RE: RTL8139 Full Duplex with a non-modular kernel

2004-06-28 Thread Gerard Sharpe
... R GS -Original Message- From: Micha Feigin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 29 June 2004 6:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RTL8139 Full Duplex with a non-modular kernel On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:36:01AM +1000, Gerard Sharpe wrote: > >Hi, I am after some advic

Re: RTL8139 Full Duplex with a non-modular kernel

2004-06-28 Thread Micha Feigin
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:36:01AM +1000, Gerard Sharpe wrote: > >Hi, I am after some advice for setting a RTL8139 NIC to 100MB full duplex on a > non-modular kernel. > > >I can do this with a modular kernel, but am not sure how to go about it on a > monolithic kernel. The mii-tool >

Re: rtl8139.c compile problem

2002-11-28 Thread Elizabeth Barham
"Anita Chawla Hasija" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I am trying to compile a linux driver module out of your rtl8139.c = > source for my rtl8139 based cardbus NIC, but cannot succeed. > The compile fails and giving error "pcmcia/driver_ops.h : no = > such file or directory. " I

Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139 too

2001-12-09 Thread Geoff Beaumont
On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 12:09, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:56:57PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to know which of these drivers works better for people in > > kernel 2.2.x. > > > > Reason: one of them may be enabled as the default driver in the

Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139 too

2001-12-09 Thread Jonathan Matthews
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:56:57PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know which of these drivers works better for people in > kernel 2.2.x. > > Reason: one of them may be enabled as the default driver in the next > woody installation system (boot floppies). Well, on the sam

Re: Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139 too

2001-12-08 Thread Paolo Falcone
On Saturday 08 December 2001 11:56, Eduard Bloch wrote: >Hello, > >I would like to know which of these drivers works better for people >in kernel >2.2.x. > > Reason: one of them may be enabled as the default driver in the > next woody installation system (boot floppies). Both are fine, as it st

Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139 too

2001-12-08 Thread Bob Underwood
On Saturday 08 December 2001 11:56, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know which of these drivers works better for people in > kernel 2.2.x. > > Reason: one of them may be enabled as the default driver in the next > woody installation system (boot floppies). > > Gruss/Regards, > Edua

Re: rtl8139.c - compile problems for cardbus driver module

2001-07-25 Thread Rodolfo Giometti
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 07:18:14PM +0200, Schwerzmann, Stephan wrote: > "pcmcia/driver_ops.h: no such file or directory" > in my whole /usr/src tree I do not have anything named pcmcia nor > driver_ops.h > [...] > Questions: > what steps do I miss, to get the file pcmcia/driver_ops.h built? where >

Re: rtl8139.c - compile problems for cardbus driver module

2001-07-20 Thread nico de haer
Hi, I myself compiled the carbus stuff you talked about one for my laptop. I'm writing from memory here, and thats known to be less than perfect ;P but it will point you in the right direction 1) Get the sourcecode for the PCMCIA package, and compile this on your system 2) Install the new pcm

Re: rtl8139

2001-06-08 Thread Matthias Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri Jun 08, 2001 at 09:22:58AM: > > i´ve tried to add rtl8139 within the make menuconfig dialogue to my 2.2.19 > kernel. > but it isn´t there > further i could not find a header file for the rtl8139.c file IIRC the driver is now 8139too and you need to have set: # Code

Re: rtl8139

2001-06-08 Thread Fabbione
You should enable Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers in Code maturity level options ---> menu. Then it should appear in the network device support -> eth 10/100 -> EISA, VLB, PCI and on board controllers Fabbione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > hi there, > > i´ve tried to a

Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139too (was Problems with 8139too...)

2001-04-22 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:38:42 +0200, Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >While more or less on the subject 8139, could someone please explain the >differenses between these, and what benefits one might have over the >other. I've used them both without trouble, but I asume there is a >reason w

Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139too (was Problems with 8139too...)

2001-04-18 Thread David Wright
Quoting Emil Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > While more or less on the subject 8139, could someone please explain the > differenses between these, and what benefits one might have over the > other. I've used them both without trouble, but I asume there is a > reason why 8139too was written (it's

Re: rtl8139

2001-04-01 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 01:53:11PM +0200, Tomas Nalevajko wrote: > Hi, > > could somebody plz help me with this. If I want to insert rtl8139.o or > when I run update-modules there are error messages: unresolved symbols. I > have latest debian stable version but I needed new xserver because my > RI

Re: RTL8139

2000-01-13 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, aphro wrote: : it is in there, i use it currently...enable support for i "PCI VLB and : onboard adapters" i think the option is and a new set of NICs will show : including the rtl8139. It's also necesary to choose "Y" when asked about Experimental drivers. -- Nathan Norma

Re: RTL8139

2000-01-13 Thread aphro
it is in there, i use it currently...enable support for i "PCI VLB and onboard adapters" i think the option is and a new set of NICs will show including the rtl8139. nate On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tim Nicholas wrote: tim >Hey there all, tim > tim >I have just been trying to compile a new kernel (2.2

Re: RTL8139

2000-01-13 Thread Arcady Genkin
Tim Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have just been trying to compile a new kernel (2.2.14) but i can not > find the option to add support for the rtl8139 chipset 10/100 cards. > They are reltivly common and there is documentation for them with the > source but not the option to select in

Re: rtl8139 in slink?

1999-10-22 Thread Martin Oldfield
> "Alexis" == Alexis Maldonado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexis> Hello! On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 10:42:48PM -0700, aphro Alexis> wrote: >> curious as to why there was no realtek 8139 driver included in >> slink. and it doesnt appear as an option in the kernel that >> sli

Re: rtl8139 in slink?

1999-10-21 Thread Alexis Maldonado
Hello! On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 10:42:48PM -0700, aphro wrote: > curious as to why there was no realtek 8139 driver included in slink. and > it doesnt appear as an option in the kernel that slink comes with (2.2.12 > currently -- using the CD from the new O'reilley book) even tho the > rtl8139.c f

Re: rtl8139 in slink?

1999-10-21 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, aphro wrote: : curious as to why there was no realtek 8139 driver included in slink. and : it doesnt appear as an option in the kernel that slink comes with (2.2.12 : currently -- using the CD from the new O'reilley book) even tho the : rtl8139.c file is there(it failed t

Re: rtl8139 + kernel2.2.5

1999-05-11 Thread Khalid EZZARAOUI
Frank Rosendahl wrote: > > > other question : > > after an upgrade a get this from ldconfig > > ldconfig: warning: can't open /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 (No such file > > or directory), skipping > > any idea ? > > Does this library exist with this name ? > > CU > Frank > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail

Re: rtl8139 + kernel2.2.5

1999-05-11 Thread Frank Rosendahl
Khalid EZZARAOUI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bonjour, > > I have a problem about rtl8139 (ethernet card) option in the compilation > of the kernel. > rtl8139 is in the kernel source but not available in make xconfig. > How to compil it anyway ? Did you activate "Conde maturity level options/Pr