On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:50:23AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Looks like a bug in /usr/share/doc/grub2-splashimages/README where it
> says to run update-grub, that should be update-grub2.
Arrrgh ... I see that:
fischer:~# less /usr/sbin/update-grub2
#!/bin/sh -e
exec update-grub
Sorry abou
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:17:51PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sun,24.Jan.10, 14:22:22, Nima Azarbayjany wrote:
> > I was able to achieve the desired resolution of 1280x800 (equivalent
> > to, I think, 0x361) by manually editing grub.cfg but the grub menu
> > does not show correctly. It only
On Sun,24.Jan.10, 14:22:22, Nima Azarbayjany wrote:
> I was able to achieve the desired resolution of 1280x800 (equivalent
> to, I think, 0x361) by manually editing grub.cfg but the grub menu
> does not show correctly. It only fills the left top quarter of the
> screen and parts of it cannot be se
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 05:52:22AM EST, Nima Azarbayjany wrote:
> I was able to achieve the desired resolution of 1280x800 (equivalent
> to, I think, 0x361) by manually editing grub.cfg but the grub menu
> does not show correctly. It only fills the left top quarter of the
> screen and parts of
I was able to achieve the desired resolution of 1280x800 (equivalent to,
I think, 0x361) by manually editing grub.cfg but the grub menu does not
show correctly. It only fills the left top quarter of the screen and
parts of it cannot be seen. The rest was fine (the boot up of linux I
mean) wit
5 matches
Mail list logo
