> > I'm still learning here, and from what I understand I need to do
> >
> > mdadm --assemble --scan
> >
> > to get the /dev/md[x] to appear in my unstable installation (see
> > my setup in the first post), and then I can safely
You need the auto flag, either in mdadm.conf or on the command line
Please don't top post.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 01:59:20PM -0800, Land Haj wrote:
> Thank you for this reply!
>
> I'm still learning here, and from what I understand I need to do
>
> mdadm --assemble --scan
>
> to get the /dev/md[x] to appear in my unstable installation (see my setup in
> the f
Thank you for this reply!
I'm still learning here, and from what I understand I need to do
mdadm --assemble --scan
to get the /dev/md[x] to appear in my unstable installation (see my setup in
the first post), and then I can safely
mount /dev/md2 /mnt/raid
cp -a /mnt/raid/anything .
umount /mnt
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:41:59AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 02:26:01AM -0800, Land Haj wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I decided to try etch out and use raid-1. All went fine until I mounted one
> > of the raid disks from another debian installation on the same computer,
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 02:26:01AM -0800, Land Haj wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I decided to try etch out and use raid-1. All went fine until I mounted one
> of the raid disks from another debian installation on the same computer, to
> copy a library. My set up looks like this:
>
> sda ---> / in a sid inst
aphro wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> hazels >Is it at all possible this could be a kernel compiler issue? I built
> the kernel with
> hazels >the latest gcc, which is 2.95.2-3.
> hazels >
> hazels >If no answer by Friday I'll go to to the vger kernel list.
>
> ouch!!!
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Salman Ahmed wrote:
ssahme >Are you saying that SMP kernels should not be compiled with a gcc other
ssahme >than version 2.7.2.3 ?
im just echoing the people on the list, linus, alan, and others..thats
what they say..i had big probs with kernels (SMP) that was compiled with
2
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
hazels >Is it at all possible this could be a kernel compiler issue? I built
the kernel with
hazels >the latest gcc, which is 2.95.2-3.
hazels >
hazels >If no answer by Friday I'll go to to the vger kernel list.
ouch!!! dont ever ever ever ever ever
Is it at all possible this could be a kernel compiler issue? I built the
kernel with
the latest gcc, which is 2.95.2-3.
If no answer by Friday I'll go to to the vger kernel list.
Adam C Powell wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> About two months ago, I built 2.2.12 with SMP and RAID 5 for my
> dual-Celero
9 matches
Mail list logo
