Re: Question: I2O, and how Linux is dealing

1997-11-12 Thread Louis Larry
On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote: > On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Dan Hugo wrote: > > > I was just reading over the NDA agreement (for fun) that the I2O > > organization (http://www.i2osig.org/) makes people sign before they > > THINK about the "technology" in I2O, and I recall reading some

Re: Question: I2O, and how Linux is dealing

1997-11-12 Thread Bruce Perens
The i20 group left their specification on their anonymous FTP server and we all have a copy now. They then took it back off the server. Go figure. We have no problem with them now, there is no possible non-disclosure case and when the hardware comes out we will write drivers for it. Thanks

Re: Question: I2O, and how Linux is dealing

1997-11-12 Thread Marcus . Brinkmann
Hello! The guys from I2O left the specifications a good while on their server for anonymous ftp :) Many people that writes hardware drivers for linux should have this document, I can imagine there was a good rush on their server before they removed the access to it... I2O is neither a problem n

Re: Question: I2O, and how Linux is dealing

1997-11-12 Thread Wojciech Zabolotny
On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Dan Hugo wrote: > I was just reading over the NDA agreement (for fun) that the I2O > organization (http://www.i2osig.org/) makes people sign before they > THINK about the "technology" in I2O, and I recall reading somewhere that > the Linux community was NOT in favor of the w