Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-08 Thread Dima
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> "Dima" == Dima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> As you state, disk space is now pretty cheap. That's not an >>> excuse to wantonly waste disk a la Microsoft, but symlinks >>> aren't exactly huge. > >Dima> Which is even worse, in a s

Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-07 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "Dima" == Dima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> As you state, disk space is now pretty cheap. That's not an >> excuse to wantonly waste disk a la Microsoft, but symlinks >> aren't exactly huge. Dima> Which is even worse, in a sense -- they waste a whole disk Dima> block e

Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-07 Thread Raymond A. Ingles
On 7 Apr 1997, Alair Pereira do Lago wrote: > " Raymond A. Ingles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Installed packages go to a specific place in the file hierarchy, e.g. > > "/usr/packages//". There's "/usr/packages//lib/", > > "/usr/packages//bin/", etc. A script then makes symlinks from, say,

Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-07 Thread Dima
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: ... >>Ok, the alternative is that the script uses the information provided >>inside the package, which is precisely what we have now [...] > > With the exception that the package doesn't muck with the rest of the >filesystem directly. It has to go through a

Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-07 Thread Raymond A. Ingles
On Sun, 6 Apr 1997, Dima wrote: >... >Aint that simple -- the standard debian-provided script released >yesterday has to know how to handle a new package I will release >tomorrow. [...] Well, actually, my description wasn't entirely complete. The idea is, you have a set of directories that speci

Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-07 Thread Raymond A. Ingles
On Sat, 5 Apr 1997, John Foster wrote: >I see a couple of problems: > >From a users perspective the clourisation option for ls will be close to >useless, as almost everything under /usr will be pale blue. Unless you use "ls -L". Not to be pedantic (honest!), but from the man page: --- -L

Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-07 Thread Alair Pereira do Lago
" Raymond A. Ingles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Installed packages go to a specific place in the file hierarchy, e.g. > "/usr/packages//". There's "/usr/packages//lib/", > "/usr/packages//bin/", etc. A script then makes symlinks from, say, > "/usr/lib/" to "/usr/packages//lib/". What about pe

Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-05 Thread Dima
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > ... > If we use the "/usr/packages/*" method, though, we can separate >installation into two steps. The maintainer supplies normal install >scripts that handles everything under "/usr/packages//". >It runs as, say, user "tool", group "bin". After that's f

Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-04 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, May I remind people that Debian does not depend on any de-install scripts written by package developers, which could have bugs and throw the whole system into chaos (which is just one of the reasons behind the desire to have a secure package installation). So, deinstallatio

Re: Safer package installation

1997-04-04 Thread John Foster
I see a couple of problems: >From a users perspective the clourisation option for ls will be close to useless, as almost everything under /usr will be pale blue. I think that ls will have to be modified to set the colour based on the links source - but then how do you identify the symlinks that yo