On 12/2/24 00:02, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David Christensen
wrote:
On 12/1/24 04:27, Greg wrote:
Hi there,
I'm setting up MD-RAID0 on a top of HW-RAID6 devices (long story). I
would like to confirm the following:
1. The RAID0 chunk size should be the stripe widt
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David Christensen
wrote:
>
> On 12/1/24 04:27, Greg wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm setting up MD-RAID0 on a top of HW-RAID6 devices (long story). I
> > would like to confirm the following:
> >
> > 1. The RAID0 chunk size should be the stripe width of the
> > underl
If you're not fully sure of any of those parameters, I'd suggest ...
do some testing. E.g. if your target storage is quite large, maybe do only
2% of that, or possibly less - in total (approximate) size, but using the
presumed or being tested stripe/cluster/etc. sizes. And test the performance,
a
On 12/1/24 19:19, David Christensen wrote:
On 12/1/24 04:27, Greg wrote:
Hi there,
I'm setting up MD-RAID0 on a top of HW-RAID6 devices (long story). I
would like to confirm the following:
1. The RAID0 chunk size should be the stripe width of the
underlying RAID6 volumes.
2. The RAID0 metad
On 12/1/24 04:27, Greg wrote:
Hi there,
I'm setting up MD-RAID0 on a top of HW-RAID6 devices (long story). I
would like to confirm the following:
1. The RAID0 chunk size should be the stripe width of the
underlying RAID6 volumes.
2. The RAID0 metadata should be at the end of the device (meta
5 matches
Mail list logo
