This is just a shot in the dark, but, ...
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I'm using rsync on "normal" Debian (6.x), on two embedded systems that run
> what look like Debian variations (DNS-321 by D-Link and Stora by Netgear) and
> on OS X.
Mac OS-X? hmm. May be a red her
[ I accidentally sent this only to Hal, I meant to send it to the
list. It seems to be my day for rsync comments. ]
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I'm using rsync on "normal" Debian (6.x), on two embedded systems that run
> what look like Debian variations (DNS-321 by D-L
> Hal Vaughan writes:
> On Aug 14, 2011, at 10:08 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
[…]
>> My guess is that using -O along with -t may reduce the number of
>> directories in the -v list.
> Thanks. I tried with -O and without it, along with -t and no -t (in
> other words all four combinations
On Aug 14, 2011, at 10:08 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> Hal Vaughan writes:
>
> […]
>
>> It's not a "must fix" but when I'm scanning output files, obviously
>> it's a LOT easier to verify everything went smoothly if I get a quick
>> and simple output than if I have to scan a long list of dire
> Hal Vaughan writes:
[…]
> It's not a "must fix" but when I'm scanning output files, obviously
> it's a LOT easier to verify everything went smoothly if I get a quick
> and simple output than if I have to scan a long list of directories.
> It'd be nice to simplify it so I can tell at a
5 matches
Mail list logo
