Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-26 Thread Joey Hess
Uwe Dippel wrote: > This isn't all too helpful, I know. Exim in Debian is a political > decision; due to licensing. The first thing I always do to any Debian-box > is installing Postfix. Um, what? Postfix is DFSG free and included in Debian main. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digita

Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-26 Thread Haines Brown
Uwe, I find that if I revert to exim4 monolithic configuration, my e-mail works, and so I've obviously done something to the split configuration file. I'm subscribing to pkg-exim4-users and will try to resolve the issue there. Thanks. -- Haines Brown, KB1GRM -- T

Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:37:59 -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > $ hostname > teufel > > $ hostname -a > teufel Here I have: $ hostname wira $ hostname -a wira and fetchmail runs pretty well, including SSL. Why would the whole fingerprint come up if you didn't use SSL ? Have you tried telnet, then ?

Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-25 Thread Haines Brown
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:50:01 -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > >> There seems to be a problem getting my fetchmail requests being >> authenticated at the mail server. Here's what fetchmail tells me: >> ... >> fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Courier Mail Serv

Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-25 Thread John Hasler
Uwe writes: > Exim in Debian is a political decision; due to licensing. I wrote: > Not true. Uwe writes: > Maybe what I wrote is not true, but when you search the archives, the > discussion has never ceased, from 1999 onwards. One term you'll find is > that postfix was not "DFSG-free". (DFSG=Debi

Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:23:59 -0600, John Hasler wrote: >> Exim in Debian is a political decision; due to licensing. > > Not true. Maybe what I wrote is not true, but when you search the archives, the discussion has never ceased, from 1999 onwards. One term you'll find is that postfix was not "DF

Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:50:01 -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > There seems to be a problem getting my fetchmail requests being > authenticated at the mail server. Here's what fetchmail tells me: > ... > fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Courier Mail Server > fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: localhost

Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-25 Thread John Hasler
Uwe Dippel writes: > Exim in Debian is a political decision; due to licensing. Not true. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-25 Thread Haines Brown
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 19:01:12 -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > >> I've lost e-mail, and so in desperation turn to news groups. >> >> In trying to configure my exim4 to use spamassassin, I apparently messed >> up the confituration somehow. At first, all downloa

Re: SMTP error: 550 Administrative prohibition

2007-12-24 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 19:01:12 -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > I've lost e-mail, and so in desperation turn to news groups. > > In trying to configure my exim4 to use spamassassin, I apparently messed > up the confituration somehow. At first, all downloaded messages were > deleted as spam, and as I f