Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

2002-03-16 Thread Greg Norris
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:03:03PM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > Set cipher to blowfish (or none, if you're running it over trusted > network), remove compression. Debian's ssh package is compiled without support for cipher=none. You can rebuild it if you really want that, of course...

Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

2002-03-16 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
* Adam Majer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:17:28PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote: > > > Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from > > > stable -> testing, ssh'ing in takes massively long

Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

2002-03-16 Thread Adam Majer
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:17:28PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote: > > Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from > > stable -> testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than before? > > > > ssh2 is more computationally in

Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

2002-03-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote: > Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from > stable -> testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than before? > ssh2 is more computationally intensive.

Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

2002-03-15 Thread Christian Jaeger
I'm wondering too why ssh2 takes much longer to build a connection. On recent machines it takes only about 2-3 seconds, but that's still slow, esp. for things like tkcvs, and slow connections make it worse. chj.

RE: SSH 2 slower than 1?

2002-03-15 Thread Costa, Todd \(DMH\)
Title: RE: SSH 2 slower than 1? JC, If you don't get a reasonable answer here. Maybe trying the OpenSSH list might help. Might be a good place to ask there too. From what I see from posts there they answer fairly quickly like debian-user does. Later, Todd > -Original

Re: ssh 2 for Potato?

2001-03-26 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
RS> Of course, there's probably a package around that would be alot easier. Yep. By the way, I think that on a Potato system it would be better to link SSL statically so as to avoid confusion between SSL versions. Juliusz

RE: ssh 2 for Potato?

2001-03-22 Thread Ross Smith
> From: Juliusz Chroboczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Anyone got a trusted source for a packaged ssh 2 for Potato? Try: #!/bin/sh # openssl.sh # http://www.openssl.org/source/ VER=0.9.6 APP=openssl DIR=$APP-$VER FILE=$APP.tar.gz URL=http://www.openssl.org/source/$FILE if [ ! -f

Re: SSH 2

1999-08-04 Thread Nathan Duehr
It's available in potato/non-US I believe. I just tried searching for it with the bot on the #debian irc channel and it couldn't find it. Since it can only search the US mirrors, and since I have seen it before, it must be a non-US package. On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Rune Linding Raun wrote: > i need

Re: SSH 2

1999-08-03 Thread Mark Wagnon
Rune Linding Raun wrote: > > i need SSH2 daemon on my system does it excist as a .deb? Take a look at http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/non-us/ssh2.html -- __ _ Mark Wagnon Debian GNU/ -o) / / (_)__ __ __ Chula Vista, CA

Re: SSH 2

1999-04-22 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 21:00:35 +1000, Jiri Baum wrote: > where can I find ssh 2, please? ftp://ftp.cs.hut.fi/pub/ssh/ It's license is more restrictive than SSH1's; noone has so far volunteered to package it. Unlike SSH1's protocol, SSH2's can be implemented in free software. If you are interes

Re: SSH 2

1999-04-22 Thread Ookhoi
> where can I find ssh 2, please? ftp.cs.hut.fi Groetjes, Ookhoi