Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-12 Thread tomas
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:08:36AM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > * From: David Wright > * Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:10:10 -0600 > > Er, there was at least one posted here within the last week: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00189.html > > That's just one that happe

Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-12 Thread peter
* From: David Wright * Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:10:10 -0600 > Er, there was at least one posted here within the last week: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00189.html > That's just one that happened to still be in my inbox. Interesting, thanks. Does the header show

Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-11 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 11 feb 20, 10:53:45, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > Thanks for challenging my claim. Without your reply I probably > wouldn't have made the test. That was certainly not my intention, so I apologize to the list for the additional traffic. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FA

Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-11 Thread David Wright
On Tue 11 Feb 2020 at 07:36:49 (-0800), pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > * From: Andrei POPESCU > * Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:43:11 +0200 > > Without In-Reply-To a mail reader has no way to which message the reply > > belongs, so it's more important than References. > > Please look at the W

Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-11 Thread David Wright
On Tue 11 Feb 2020 at 10:53:45 (-0800), pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > Now we can see the result of the test. > > Messages > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00416.html > and > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00420.html > both thread back to your reply which threads

Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-11 Thread peter
Andrei, Now we can see the result of the test. Messages https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00416.html and https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00420.html both thread back to your reply which threads back to my original message. They have the same References. 416 was i

Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-11 Thread Henning Follmann
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 07:49:42AM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > This is a deliberate 2nd copy of a message. In-Reply-To is omitted > from the header to test threading. > > Well you've proven your point. My MUA does indeed thread this in the correct order. However, what actually is your poi

Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-11 Thread peter
This is a deliberate 2nd copy of a message. In-Reply-To is omitted from the header to test threading. Andrei, * From: Andrei POPESCU * Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:43:11 +0200 > Without In-Reply-To a mail reader has no way to which message the reply > belongs, so it's more important

Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-11 Thread peter
Andrei, * From: Andrei POPESCU * Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:43:11 +0200 > Without In-Reply-To a mail reader has no way to which message the reply > belongs, so it's more important than References. Please look at the Web view of your reply. (If your mailer linkifies this URL, click

Re: Reply to a message in the Web presentation.

2020-02-10 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 10 feb 20, 10:36:18, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > Given that References includes the In-Reply-To identifier, I'm not > sure In-Reply-To is necessary for threading. Without In-Reply-To a mail reader has no way to which message the reply belongs, so it's more important than References.