Paulo Santos wrote:
François TOURDE wrote:
Le 15182ième jour après Epoch, Paulo Santos écrivait:
Plus this routes:
10.0.0.0 /255.0.0.0 - 10.120.43.158 62.48.163.64/255.224.0.0 -
10.200.34.158 192.168.168.0/255.255.255.192 - 10.120.43.158
If your syntax is "ip/mask - gateway", then the second
Le 15183ième jour après Epoch,
Paulo Santos écrivait:
>> You can't have 2 gateway lines, because gateway is equiv to "route
>> default", and you can't have 2 default destinations.
>
> Ok. I'll correct that in the end of the day, since it's in production I
> can't restart the network.
You don't ne
Hello,
First of all, than you everyone for the replies.
François TOURDE wrote:
Le 15182ième jour après Epoch,
Paulo Santos écrivait:
Plus this routes:
10.0.0.0 /255.0.0.0 - 10.120.43.158
62.48.163.64/255.224.0.0 - 10.200.34.158
192.168.168.0/255.255.255.192 - 10.120.43.158
If your syn
> Paulo Santos writes:
> Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Paulo Santos writes:
>>> 192.168.168.0/255.255.255.192 - 10.120.43.158
>> The last one should probably be as follows instead:
>> 192.168.160.0/255.255.255.192 - 10.120.43.158
> Why is that?
> I tried it, though, but I get the sa
Le 15182ième jour après Epoch,
Paulo Santos écrivait:
> Hello list,
>
> We have an Asterisk PBX running on Debian with 1 NIC. We're adding a
> SIP trunk and, for that, the ISP/ITSP installed a router/gateway (I
> think that's what it is).
>
> They've told me I needed to have configuration like thi
Ivan Shmakov wrote:
Paulo Santos writes:
>> ...
192.168.168.0/255.255.255.192 - 10.120.43.158
The last one should probably be as follows instead:
192.168.160.0/255.255.255.192 - 10.120.43.158
Why is that?
I tried it, though, but I get the same behaviour.
Best regards,
Paulo
> Paulo Santos writes:
[…]
> Plus this routes:
> 10.0.0.0 /255.0.0.0 - 10.120.43.158
> 62.48.163.64/255.224.0.0 - 10.200.34.158
> 192.168.168.0/255.255.255.192 - 10.120.43.158
The last one should probably be as follows instead:
192.168.160.0/255.255.255.192 - 10.120.43.158
7 matches
Mail list logo