On 2/6/2013 3:48 PM, David Guntner wrote:
Jerry Stuckle grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
What I said was the server doesn't accept authentication. And yes, I
have seen many servers which don't allow it from trusted sources. They
include localhost, but a large number also accept from designated
s
Jerry Stuckle grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> What I said was the server doesn't accept authentication. And yes, I
> have seen many servers which don't allow it from trusted sources. They
> include localhost, but a large number also accept from designated
> servers (where authentication has al
On 2/6/2013 1:22 PM, David Guntner wrote:
Jerry Stuckle grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 2/6/2013 12:32 PM, rodrigo tavares wrote:
Hello !
I try sent a email via web, come this errors.
I searched for many sites, but i not found
I have postfix, cyrus and LDAP included.
# When sent mail for fir
Jerry Stuckle grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On 2/6/2013 12:32 PM, rodrigo tavares wrote:
>> Hello !
>>
>> I try sent a email via web, come this errors.
>> I searched for many sites, but i not found
>> I have postfix, cyrus and LDAP included.
>>
>> # When sent mail for firefox
>> Auhentication fai
On 2/6/2013 12:32 PM, rodrigo tavares wrote:
Hello !
I try sent a email via web, come this errors.
I searched for many sites, but i not found
I have postfix, cyrus and LDAP included.
# When sent mail for firefox
Auhentication failure [SMTP: SMTP server does not support authentication
(code: 250
rodrigo tavares grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I try sent a email via web, come this errors.
> I searched for many sites, but i not found
>
> I have postfix, cyrus and LDAP included.
>
>
> # When sent mail for firefox
>
> Auhentication failure [SMTP: SMTP server does not support a
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 07:38:09PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > anecdotal support of exim
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet smtpauth.earthlink.net 25
> > > Trying 207.69.189.206...
> > > Connected to smtpauth.earthlink.net.
> > > Escape char
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > anecdotal support of exim
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet smtpauth.earthlink.net 25
> > Trying 207.69.189.206...
> > Connected to smtpauth.earthlink.net.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
> > 220-elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net ESMTP Exim 4.34 #1 Sat, 2
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:23:42AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > 220-elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net ESMTP Exim 4.34 #1 Sat, 20
> > Jan 2007 18:17:24 -0500
>
> In that case, Earthlink's retarded postmasters need to be shot, their
> Challenge-Response system ri
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:42:27PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Grok Mogger wrote:
>>
>> > Hope no one minds if I hijack this thread. =)
>>
>> It's best to start a new one; better luck next time. :o)
>>
>> I prefer exim myself. It's relatively straightforward
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 05:35:10PM +0200, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> That's a matter of personal preference. Even though I am a
> fan myself I think configuring postfix is much easier for
> the new user. Advanced users have should no trouble
> changing it to whatever they need.
I only have my own ex
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:42:27PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Grok Mogger wrote:
>
> > Hope no one minds if I hijack this thread. =)
>
> It's best to start a new one; better luck next time. :o)
>
> I prefer exim myself. It's relatively straightforward and exim4-doc is
> excellent. If only
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I find postfix's configuration is almost sendmailesque in how arcane the
> configuration was at the time I tried it last year, but some people seem to
> like it and it appears to stay within the RFCs so it can't be all bad.
I think "can't be all bad" is r
Grok Mogger wrote:
> Hope no one minds if I hijack this thread. =)
It's best to start a new one; better luck next time. :o)
> I just read through all the responses and was surprised to see
> three people using postfix, one using exim4, and none using
> sendmail.
>
> I've heard so much about s
on Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:11:22AM + Clive Menzies mumbled:
> In short, I share Greg's enthusiasm for exim4
>
I have a fondness for exim4 as well, but now I'm playing with SELinux
in Debian, and exim4 does not want to play nice there. Postfix has
been a pleasant surprise to me in it's flexi
On (17/01/07 15:29), Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 00:08 -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
> > Hope no one minds if I hijack this thread. =)
> >
> > I just read through all the responses and was surprised to see
> > three people using postfix, one using exim4, and none using
> > sendmail.
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 00:08 -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
> Hope no one minds if I hijack this thread. =)
>
> I just read through all the responses and was surprised to see
> three people using postfix, one using exim4, and none using
> sendmail.
>
> I've heard so much about sendmail that I though
Mihira Fernando wrote:
On 1/17/07, Grok Mogger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hope no one minds if I hijack this thread. =)
I just read through all the responses and was surprised to see
three people using postfix, one using exim4, and none using
sendmail.
I've heard so much about sendmail that I
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:03:04 +
Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:16:39AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Making postfix the default is on the wish-list for etch release:
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/EtchTODOList
>
> I'm not sure who put it there (and ther
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:16:39AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Making postfix the default is on the wish-list for etch release:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/EtchTODOList
I'm not sure who put it there (and there's no url to a
discussion, making me suspect it was "J Random Postfix
Fan"), but I'd b
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:22:41 -0500
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the current default from Debian etch is exim4, so at least a lot of
> DD's feel this is good for most user, at least if you dont have
Making postfix the default is on the wish-list for etch release:
http://wiki.debian.org
On 1/17/07, Grok Mogger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hope no one minds if I hijack this thread. =)
I just read through all the responses and was surprised to see
three people using postfix, one using exim4, and none using
sendmail.
I've heard so much about sendmail that I thought it was the de
f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:08:13AM -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
> Hope no one minds if I hijack this thread. =)
>
> I just read through all the responses and was surprised to see
> three people using postfix, one using exim4, and none using
> sendmail
Hope no one minds if I hijack this thread. =)
I just read through all the responses and was surprised to see
three people using postfix, one using exim4, and none using
sendmail.
I've heard so much about sendmail that I thought it was the de
facto standard. I considered exim4 "that other M
Thanks for all information. I have installed postfix and fortunately
have good resources about setting up such server. I think the best way
is to set up such server rather than finding another mail server since
almost all of them have limits.
Paul Johnson wrote:
Please don't quote in rever
Please don't quote in reverse order.
http://wiki.ursine.ca/Best_Online_Quoting_Practices
Danesh Daroui wrote:
> Thanks. I am newbie in Mail Servers. I thought that postfix is usually
> used to set up a pop3 server and therefore a domain should be set up
> using bind. Is it possible to just use it
Please don't quote in reverse order.
http://wiki.ursine.ca/Best_Online_Quoting_Practices
Danesh Daroui wrote:
> Well, I have planned to send via my server at home with permanent IP
> address.
Thanks to SORBS and other lists that think blacklisting entire ranges
instead of actual spam source IPs,
Danesh Daroui wrote:
> I am looking for a SMTP server program to install on Debian. The reason
> is that we have to send lots of emails (news letters and not spams) to
> list of our users, but our web hosting SMTP server has a limit like all
> others to prevent sending spams. So, I think the probl
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:30:03PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:13:37 +0100
> Danesh Daroui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, I have planned to send via my server at home with permanent IP
> > address. Is it still possible to sent message being filtered at the
> > d
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 05:59:57PM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> Thanks. I am newbie in Mail Servers. I thought that postfix is usually
> used to set up a pop3 server and therefore a domain should be set up
> using bind. Is it possible to just use it as SMTP server for simple
> outgoing mails?
>
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:13:37 +0100
Danesh Daroui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I have planned to send via my server at home with permanent IP
> address. Is it still possible to sent message being filtered at the
> destination as spam? The solution to ask out host to increase their
> limit
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for a SMTP server program to install on Debian. The reason
> is that we have to send lots of emails (news letters and not spams) to
> list of our users, but our web hosting SMTP server has a limit like all
> others to prevent sending spams. So, I think the problem can be
Well, I have planned to send via my server at home with permanent IP
address. Is it still possible to sent message being filtered at the
destination as spam? The solution to ask out host to increase their
limit was not successful!
Paul Cager wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking for a SMTP server p
Thanks. I am newbie in Mail Servers. I thought that postfix is usually
used to set up a pop3 server and therefore a domain should be set up
using bind. Is it possible to just use it as SMTP server for simple
outgoing mails?
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:28:53 +0100
Danesh Daro
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:28:53 +0100
Danesh Daroui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for a SMTP server program to install on Debian. The
> reason is that we have to send lots of emails (news letters and not
> spams) to list of our users, but our web hosting SMTP server has a
> l
btw i just remembered that ive reviced mails from different
mailer-deamons, that "DELIVERY FAILURE: user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] not listed in public Name &
Address Book"
Hmm while im at it. i might as well post my exim config for you guys to
read..
Suggestions, ideas, comments.. anything useful is ver
The host in this case is AOL, so its very real.. And since its such a
large host/isp its not sertain, wether or not its spamm mail adresses or
realones.
These 'someones' is not anyone that i have ever recived/mailed from/to
before.
Yeah, if i do tail -f /var/log/exim/mainlog it never stops scroll
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 07:20:58PM +0200, smurfd wrote:
| I recently read a great article on debianplanet, that was about how to
| setup a courier/exim (imap / smtp) server. Everything worked out fine,
| until after say a week.. then i heard one night, that the box started
| working like a madone.
On 8 Dec 2001, at 11:46, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello there! I would like to be an SMTP server for some friends that
> Put/change this in your /etc/exim/exim.conf
>
> host_auth_accept_relay = *
>
I think maybe you should only add the domai
Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello there! I would like to be an SMTP server for some friends that are
> in different domains, and prefferably with authentication required...
> What do I need to do??? Thanks! I already have SMTP server working for
> local users, the standard one
40 matches
Mail list logo
