On Tuesday, 27 Oct 2020 at 22:22, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> In my experience such mails are usually forwarded jokes etc, and
> another problem is that they often contain forwards of forwards
> of forwards (etc) with nested sets of attachments (as a succession
This has finally led me to find a positiv
On Wed 28 Oct 2020 at 12:45:49 (+), Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, at 03:59, David Wright wrote:
>
> > I've found those sorts of emails (loosely coupled images) are easy to
> > deal with. In mutt, for example, press v for the attachments menu,
> > and again on any multipart or mes
Joe writes:
> But I don't think we're alone. I think many Windows users also stop
> seeing ads after a while, and the bottom line is that Net adverts
> don't really work. I think it was P&G proved that a year or two ago,
> pulling most of their 'digital' advertising and seeing no significant
> drop
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, at 03:59, David Wright wrote:
> I've found those sorts of emails (loosely coupled images) are easy to
> deal with. In mutt, for example, press v for the attachments menu,
> and again on any multipart or message/rfc822 that needs opening,
> exposing the attachments within.
Age
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:35:46 +0100
wrote:
> For reference, I have a (severely restrained, no javascript [1])
> Firefox running. Just one tab open, showing just one jpeg from
> XKCD [2]).
>
> Top shows it as the (by far hungriest) memory user, with 263 MB.
> Second, third and fourth are... WebCo
On Mi, 28 oct 20, 07:12:19, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 04:35:46 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > How did we end here? How did we end up paying for the ad
> > industry's infrastrutcture, paying with our privacy, but
> > also with our real money, having to buy RAM and CP
On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 04:35:46 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> How did we end here? How did we end up paying for the ad
> industry's infrastrutcture, paying with our privacy, but
> also with our real money, having to buy RAM and CPU power
> just for their sake?
Assuming that is not a rhetori
On 2020-10-28 08:35, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
How did we end here? How did we end up paying for the ad
industry's infrastrutcture, paying with our privacy, but
also with our real money, having to buy RAM and CPU power
just for their sake?
How do we get out of here?
Good point.
Ad agencies have
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:18:40PM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
> > > >
> > > >> On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > >>> I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
> > > >>> Claws-Mail using its Dillo plugin. I'm talking about filling
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 7:00 AM Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2020-10-25 06:51:36-04, Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 6:40 AM wrote:
> >> alpine
>
> > +1
>
> It would be useful to add some information how the suggested client
> (Alpine) serves the purpose that was asked by the origi
On Tue 27 Oct 2020 at 22:22:16 (+), Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, at 21:04, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > - Use a good MUA and resign yourself to occasionally sending an
> > email to a browser. Despite your protestations of "logging
> > in", having a browser display your email req
Patrick Bartek writes:
> > >
> > >> On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > >>> I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
> > >>> Claws-Mail using its Dillo plugin. I'm talking about filling in
> > >>> forms, etc. that are part of the HTML email and sending just
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, at 21:04, Dan Ritter wrote:
> - Use a good MUA and resign yourself to occasionally sending an
> email to a browser. Despite your protestations of "logging
> in", having a browser display your email requires no such
> thing. The MUA saves the email to a file, then hands
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:23:11 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:15:46 PM Joe wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:43:43 -0400
> >
> > Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > [1]I used to read slashdot regularly, and on slashdot, the front
> > > page had a bunch of news stories a
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:23:59 -0400
> Carl Fink wrote:
>
> I don't know if there is a or not. Someone else suggested
> that. It may be javascript. Never checked email's code all that
> closely. Next time I get one of those type emails, I'll look.
>
> > I think you're
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:23:59 -0400
Carl Fink wrote:
> On 10/26/20 6:16 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 20:45:50 -0400
> > Carl Fink wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>> I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
> >>> Claw
On Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:15:46 PM Joe wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:43:43 -0400
>
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > [1]I used to read slashdot regularly, and on slashdot, the front page
> > had a bunch of news stories and a poll. The poll was written as a
> > vanilla HTML form. If you partici
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> [1]I used to read slashdot regularly, and on slashdot, the front page
> had a bunch of news stories and a poll. The poll was written as a
> vanilla HTML form. If you participated in the poll, it would send you
> to a new instance of the home page, because a form *must* load
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:43:43 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>
> [1]I used to read slashdot regularly, and on slashdot, the front page
> had a bunch of news stories and a poll. The poll was written as a
> vanilla HTML form. If you participated in the poll, it would send you
> to a new instance of
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:43:43 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:16:21PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > The ones I respond to are known to me and are legit --
> > organizations, businesses, government agencies, etc. -- that I do
> > business with. To respond, I must switch
On Sunday, 25 Oct 2020 at 10:36, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:19:28 +0200
> Teemu Likonen wrote:
>> GNU Emacs mail clients "Gnus" and "Notmuch Emacs" automatically render
>> HTML mail nicely as plain text. User can can also open HTML and other
>> MIME parts in external viewer lik
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:11:42AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> We still don't know whether
>
> - those forms are plain old HTML forms of yore with a "classical"
> SUBMIT action
> - or they are some AJAX-y abomination in which a piece of Javascript
> plays ping-pong with the server
>
> In
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:16:21PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> The ones I respond to are known to me and are legit --
> organizations, businesses, government agencies, etc. -- that I do
> business with. To respond, I must switch to a web browser, login to
> my email account (like gmail), find t
On 2020-10-27, Carl Fink wrote:
>
> Meaning no offense, I doubt it. I have been using email since before Gopher,
> and I have literally never received an HTML email with an embedded form
> (that I opened, at least). I find it hard to believe that you get many
> of them.
>
>From what I've read h
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:42:24PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[...]
> Okay. Here's a trivial one to keep it simple:
>
> Recently I went to my bank in person. A few days later I get an HTML
> email [...]
I think we won't advance unless you look into that HTML.
(If you post it here: make sure
On 10/26/20 6:16 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 20:45:50 -0400
Carl Fink wrote:
On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
Claws-Mail using its Dillo plugin. I'm talking about filling in
forms, etc. that are par
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:57:07 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
> > On 10/25/20 9:17 PM, John Hasler wrote:
> > > Carl writes:
> > > > I don't remember ever getting an emailed form that was anything
> > > > but a link to a web page.
> > > I think that may be what he means.
> >
>
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 20:45:50 -0400
Carl Fink wrote:
> On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
> > Claws-Mail using its Dillo plugin. I'm talking about filling in
> > forms, etc. that are part of the HTML email and sending j
On Mon 26 Oct 2020 at 20:48:26 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:10 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:49:05PM +, Curt wrote:
> > > On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> > > >> he is talk
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 08:48:26PM +, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:10 -0400
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > But if you're just reading this form in a FILE on your LOCAL MACHINE,
> > which is what email is, then what is /action_page.php supposed to do?
> >
>
> And if the full URL is pres
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:10 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:49:05PM +, Curt wrote:
> > On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> > >> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the
> > >>
On 2020-10-26, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020, at 13:49, Curt wrote:
>> On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> > But what would the form's Submit action be?
>
>> HTML Forms
>>
>>
>
> ... which works fine when someone is browsing a page served by some
> website's own server... as
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020, at 13:49, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > But what would the form's Submit action be?
> HTML Forms
>
>
... which works fine when someone is browsing a page served by some
website's own server... as that partial URL points to a php file which is
part
Greg Wooledge writes:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:49:05PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> >> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the html
email.
> >> guys, ever heard of the ... html
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:49:05PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> >> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the html email.
> >> guys, ever heard of the ... html tags? that's what he means
On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
>> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the html email.
>> guys, ever heard of the ... html tags? that's what he means.
>
> But what would the form's Submit action be?
HTML F
hey,
On Monday, October 26, 2020 12:57:18 PM CET, Greg Wooledge wrote:
But what would the form's Submit action be?
no idea. and i don't care. ask him...
i am not defending his desire using forms in an email client, i am just
trying to translate what i think he wants.
but to answer your ques
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the html email.
> guys, ever heard of the ... html tags? that's what he means.
But what would the form's Submit action be?
hey,
On Monday, October 26, 2020 2:57:07 AM CET, Dan Ritter wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
I think we are all confused and the original questioner needs to
provide an example of the very strange email that they want
to work with.
really?
i think it's pretty clear what he wants:
On Monday, October
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 05:07:05PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[...]
> [...] One cannot interact and transmit data as I need to.
I think this is the core of the problem. Up to now you haven't taken
up the job to specify what that means: in the context of the Web, this
covers a broad field:
-
On 2020-10-26 00:07, Patrick Bartek wrote:
I have Dillo configured NOT to show images initially. Do that for
security. Reloading page usually brings them up. It will follow some
links to other pages, but for viewing purposes only. One cannot
interact and transmit data as I need to. I have to us
Patrick Bartek writes:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 14:07:00 -0500
> John Hasler wrote:
>
> > Patrick Bartek writes:
> > > But I need to view the entire email: images, graphics, etc. and be
> > > able to interact with all the links, etc. and not just view them.
> > > Want to get away from having to logi
Carl Fink wrote:
> On 10/25/20 9:17 PM, John Hasler wrote:
> > Carl writes:
> > > I don't remember ever getting an emailed form that was anything but a
> > > link to a web page.
> > I think that may be what he means.
>
> Can't be. He refers to having to log into a mail account
> in the browser. T
On 10/25/20 9:17 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Carl writes:
I don't remember ever getting an emailed form that was anything but a
link to a web page.
I think that may be what he means.
Can't be. He refers to having to log into a mail account
in the browser. That is never required for these mailed
li
Carl writes:
> I don't remember ever getting an emailed form that was anything but a
> link to a web page.
I think that may be what he means.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
Claws-Mail using its Dillo plugin. I'm talking about filling in forms,
etc. that are part of the HTML email and sending just the data without
"replying" in the normal sense. This is beyo
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 14:07:00 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
> > But I need to view the entire email: images, graphics, etc. and be
> > able to interact with all the links, etc. and not just view them.
> > Want to get away from having to login to the mail account with a
> > brow
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 11:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
didier gaumet wrote:
> Le dimanche 25 octobre 2020 à 19:00:08 UTC+1, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
>
> > Already have Dillo set up, but I need more than a viewer. I want a
> > client that handles HTML as well as plain text emails, so I don't
> > have to login
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 20:31:16 +
"Jeremy Nicoll" wrote:
> I think there's a difference between a mail which has an html copy of
> plain text, where images etc that might be required for the html page
> can be fetched from servers - in that case a browser will be able to
> display the page we
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020, at 20:18, Charles Curley wrote:
> Indeed, same as claws-mail. M. Bartek is using claws-mail now, and
> wants to get away from it because he doesn't want to log in to the mail
> account? I'm not following, either.
I think there's a difference between a mail which has an html
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 14:07:00 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
> > But I need to view the entire email: images, graphics, etc. and be
> > able to interact with all the links, etc. and not just view them.
> > Want to get away from having to login to the mail account with a
> > brow
> Any suggestions?
Surprisingly, Gnus handle very well HTML emails.
Sincerely, Gnus fan Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _和合團結_ 감사합니다_^))//
Patrick Bartek writes:
> But I need to view the entire email: images, graphics, etc. and be
> able to interact with all the links, etc. and not just view them.
> Want to get away from having to login to the mail account with a
> browser to do so. So, EMACS won't work for me.
Log in to what mail a
Le dimanche 25 octobre 2020 à 19:00:08 UTC+1, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> Already have Dillo set up, but I need more than a viewer. I want a
> client that handles HTML as well as plain text emails, so I don't have
> to login into the mail account via a browser to interact with the email.
I just
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 13:10:04 +0100
Michael wrote:
> On Sunday, October 25, 2020 1:04:00 AM CEST, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > Any suggestions?
>
> since this is a debian user mailinglist, my answer will be slightly
> off topic.
>
> but i use 'trojita' (https://trojita.flaska.net) as a pure
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 01:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
didier gaumet wrote:
> Le dimanche 25 octobre 2020 à 01:10:06 UTC+2, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > Hi! All,
> >
> > Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that
> > will handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have
> >
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:19:28 +0200
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2020-10-24 16:04:00-07, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> > handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
> > using Claws-Mail for years and before i
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 05:55:02 +0100
Oliver Schoede wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 16:04:00 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> >
> >Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> >handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
> >using Claws-Mail for year
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 21:52:54 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 24 October 2020 19:04:00 Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > Hi! All,
> >
> > Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> > handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
> > using Claws-
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:50:14 -0500
Leslie Rhorer wrote:
> On 10/24/2020 6:04 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > Hi! All,
> >
> > Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> > handle HTML as well as plain text
>
> I want to know that, myself.
>
> > deal with G
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 17:22:35 +1100
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On 25/10/20 12:52 pm, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Both Thunderbird and Balsa have been rejected as T'bird is a
> > behemoth and no longer in development;
>
>
> Um. Why then am I getting new versions every few weeks?
> Currently 83
On Sun 25 Oct 2020 at 07:47:33 (+), Ed wrote:
> On 2020-10-24 19:35-0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > Any suggestions?
> >
> > mutt, with a mailcap that includes:
>
> +1 for mutt.
>
> > X-Message-Flag: Cannot contact reaper.nsa.gov. Trying bucket.cia.gov..
> > X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Prat
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Ed wrote:
> > On 2020-10-24 19:35-0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > mutt, with a mailcap that includes:
> >
> > +1 for mutt.
> >
> > > X-Message-Flag: Cannot contact reaper.nsa.gov. Trying bucket.cia.gov..
> > > X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
> >
> > Thanks for the laug
Ed wrote:
> On 2020-10-24 19:35-0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > Any suggestions?
> >
> > mutt, with a mailcap that includes:
>
> +1 for mutt.
>
> > X-Message-Flag: Cannot contact reaper.nsa.gov. Trying bucket.cia.gov..
> > X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
>
> Thanks for the laugh :) but
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 08:34:52AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Teemu Likonen writes:
> > GNU Emacs mail clients "Gnus" and "Notmuch Emacs" automatically render
> > HTML mail nicely as plain text. User can can also open HTML and other
> > MIME parts in external viewer like web browser.
>
> I thoug
Teemu Likonen writes:
> GNU Emacs mail clients "Gnus" and "Notmuch Emacs" automatically render
> HTML mail nicely as plain text. User can can also open HTML and other
> MIME parts in external viewer like web browser.
I thought of suggesting Gnus as well, but that usually results in
horrified outc
On Sunday, October 25, 2020 1:04:00 AM CEST, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Any suggestions?
since this is a debian user mailinglist, my answer will be slightly off
topic.
but i use 'trojita' (https://trojita.flaska.net) as a pure and simple imap
based email client. but it is not in the debian rep
On 2020-10-25 01:51-0700, didier gaumet wrote:
> It seems that in the past, Debian provided the claws-mail-fancy-plugin
> package (a GTK2 HTML viewer).
> That is no longer the case but Debian is now providing the
> claws-mail-dillo-viewer (a Dillo HTML viewer), and in addition to this, from
> B
* 2020-10-25 06:51:36-04, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 6:40 AM wrote:
>> alpine
> +1
It would be useful to add some information how the suggested client
(Alpine) serves the purpose that was asked by the original poster.
--
/// Teemu Likonen - .-.. https://www.iki.fi/tlikonen/
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 6:40 AM wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2020, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > Any suggestions?
>
> alpine
>
+1
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Any suggestions?
alpine
Le dimanche 25 octobre 2020 à 01:10:06 UTC+2, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> Hi! All,
>
> Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
> using Claws-Mail for years and before it Sylpheed. Claws used to have
[...]
> > Any suggestions?
>
> Have you looked at protonmail.com? Encrypted all over the place. Web based,
> though.
Original poster was asking for a client, not for a service.
Much less for a commercial service.
And he clearly stated *not* web based.
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Descriptio
On 2020-10-24 19:35-0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Any suggestions?
>
> mutt, with a mailcap that includes:
+1 for mutt.
> X-Message-Flag: Cannot contact reaper.nsa.gov. Trying bucket.cia.gov..
> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Thanks for the laugh :) but not sure which client you're usin
On 25/10/20 12:52 pm, Gene Heskett wrote:
Both Thunderbird and Balsa have been rejected as T'bird is a behemoth
and no longer in development;
Um. Why then am I getting new versions every few weeks?
Currently 83.0a1. Sure it's bigger than claws, but many processes are
easier in day to da
* 2020-10-24 16:04:00-07, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
> using Claws-Mail for years and before it Sylpheed.
GNU Emacs mail clients "Gnus" and "Notmuch Emacs" autom
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 16:04:00 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
>Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
>handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
>using Claws-Mail for years and before it Sylpheed. Claws used to have
>a basic HTML plugin render
Both Thunderbird and Balsa have been rejected as T'bird is a behemoth
and no longer in development;
Thunderbird has been spun off from Mozilla, and is actively being
developed. The thing is still pretty fat, but they recently added
support for PGP/GPG encryption built-in. I wouldn't outrigh
On Saturday 24 October 2020 19:04:00 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Hi! All,
>
> Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
> using Claws-Mail for years and before it Sylpheed. Claws used to have
> a basic HT
On 10/24/2020 6:04 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hi! All,
Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
handle HTML as well as plain text
I want to know that, myself.
deal with GNOME-systemd, etc. dependencies. (I don't run GNOME anyway,
only a window manager Open
Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Hi! All,
>
> Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
> using Claws-Mail for years and before it Sylpheed. Claws used to have
> a basic HTML plugin renderer which was suff
81 matches
Mail list logo
