I meant to say column 8) :D not row...
--- On Sat, 12/5/09, Tudod Ki wrote:
From: Tudod Ki
Subject: quota script :)
To: "Debian User"
Date: Saturday, December 5, 2009, 7:19 PM
How could I write a script that enables quota on that partition, what contains
a specific users home dir?
Writing t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Mike Bird wrote:
> On Fri June 13 2008 18:07:47 URNIL FGBEZ wrote:
>> There is no possible way that there are still files owned by that user
>> because i use the following way to delete that account:
>> 1. userdel 1500
>> 2. rm -rf /srv/HOMEDIR
>
On Fri June 13 2008 18:07:47 URNIL FGBEZ wrote:
> There is no possible way that there are still files owned by that user
> because i use the following way to delete that account:
> 1. userdel 1500
> 2. rm -rf /srv/HOMEDIR
Please don't top post.
What did "find" show you? There may be temp files,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Thanks for your answer.
There is no possible way that there are still files owned by that user
because i use the following way to delete that account:
1. userdel 1500
2. rm -rf /srv/HOMEDIR
King Regards
Christian Czeczil
-
That usually mea
On Fri June 13 2008 13:53:37 URNIL FGBEZ wrote:
> Hello dudes,
> After googling for 1 hour i question myself if anybody ever had that
> problem ( i found one guy in a forum but he didn't get an answer).
> Adding quota information to the quota table isn't a problem
> (E.G. quotatool -u 1500 -b -l 15
Hi Brian,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:22:41AM +, Brian Platt wrote:
> I'm having bit of a nightmare trying to get quota to work with
> directadmin and debian sarge Server is VPS /etc/fstab
> shows/dev/xvda1 / ext3 rw,noatime 0 1/dev/xvdb1 none swap defaults
> 0 0I tried adding usrquota,grp
Mike Bird wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 April 2007 11:14, Marc wrote:
>
>> repquota and quotatool do actually work:
>>
>
> Does "repquota -a" work?
yes:
*** Report for user quotas on device /dev/md2
Block grace time: 7days; Inode grace time: 7days
Block limits
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 11:14, Marc wrote:
> repquota and quotatool do actually work:
Does "repquota -a" work?
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:34:37PM +0200, Christian Pinedo Zamalloa wrote:
> hi,
>
> I use quotas in the /home directory of a Debian GNU/Linux Sarge but I'm
> having a strange behavior. I only use block limits:
>
> soft: 4000
> hard: 4500
> grace time : 7 dias
>
> When the user gets 4500 blocks
A suer should be able to type quota -v to get that.
Adding that to the shell's login would show them each time a user
logged/terminaled in.
At 04:42 PM 8/22/2005 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I went through the quota-mini-howto to install quota on out system. It
>seems to work but I
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.20.0857 +0200]:
> I cannot find any patches for 2.4.2x. Does anyone know where I can
> get them?
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. kr
Hi Marcus,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:08:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a question about quotas.. Can somebody suggest
> me a file-format version? Should I use vfsv0 or vfsold?
> What are the differences between those formats?
If you are running Woody, I strongly suggest strictly a
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:55:09PM -0400, Jeremy D. May wrote:
> serendipity:/# setquota -u kj 5 5 0 0 /dev/sda2
> serendipity:/# quota kj
> Disk quotas for user kj (uid 1001): none
>
>
> why is it setting them but then telling me that the where not set
> ??
Are you sure you have quota
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Jordi S . Bunster wrote:
> Just to be sure the actual user has user quotas? edquota -u user?
Yes. I can see all quotas set properly if I use (as root) the command
'repquota -a':
Block limits File limits
Userusedsof
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:51:20AM +1000, Tadeusz Bak wrote:
> However the command 'quota' issued by user or 'quota -u user' issued
> by root always results in:
>
> Disk quotas for user ... : none
>
> According to the manual page the output should show disk usage and set
> limits. Do you have any
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001 07:40:26 +0100, Robert Waldner writes:
>I added /dev/hdc to fstab, did `touch quota.user`, `edquota -u `
>and `quotaon /home3` (where hdc is mounted). Now every process
>accessing the drive, including quotacheck, repquota, quotaoff, umount,
>touch etc, is hanging and won´t ev
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 07:10:46PM +0700, Umum Wijoyo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd just like to ask:
> How come any of my users with a uid of 1024 (uid=1024),
> always experiences quota problems?
> Is there anything magical about the number 1024?
> (I know that 1 kb = 1024 bytes...)
> Or did I just set
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Juergen Nagler wrote:
> > I think your logic has a slight flaw. It checks to see if the mailbox IS
> > CURRENTLY over quota, not if it WILL BE over quota AFTER the mail is
> > delivered.
> >
> > In other words, mail comes in, the mailbox is checked to see if it is over
> > q
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, George Bonser wrote:
>
> I think your logic has a slight flaw. It checks to see if the mailbox IS
> CURRENTLY over quota, not if it WILL BE over quota AFTER the mail is
> delivered.
>
> In other words, mail comes in, the mailbox is checked to see if it is over
> quota. It is
At 08:17 AM 2/10/99 +0100, Juergen Nagler wrote:
>But how would you then explain this:
[snip]
>sol:forrest[~]>ll /var/spool/mail/forrest /var/spool/mail/testuser
>-rw--- 1 forrest mail55651 Feb 10 07:46 /var/spool/mail/forrest
>-rw-rw 1 forrest mail 962560 Feb 10 08:11
> I think your logic has a slight flaw. It checks to see if the mailbox IS
> CURRENTLY over quota, not if it WILL BE over quota AFTER the mail is
> delivered.
>
> In other words, mail comes in, the mailbox is checked to see if it is over
> quota. It is not so the mail is added. Then next mail arr
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Pete's mailing list account wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:
>
>
> If a user receives a mail which puts them over softquota, with as a
> local delivery agent:
>
> 1) deliver. User would receive their mail and go over softquota but with
> zero grace per
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:
> I don't think I'll hold my breath - but I will switch over to procmail to
> my MDA. Can you give me any information on setting procmail up as the
> MDA? Or is it fairly straight forward (ie. I should just read the
> sendmail man page)
I would not recommend t
IMHO quotas on /var/spool are a bad idea. They are only effective
(as you have discovered) if the user owns the file there - many processes
(news, mail, etc.) put things in spool with the ownership other than
the user who the file is for. If you do get say all the processes to put
the
file in spo
On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, Pete's mailing list account wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:
>
> > This quota works fine and enforces the limit correctly when a user
> > attempts to put any files in that filesystem via the shell - but when a
> > user recieves mail it is placed into their mail f
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:
> This quota works fine and enforces the limit correctly when a user
> attempts to put any files in that filesystem via the shell - but when a
> user recieves mail it is placed into their mail file - regardless of their
> disk quota. So affectively the mail syst
On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, G. Kapetanios wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just installed the quota utility on my system.
> I did everything by the book but when I would run quota as a user it would
> say Disk quotas for ... : None . I checked and rechecked everything but it
> didn't help. I run quotacehk
> joost witteveen wrote:
> >
> > > What on earth is wrong? I have my symlinks (asm, linux, scsi) set
> > to
> > > the kernel's include directories correctly
> >
> > Just as a side note, that isn't correct. Those to asm, linux
> > directories
> > (don't know about scsi, but probably that one too)
Tommy Lakofski wrote:
>
> Is anyone aware of a problem with the version of Quota in hamm
> currently?
> It installs with no problems from quota_1.55-8.deb, but when starting
> quota, the quotacheck command segfaults before it gets anywhere.
> usrquota
> is enabled for the partition in /etc/fstab,
joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > What on earth is wrong? I have my symlinks (asm, linux, scsi) set
> to
> > the kernel's include directories correctly
>
> Just as a side note, that isn't correct. Those to asm, linux
> directories
> (don't know about scsi, but probably that one too) are provided by
>
> What on earth is wrong? I have my symlinks (asm, linux, scsi) set to
> the kernel's include directories correctly
Just as a side note, that isn't correct. Those to asm, linux directories
(don't know about scsi, but probably that one too) are provided by
the libc*-dev package, and you shouldn't
Tommy Lakofski wrote:
>
> Is anyone aware of a problem with the version of Quota in hamm
> currently?
> It installs with no problems from quota_1.55-8.deb, but when starting
> quota, the quotacheck command segfaults before it gets anywhere.
> usrquota
> is enabled for the partition in /etc/fstab,
In your fstab, do you have quotas enabled for that filesystem? I guess
that is the first thing that comes to mind. Because users can write to
other filesystems quotaless, unless quotas are enabled on it.
Dennis
+ dpk <[EMAIL P
> Okay, its been a while since Ive done these, so bear with me. How do I do
> quotas?
>
> I have compiled the kernel for quota support.
> I have run quotacheck for the required filesystem (/home)
> Now, if I remember correctly I have to modify the fstab for the /home
> entry and add a -a (?) to
34 matches
Mail list logo
