Re: Replying from Mutt

2004-01-09 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Thomas H. George: > I received several helpful answers to my earlier posting, set editor = > "vim in .muttrc and sent a number of replies only to find they were all > frozen with a message 'lookuo of host "Stonewall" failed in smarthost "lookup", I assume. Are you running an MTA

Re: Replying from Mutt

2004-01-09 Thread Thomas H. George
I received several helpful answers to my earlier posting, set editor = "vim in .muttrc and sent a number of replies only to find they were all frozen with a message 'lookuo of host "Stonewall" failed in smarthost router.I know nothing about a smarthost router, this never came up before. Ob

Re: Replying from Mutt

2004-01-09 Thread Monique Y. Herman
On 2004-01-09, Thomas H. George penned: > The dist-upgrade of testing appears to have altered mutt so replies > are edited with nano instead of vi. I have no aversion to learning > another editor although I was comfortable with vi but my first attempt > to reply to a message failed. I struggled t

Re: Replying from Mutt

2004-01-09 Thread Matthew Daubenspeck
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:30:04AM -0500, Lou Losee wrote: > > The dist-upgrade of testing appears to have altered mutt so replies are > > edited with nano instead of vi. I have no aversion to learning another > > editor although I was comfortable with vi but my first attempt to reply > > to a

Re: Replying from Mutt

2004-01-09 Thread Lou Losee
Tom, * Thomas H. George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-09 09:39]: > The dist-upgrade of testing appears to have altered mutt so replies are > edited with nano instead of vi. I have no aversion to learning another > editor although I was comfortable with vi but my first attempt to reply > to a me

Re: Replying from Mutt

2004-01-09 Thread R. Wood
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:32:17PM -0500, Thomas H. George imagined: > The dist-upgrade of testing appears to have altered mutt so > replies are edited with nano instead of vi. I have no > aversion to learning another editor although I was comfortable > with vi but my first attempt to reply to a m