-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
>Gavin Hamill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Listar also has a lovely web-configuration frontend so lusers who can't
>> figure out how to use a -request admin address can adjust their settings
>
>Is it better
Gavin Hamill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Listar also has a lovely web-configuration frontend so lusers who can't
> figure out how to use a -request admin address can adjust their settings
Is it better than mailman's web frontend? Considering that mailman
lusers still can't seem to unsubscribe
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:30:18 BST, Gavin Hamill writes:
>On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Robert Waldner wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:03:19 +0200, Joakim Nordlander writes:
>> > The mailing list is currently using Majordomo, but I'm thinking of moving
>> >to Smartlist.
>>
>> Try listar. Fast, flexible a
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Robert Waldner wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:03:19 +0200, Joakim Nordlander writes:
> > The mailing list is currently using Majordomo, but I'm thinking of moving
> >to Smartlist.
>
> Try listar. Fast, flexible and with a _very_ helpful mailing list.
Listar also has a lovely
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:03:19 +0200, Joakim Nordlander writes:
> The mailing list is currently using Majordomo, but I'm thinking of moving
>to Smartlist.
Try listar. Fast, flexible and with a _very_ helpful mailing list.
cheers,
&rw
--
-- C'mon, which [luser] is it, standard or metric? I'd say
JN> If I gather correctly Smail was once the recommended or the standard mail
JN> processing software with Debian. But as of version 2.1 Smail was dropped
JN> from Debian due to some serious bugs or something like that.
JN> I decided to stay with Smail for a little longer as I knew Smail pretty
6 matches
Mail list logo
