On 12/05/15 17:34, Mis Ntmurth wrote:
> Ok thanks
> I will contact debian
They don't participate in Internet censorship either.
--
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)
I haven't lost my mind...
...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
On 15 May 2015, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 at 07:35 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> >> Since we're well off-topic already, I can't resist citing a rather
> >> similar and increasingly prevalent negative usage that ma
On 05/12/2015 10:34 AM, Mis Ntmurth wrote:
Ok thanks
I will contact debian
regards
You're also good to contact
GMAne
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/385152/match=problem+installing+gplflash
Marc Info:
http://marc.info/?l=debian-user&m=127780632904466
Google:
https://groups.goo
On 05/15/2015 at 07:35 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>> Since we're well off-topic already, I can't resist citing a rather
>> similar and increasingly prevalent negative usage that makes no
>> sense. I quite often read the phrase:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 11 May 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> > I hear that a _lot_. But I am hearing it more and more in cases
> > like this above where only the negative makes sense. When it is written,
> > some are, I am sure, typos.
On 11 May 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
[snip]
> I hear that a _lot_. But I am hearing it more and more in cases
> like this above where only the negative makes sense. When it is written,
> some are, I am sure, typos. But I am equally sure that soemtimes when I
> understand the positive the ne
Ok thanks
I will contact debian
regards
2015-05-11 22:45 GMT+02:00 Jochen Spieker :
> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
>
> Mis Ntmurth:
> >
> > Can you please remove the page where my name appears, at this page,
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/06/msg02062.html
> > t
On Monday 11 May 2015 22:30:13 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Monday 11 May 2015 21:45:33 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> >> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
> >
> > This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I take it to mean
>
John Hasler:
> Jochen Spieker wrote:
>> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
>
> Lisi Reisz writes:
>> This is a modern usage that I find very confusing.
>
> I assume that it is a mistake and that Jochen intended to write "Cc'ed
> to OP since I not am sure (s)he is subscribed"
Yes,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 11 May 2015 21:45:33 Jochen Spieker wrote:
>> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
>
> This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I take it to mean what I
> would phrase "Cc'ed to OP since I am NOT sure (s)he is s
Jochen Spieker wrote:
> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
Lisi Reisz writes:
> This is a modern usage that I find very confusing.
I assume that it is a mistake and that Jochen intended to write "Cc'ed
to OP since I not am sure (s)he is subscribed"
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.
On Monday 11 May 2015 21:45:33 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I take it to mean what I
would phrase "Cc'ed to OP since I am NOT sure (s)he is subscribed", ( or "am
sure (s)he is NOT subscribed") since
[Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
Mis Ntmurth:
>
> Can you please remove the page where my name appears, at this page,
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/06/msg02062.html
> this subject is very old and have no answer and no interest now.
It appears you do not really under
13 matches
Mail list logo
