Bob wrote:
> Does ISC DHCP remember it's self assigned "static mapping" between reboots?
Yes. The daemon writes information into the dhcpd.leases file with
information about every lease assigned before it assigns it. This
guarentees that the file has enough information to restart. It
ensures th
On Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:42:31 +0300,
Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > A flat file for 16 million users would be a little unwieldy whereas
> > an RDBMS wouldn't have a problem.
> Do you really want to use only one dhcpd for 16 millions users ? You
> might run into big big problems, when it crash
2010/12/30 Bob :
> A flat file for 16 million users would be a little unwieldy whereas an RDBMS
> wouldn't have a problem.
Do you really want to use only one dhcpd for 16 millions users ? You
might run into big big problems, when it crashes :)
--
Eero
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-
On 12/30/2010 05:05 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Bob wrote:
I've been thinking about a similar problem& what I'd like to do
would possibly require the DHCP server use a database back-end
instead of a flat file.
I am sure you mean a relational database. The ISC dhcpd already has a
database on the ba
Bob wrote:
> I've been thinking about a similar problem & what I'd like to do
> would possibly require the DHCP server use a database back-end
> instead of a flat file.
I am sure you mean a relational database. The ISC dhcpd already has a
database on the back end. It just isn't a relational data
On 12/30/2010 09:05 AM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Hi all!
I have a network of over a hundred machines in which we are using a DHCP
server on Debian GNU/Linux Lenny. But the dhcpd.conf file is monolithic
and unwieldy.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
I've been thinking about a similar problem
On Wed December 29 2010 19:42:35 Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> The idea of having static IP was that they were easily identifiable if
> they were conducting suspicious activity (for example an indiscriminate
> use of bandwidth). Simplifying the configuration of DHCP server, what
> other tools can make th
On Wednesday, 29 December 2010 18:38:51 -0800,
Mike Bird wrote:
> > Sorry. I forgot to comment that they are all static IPs for better
> > control of workstations accessing the network.
> Hi Daniel,
Hi, Mike.
> You may be doing a lot of work that is not providing any security.
>
> If someone c
On Wed December 29 2010 18:12:21 Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Sorry. I forgot to comment that they are all static IPs for better
> control of workstations accessing the network.
Hi Daniel,
You may be doing a lot of work that is not providing any security.
If someone connects an unauthorized workstati
Hi, Mike.
On Wednesday, 29 December 2010 17:42:02 -0800,
Mike Bird wrote:
> > I have a network of over a hundred machines in which we are using a
> > DHCP server on Debian GNU/Linux Lenny. But the dhcpd.conf file is
> > monolithic and unwieldy.
> Are you specifying static IPs for every box, and
On Wed December 29 2010 17:05:38 Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I have a network of over a hundred machines in which we are using a DHCP
> server on Debian GNU/Linux Lenny. But the dhcpd.conf file is monolithic
> and unwieldy.
Are you specifying static IPs for every box, and do you need to?
I've got a c
11 matches
Mail list logo
