Re: Re: StarOffice

2001-04-02 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:39:07PM +0200, Robert Voigt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >I don't think so as Staroffice is not a free or open source software > >and Sun does not give the sources > > Star Office is GPL. StarOffice, that bloated stuck pig of an office suite, is *not* GPL. OpenOff

Re: Re: StarOffice

2001-04-02 Thread John Galt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Jimmy Richards wrote: >Hello, > > Sorry, but it seems as if I detect a contradiction here. I believe you > are >correct in stating that StarOffice is not free nor OpenSource software, >therefore StarOffice CANNOT be released

Re: Re: StarOffice

2001-04-02 Thread Jimmy Richards
Hello, Sorry, but it seems as if I detect a contradiction here. I believe you are correct in stating that StarOffice is not free nor OpenSource software, therefore StarOffice CANNOT be released under the GPL(GNU General Public License) as you stated that it is here. I just wanted to cl

Re: Re: StarOffice

2001-04-02 Thread Robert Voigt
>I don't think so as Staroffice is not a free or open source software >and Sun does not give the sources Star Office is GPL. I just don't think there will be a package maintainer for such a monster package. Just today I learned they have 180 people working on it. That's why it's so big and slo

Re: [Re: StarOffice 5.1a]

2000-02-29 Thread Sherab Puntsok
Hi, Many thanks to "Eric G. Miller" and "Karsten M.Self" for your lightning reply. Thank you. Alan Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMa