On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 03:11:24PM -0400, Mike Dresser wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> > So ... what does 'apt-get -f install' say?
>
> And I replied to a thread that isn't mine anymore =)
>
> pellusbackup:~# apt-get -f install
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Depend
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> So ... what does 'apt-get -f install' say?
>
> --
> Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And I replied to a thread that isn't mine anymore =)
pellusbackup:~# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependen
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:02:35PM -0400, Reid Gilman wrote:
> The exact error message is:
(I think you appended this to the wrong thread, but anyway.)
> apt-get install x
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> You might want to run 'apt-
The exact error message is:
apt-get install x
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: (I've tried it)
Sorry, but the following packages have unment dependencies:
zl
[No need to cc me, I read the list.]
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:28:34PM -0400, Mike Dresser wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Um, that looks risky. Wouldn't it be safer to rebuild the lilo package
> > from woody on a potato system so that it will actually have satisfied
> > dependencies?
>
> Yes.
> Um, that looks risky. Wouldn't it be safer to rebuild the lilo package
> from woody on a potato system so that it will actually have satisfied
> dependencies?
Yes. This was done to fix a problem with drives over 32gb on an older
machine that accepted it in the bios, but lilo didn't work on.
>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:01:05PM -0400, Mike Dresser wrote:
> I'm doing the ssh updates on a potato machine here, and running into
> problems, due to having to use lilo out of woody.
>
> pellusbackup:~# apt-get install ssh
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> You
7 matches
Mail list logo
