Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 11-03-2017 09:35, Johann Spies wrote:
>> Is there not a better way to mount spyker's home directory on my laptop?
>>
>
> If you can access it via ssh, you can try sshfs.
>
There's also NFS, which I find to be a little more tolerant of me :).
--
|_|O|_| Registered
On 11 Mar 2017 2:45 PM, "Eduardo M KALINOWSKI"
wrote:
On 11-03-2017 09:35, Johann Spies wrote:
> Is there not a better way to mount spyker's home directory on my laptop?
>
If you can access it via ssh, you can try sshfs.
Thanks. I forgot about that. I did use it at work about 8 years ago.
Reg
On 11-03-2017 09:35, Johann Spies wrote:
> Is there not a better way to mount spyker's home directory on my laptop?
>
If you can access it via ssh, you can try sshfs.
--
We just joined the civil hair patrol!
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 21:54 -0500, Josh Battles wrote:
> David Clymer said:
> > Please remember to reply to the list, not to the individual. I
> > will reply on-list so that everyone can (hopefully) benefit
> > from our exchange.
>
> Sorry about that.
>
> > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 08:42 -0500, Josh
David Clymer said:
> Please remember to reply to the list, not to the individual. I
> will reply on-list so that everyone can (hopefully) benefit
> from our exchange.
Sorry about that.
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 08:42 -0500, Josh Battles wrote:
>> David Clymer said:
>>
>> > When you say that you can
Please remember to reply to the list, not to the individual. I
will reply on-list so that everyone can (hopefully) benefit
from our exchange.
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 08:42 -0500, Josh Battles wrote:
> David Clymer said:
>
> > When you say that you can't log on, do you mean that your
> > username/p
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 15:12 -0500, Josh Battles wrote:
> I'm having a few problems setting up samba on my server and I was hoping that
> the list would be able to shed some light on my issue for me and point me in
> the right direction.
>
> I've installed all the required pieces of samba and start
On Saturday 09 July 2005 12:12 pm, Josh Battles wrote:
> I'm having a few problems setting up samba on my server and I was
> hoping that the list would be able to shed some light on my issue for
> me and point me in the right direction.
>
> I've installed all the required pieces of samba and starte
Josh Battles wrote:
obey pam restrictions = yes
Is PAM correctly configured? Have you tried it without PAM?
I don't use it myself, so I won't be of much help if you need
that option.
As for setup tips, from the looks of your smb.conf it seems
you are not using SWAT, and have started from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 07:25:26PM +0800, Terence Ng wrote:
> smbclient -L knight(myhostname)
>
> but the computer output:
> bash: smbclient: command not found
apt-get install smbclient
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :pr
Lourens replying to Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snipped]
>
> I suppose this has nothing to do with Debain, but what does it
> mean to be a Primary Domain Controler? And does that apply to
> Win98 and WinME machines or only W2K/XP/NT machines?
Some may ar
On Tue 31 Dec 2002 07:33:26 +(-0800), Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> Also, when I followed the instructions for setting up CUPS for printing
> trying to print from Windows to linux asked for a password. Password for
> what user??
>
> This is what I finally setup for my printer to allow access:
>
>
Quoting Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I suppose this has nothing to do with Debain, but what does it mean to be
a Primary Domain Controler? And does that apply to Win98 and WinME
machines or only W2K/XP/NT machines?
In a networked environment using WinNT, 2K, XP Pro (and perhaps 9
Quoting Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I suppose this has nothing to do with Debain, but what does it mean to be
> a Primary Domain Controler? And does that apply to Win98 and WinME
> machines or only W2K/XP/NT machines?
>
>
This will help setup control for your network.
This applies to a
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> Quoting Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Is it possible (and is it recommended) to move to security = user on my
> > home LAN when the Windows machines don't really have a password? I guess
> > what I'm asking is how best to setup Samba and
Quoting Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Is it possible (and is it recommended) to move to security = user on my
> home LAN when the Windows machines don't really have a password? I guess
> what I'm asking is how best to setup Samba and the Windows machines I'm
> running. And, more importan
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 07:33:26 -0800 (PST)
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've read many Samba HOWTOs but I always have trouble -- and never really
> sure if I have it right.
>
> On my home LAN I have two Windows machines (Win98 and WinME). Neither are
> setup with passwords -- well
Quoth C. Falconer,
> I have a dozen win95b machines using an old pentium as a samba server -
> rocks seriously hard considering the budget was $100 NZ, and that was spend
> on the O'Reilly book "Samba". I thoroughly recommend it to you.
FWIW, The O'Reilly Samba book is available in html form f
At 08:59 PM 10/24/00 +0200, you wrote:
Does anyone know if it is possible to replace a Windows NT domain controler
by a samba server so that a newly installed client system creates its entry
in the domain automatically? I think MS works that way, doesn't it?
Kinda - it depends on your clients m
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Walter Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 3:23 AM
> To: Debian ListServer (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: RE: Samba Setup
>
> Hello
>
> I setup and got Samba working with a Win95 m
Walter Williams wrote:
> The thing I never did figure out how to do was to
> access the windows shares from Linux. This was
> because my wife started whining about how since
> I setup a network that it was slowing down her
> computer.
If the Windoze box is called winbox and the shared drive is C
access the windows shares from Linux. This was
because my wife started whining about how since
I setup a network that it was slowing down her
computer.
Well I hope this helps
Walt in Colorado
-Original Message-
From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 06 July, 2000 12:12
Jay Kelly wrote:
>
> Hello All,
> I thought I would take a crack at Samba so I installed Samba. Now
> what do I need to do for my window98 clients to log in to samba? What
> change to my network setting will I need to make? Will my Primary Network
> Login be Microsoft Family or Client for Microsof
Hi Jay,
Well, to install nmap do `apt-get install nmap`
Might as well get it, it as a good tool.
But from that lynx error it sounds like there is something
wrong with SWAT.
What version of Debian are you using?
Perhaps `apt-get remove samba` then `apt-get update` then
`apt-get install samba`
Jay Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I notice when I go into /etc there isnt a file named smb.conf. Does that
> mean that samba is not installed or do I need to create the file myself?
On Debian it's in /etc/samba. "locate", "find" and "dpkg -S" are your
friends!
Gary
Subject: Re: Samba Setup
Odd.. I don't have netscape 4.x installed, but the newest mozilla.
I installed swat to test it out ( I am on woody ), hmm.. do you have
nmap installed? sending the output of `nmap localhost` might help,
just to ensure that SWAT is running on port 901.
Hmm, the "B
16, 2000 12:27 AM
To: Jay Kelly
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Samba Setup
Odd.. I don't have netscape 4.x installed, but the newest mozilla.
I installed swat to test it out ( I am on woody ), hmm.. do you have
nmap installed? sending the output of `nmap localhost` might help,
scape and I get a error of
> Network Error: Broken Pipe???
> Cant seem to still connect. I have swat in my /etc services and in
> inetd.conf. Any Idea's
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 7:18 PM
> To: deb
PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Samba Setup
Hi Jay,
I assume you are trying to configure samba through SWAT..
( I like using the manpage and editing smb.conf,
but that's me :)
Is SWAT in your /etc/inetd NOT commented out ( without a
# in front of it ), is inetd running,
Hi Jay,
I assume you are trying to configure samba through SWAT..
( I like using the manpage and editing smb.conf,
but that's me :)
Is SWAT in your /etc/inetd NOT commented out ( without a
# in front of it ), is inetd running, which port are you
trying to connect to?
Thanks,
Rob
Namodn
On
30 matches
Mail list logo
