Jerry Stuckle:
But just the fact there are people who consider systemd to be
> problematic enough to consider forking Debian should not be ignored.
Denis Roio already has dyne:bolic.
*
http://homepage.ntlworld.com./jonathan.deboynepollard/FGA/run-scripts-and-service-units-side-by-side.html
Laurent Bigonville:
The systemd umbrella project is made of 10+ different executables
> that have all a specific scope (systemd PID1 used to manage the life
> cycles of the daemons, systemd-logind manage the user sessions,
> systemd-journald a logging system,...) and that are all
> communicatin
Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis:
A quick search reveals the following.
>
> I've a software that use libuuid. Until now, the uuidd had the
> ability to start on-demand the uuidd if the later, quotting "...
> setuid to an unprivileged user (e.g. uuidd:uuidd)".
>
> After that commit, i'm forced to use sy
Christian Seiler:
Finally: Upstart also supports socket activation. It's not quite as
> powerful as systemd's, but is has enough features for this use case.
> I don't know the people developing util-linux, but I could imagine
> them accepting a patch to also support Upstart-style socket
> activ
On Thu 23 Oct 2014 at 04:29:59 -0700, Rusi Mody wrote:
> Well I also seem to have systemd-shim installed.
> So I am confused... How all this adds up...
In its maintainer's words:
systemd-shim expresses no preference for init system, and is completely
coinstallable with systemd-sysv - and shoul
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 4:40:04 PM UTC+5:30, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 23 Oct 2014 at 00:44:29 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > As penitence for being mean to Steve I've just written
> > https://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#systemd
> Regarding
>
>apt-get install sysvinit-core systemd-s
On Thu 23 Oct 2014 at 00:44:29 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> As penitence for being mean to Steve I've just written
> https://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#systemd
Regarding
apt-get install sysvinit-core systemd-shim systemd-sysv-
The command
apt-get install sysvinit-core systemd-s
On Mi, 22 oct 14, 20:07:06, Rusi Mody wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrei for that.
> Some suggestions hopefully not too contentious :-)
Constructive feedback is always welcome :)
> 1. "Some packages may depend on systemd" should probably be linked to
>some mention of gnome. [My hunch is that gnome is
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:20:05 AM UTC+5:30, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 22 oct 14, 23:26:15, Christian Seiler wrote:
>
> [snip excelent explanations]
>
> As penitence for being mean to Steve I've just written
> https://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#systemd
Thanks Andrei for that.
WOW! Thank you again! :-D
On 22 October 2014 19:26, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > OMFG! Just did an upgrade and guess what?! A "new" packaged appeared,
> > called: "libsystemd0"...
> > [...]
> > I can not believe my eyes... BSD stuff depending on systemd!
>
> The bsdutils package is actually not
On Mi, 22 oct 14, 23:26:15, Christian Seiler wrote:
[snip excelent explanations]
As penitence for being mean to Steve I've just written
https://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#systemd
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users an
> OMFG! Just did an upgrade and guess what?! A "new" packaged appeared,
> called: "libsystemd0"...
> [...]
> I can not believe my eyes... BSD stuff depending on systemd!
The bsdutils package is actually not directly from BSD, it's built as
part of util-linux, and provides utilities not specified i
12 matches
Mail list logo
