins wrote:
> > On 06/05/11 at 03:59pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >> On Sb, 04 iun 11, 22:56:19, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> >
> >> > (I'd suggest that you give static IP addresses to your desktop
> >> > machin
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 16:03 -0400, Dan wrote:
>
> I think that sshfs is a file system oriented to the user, and NFS can
> be used for many users. NFS should be more robust if there are many
> users connected.
>
> Moreover, with sshfs each user will have to mount his folder and enter
> his passwo
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:32 PM, John A. Sullivan III
wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:51 -0400, Dan wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Simon Brandmair wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On 3/6/2011 19:50 Axel Freyn wrote:
>> >> [...
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:51 -0400, Dan wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Simon Brandmair wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 3/6/2011 19:50 Axel Freyn wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> For NFSv4 this has changed. You can use NFSv4 in different mo
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Simon Brandmair wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/6/2011 19:50 Axel Freyn wrote:
>> [...]
>>> For NFSv4 this has changed. You can use NFSv4 in different modes. The
>>> easy one has the same problem.
>
> NFSv4 is a g
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:02 AM, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 06/05/11 at 03:59pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Sb, 04 iun 11, 22:56:19, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> >
>> > (I'd suggest that you give static IP addresses to your desktop
>> > machines and use the /etc/hosts file -- yes, even Windows has one -
On 06/05/11 at 03:59pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 04 iun 11, 22:56:19, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > (I'd suggest that you give static IP addresses to your desktop
> > machines and use the /etc/hosts file -- yes, even Windows has one --
> > to give your machines permanent symbolic names. Makes
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Simon Brandmair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/6/2011 19:50 Axel Freyn wrote:
> [...]
>> For NFSv4 this has changed. You can use NFSv4 in different modes. The
>> easy one has the same problem.
NFSv4 is a giant pain in the keister, not worth the headaches. The
NFSv4 access p
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/05/2011 07:59 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>
>> On Sb, 04 iun 11, 22:56:19, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> (I'd suggest that you give static IP addresses to your desktop
>>> machines and use the /etc/hosts file -- yes, even Windows has one --
>
On 06/05/2011 07:59 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 04 iun 11, 22:56:19, Ron Johnson wrote:
(I'd suggest that you give static IP addresses to your desktop
machines and use the /etc/hosts file -- yes, even Windows has one --
to give your machines permanent symbolic names. Makes things easier
t
On Sb, 04 iun 11, 22:56:19, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> (I'd suggest that you give static IP addresses to your desktop
> machines and use the /etc/hosts file -- yes, even Windows has one --
> to give your machines permanent symbolic names. Makes things easier
> that way.)
If you're lucky the wireless
2011/6/4 John A. Sullivan III
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 15:27 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
Boy have we really digressed on this thread! If anyone objects, please
> say so and I'll spawn another one.
>
> To digress a little more...
I'm planning a network share for unison backup, some other dis
Hi,
On 3/6/2011 19:50 Axel Freyn wrote:
[...]
> For NFSv4 this has changed. You can use NFSv4 in different modes. The
> easy one has the same problem.
> However, you can switch on strong authentification (based on Kerberos),
> then it's safe (the server verifies that the client has the correct
> K
On 06/04/2011 06:21 PM, Doug wrote:
On 06/04/2011 02:53 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/04/2011 01:31 AM, Doug wrote:
[snip]
I opened the suggested url, and read the following intro: "*Reader
Prerequisites*: To get the most from this
article, understand the following concepts before reading: basic
On 06/04/11 at 07:21pm, Doug wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 02:53 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >On 06/04/2011 01:31 AM, Doug wrote:
> >[snip]
> >>I opened the suggested url, and read the following intro: "*Reader
> >>Prerequisites*: To get the most from this
> >>article, understand the following concepts befor
On 06/04/2011 02:53 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/04/2011 01:31 AM, Doug wrote:
[snip]
I opened the suggested url, and read the following intro: "*Reader
Prerequisites*: To get the most from this
article, understand the following concepts before reading: basic unix
command line tools, text editor
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 15:27 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:33 PM, John A. Sullivan III
> File ownership is a constant confusion between the two basic systems.
> *DO NOT* try to manage the same file server and accessing its material
> with the two different protocols. I'
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:33 PM, John A. Sullivan III
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 23:08 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Dan wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have two linux servers. One file server (debian) that is running
>> > samba and one application server (red
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 23:08 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Dan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have two linux servers. One file server (debian) that is running
> > samba and one application server (redhat). I would like to mount the
> > shares of the file server in the
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Doug wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 11:28 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
>>
>> On 06/03/11 at 10:02pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/03/2011 11:43 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
>>> [snip]
NFS is by far simpler to use in pure Linux environment, Samba is for
On Sb, 04 iun 11, 02:31:28, Doug wrote:
> >
> I opened the suggested url, and read the following intro: "*Reader
> Prerequisites*: To get the most from this
> article, understand the following concepts before reading: basic
> unix command line tools, text editors,
> DNS, TCP/IP, DHCP, netmask, gate
On 06/04/2011 01:31 AM, Doug wrote:
[snip]
I opened the suggested url, and read the following intro: "*Reader
Prerequisites*: To get the most from this
article, understand the following concepts before reading: basic unix
command line tools, text editors,
DNS, TCP/IP, DHCP, netmask, gateway"
I'm
On 06/04/2011 01:10 AM, Doug wrote:
On 06/04/2011 01:55 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/04/2011 12:48 AM, Doug wrote:
[snip]
No, I don't have a network up. As I said, I really don't know anything
about networks. What I want is not only file sharing,
but the ability to use the Win 7 machine as a p
On 06/04/2011 02:00 AM, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/04/11 at 01:48am, Doug wrote:
On 06/04/2011 01:30 AM, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/04/11 at 12:58am, Doug wrote:
On 06/03/2011 11:28 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/03/11 at 10:02pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/03/2011 11:43 AM, John A. Sull
On 06/04/2011 01:55 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/04/2011 12:48 AM, Doug wrote:
[snip]
No, I don't have a network up. As I said, I really don't know anything
about networks. What I want is not only file sharing,
but the ability to use the Win 7 machine as a print server. (Linux is
not fit to be
On 06/04/11 at 01:48am, Doug wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 01:30 AM, William Hopkins wrote:
> >On 06/04/11 at 12:58am, Doug wrote:
> >>On 06/03/2011 11:28 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
> >>>On 06/03/11 at 10:02pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 11:43 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> [snip]
> >>>
On 06/04/2011 12:48 AM, Doug wrote:
[snip]
No, I don't have a network up. As I said, I really don't know anything
about networks. What I want is not only file sharing,
but the ability to use the Win 7 machine as a print server. (Linux is
not fit to be a print server since it takes forever to
pri
On 06/04/2011 01:30 AM, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/04/11 at 12:58am, Doug wrote:
On 06/03/2011 11:28 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/03/11 at 10:02pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/03/2011 11:43 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
[snip]
NFS is by far simpler to use in pure Linux environment, Samba
On 06/04/11 at 12:58am, Doug wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 11:28 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
> >On 06/03/11 at 10:02pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>On 06/03/2011 11:43 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >>>NFS is by far simpler to use in pure Linux environment, Samba is for
> >>>Windows networks. NFS
On 06/03/2011 11:28 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/03/11 at 10:02pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/03/2011 11:43 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
[snip]
NFS is by far simpler to use in pure Linux environment, Samba is for
Windows networks. NFS has no passwords, just install it with apt-get,
and dec
On 06/03/11 at 10:02pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 11:43 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> >NFS is by far simpler to use in pure Linux environment, Samba is for
> >Windows networks. NFS has no passwords, just install it with apt-get,
> >and declare /etc/exports in the server, a
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Dan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two linux servers. One file server (debian) that is running
> samba and one application server (redhat). I would like to mount the
> shares of the file server in the application server. The problem is
> that the usernames are very differ
On 06/03/2011 11:43 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
[snip]
NFS is by far simpler to use in pure Linux environment, Samba is for
Windows networks. NFS has no passwords, just install it with apt-get,
and declare /etc/exports in the server, and mount the shares in the
clients /etc/fstab. That's all
-
>> > > From: "Jari Fredriksson"
>> > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2011 11:58:15 AM
>> > > Subject: Re: Samba or NFS
>> > >
>> > > 3.6.2011 18:08, Dan kirjoitti:
>> >
: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2011 11:58:15 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Samba or NFS
> > >
> > > 3.6.2011 18:08, Dan kirjoitti:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have two linux servers. One file server (debian
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:17:35PM -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 06/03/11 at 12:43pm, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Jari Fredriksson"
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2011 11:5
On 06/03/11 at 12:43pm, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jari Fredriksson"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2011 11:58:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Samba or NFS
>
> 3.6.2011 18:08, Dan kirjoitti:
> > Hi,
&
- Original Message -
From: "Jari Fredriksson"
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, June 3, 2011 11:58:15 AM
Subject: Re: Samba or NFS
3.6.2011 18:08, Dan kirjoitti:
> Hi,
>
> I have two linux servers. One file server (debian) that is running
> samba and
3.6.2011 18:08, Dan kirjoitti:
> Hi,
>
> I have two linux servers. One file server (debian) that is running
> samba and one application server (redhat). I would like to mount the
> shares of the file server in the application server. The problem is
> that the usernames are very different. Samba is
At 12:11 PM 11/27/00 +0100, you wrote:
DG> I was wondering what would be better to use in this situation.
DG> I want to basically be able to have read access to a particular LAN device
DG> on which the files are on a NT server and the client(s) that I want to be
DG> able to read files (mostly spr
Hello Debian,
Saturday, November 25, 2000, 8:52:22 PM, you wrote:
DG> Hey Guys,
DG> I was wondering what would be better to use in this situation.
DG> I want to basically be able to have read access to a particular LAN device
DG> on which the files are on a NT server and the client(s) that I want
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 05:01:29PM -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
> Thank you for the reply.
> So samba is the only way to "mount" an NT filesystem? Sounds good...
> Do I need to run a samba server on the linux machine or would the server
> be an application on the NT machine. I went to samba.org/samba
You do not need to run a samba server to mount filesystems on your Linux
box from NT via samba
At 17:01 2000-11-25 -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
Thank you for the reply.
So samba is the only way to "mount" an NT filesystem? Sounds good...
Do I need to run a samba server on the linux machine or wo
There is some NFS products for NT
At 16:37 2000-11-25 -0500, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
Hi,
AFAIK if the files are on an NT server your only option is samba,
although if you really wanted to get weird you could use appletalk
wich both NT and GNU/Linux (via netatalk) can speak
-Jon
--
To UNSUB
Thank you for the reply.
So samba is the only way to "mount" an NT filesystem? Sounds good...
Do I need to run a samba server on the linux machine or would the server
be an application on the NT machine. I went to samba.org/samba to read the
FAQs and I'm still a little confused as to what I do to g
Hi,
AFAIK if the files are on an NT server your only option is samba,
although if you really wanted to get weird you could use appletalk
wich both NT and GNU/Linux (via netatalk) can speak
-Jon
48 matches
Mail list logo
