Re: Re: Re: Chat servers

2003-01-05 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 06:37:34AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > rack off. > > Dean McEwan, If the drugs don't work, [sarcasm] take more...[/sarcasm]. Oh, crap, don't start this *again*. Also, your mailer is *still* broken. Please don't tell me you're posting to lkml from your WebTV... -ro

Re: Re: Chat servers

2003-01-04 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 12:30:35AM -0600, Nathan Poznick wrote: > Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > if liz has soggy trousers did she pee herself? > > > > Dean McEwan, If the drugs don't work, [sarcasm] take more...[/sarcasm]. > > Amazing, I'd told procmail to send all his linux-kernel garbage to

Re: Re: Chat servers

2003-01-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:31:05AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > if liz has soggy trousers did she pee herself? How amusing. It must be great to have the charm and wit of a 12-year-old. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Re: Chat servers

2003-01-03 Thread Nathan Poznick
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > if liz has soggy trousers did she pee herself? > > Dean McEwan, If the drugs don't work, [sarcasm] take more...[/sarcasm]. Amazing, I'd told procmail to send all his linux-kernel garbage to /dev/null, but who'd have thought I'd have to do the same for debian-user?