On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:07:48 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 15/09/2014, Chen Wei wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> >> .xsession-errors, which is currently sitting at about 740MB, and
> >> has been growing in the last hour.
> >>
> >> entries from before the cu
On 15/09/2014, Chen Wei wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>> .xsession-errors, which is currently sitting at about 740MB, and has
>> been growing in the last hour.
>>
>> entries from before the current boot session) entries, so as to reduce
>> the file size to co
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> .xsession-errors, which is currently sitting at about 740MB, and has
> been growing in the last hour.
>
> entries from before the current boot session) entries, so as to reduce
> the file size to content that is necessary to retain for
Bret Busby writes:
> So, I believe (unttil and unless, advised otherwise) that the
> deleteing the file (which did not free up the disc space, in itself),
> and then, renaming the xsystem-errors.old file, to xsystem-errors,
> appears to have disappeared the problem, which, if I had known
> earlie
Bret Busby writes:
> I note that, with that file that is being accessed by Nautilus,
> assuming that the number 1169162 , is the size of the file, I have
> tried, but, apparently, can not reduce that to zero, as that number
> does not change, with my attempts.
On a side note: You could try nemo
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Bret Busby wrote:
On 10/09/2014, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 01:54:08AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
The file has (kind of) gone, now (it is no longer accessible, but,
appears to still exist, in the
On 10/09/2014, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu
wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 01:54:08AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>>> The file has (kind of) gone, now (it is no longer accessible, but,
>>> appears to still exist, in the ether of the unknown; still ta
On 10/09/2014, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:36:42AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>> Before seeing the above message, after someone previously saying that
>> deleting the file would not cause any (extra) problems, but would not
>> free up disc space, I deleted the file, then ran
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 01:54:08AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
The file has (kind of) gone, now (it is no longer accessible, but,
appears to still exist, in the ether of the unknown; still taking up
disc space, whilst, in theory, non-existent),
A file
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:36:42AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Before seeing the above message, after someone previously saying that
> deleting the file would not cause any (extra) problems, but would not
> free up disc space, I deleted the file, then ran "Empty Trash Can",
> but, no disc space was
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 01:54:08AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> The file has (kind of) gone, now (it is no longer accessible, but,
> appears to still exist, in the ether of the unknown; still taking up
> disc space, whilst, in theory, non-existent),
A file continues to use up disk space until all op
On 10/09/2014, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 10 Sep 2014 at 01:24:24 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>
>> Just out of interest, "top" shows the system as having been up for 21
>> days, so, the xsession-errors file grew to 743MB, in 21 days. I saw,
>> at the top of that file, before I deleted it, reference to 21
On Wed 10 Sep 2014 at 01:24:24 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Just out of interest, "top" shows the system as having been up for 21
> days, so, the xsession-errors file grew to 743MB, in 21 days. I saw,
> at the top of that file, before I deleted it, reference to 21 August,
> so, the file apparently,
On 10/09/2014, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 09/09/2014, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I am concerned that, should I simply delete the file, the system will
>>> crash or otherwise damage to the boot session, would occur.
>>
>> I
On 09/09/2014, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I am concerned that, should I simply delete the file, the system will
>> crash or otherwise damage to the boot session, would occur.
>
> I very much doubt that any such damage would
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am concerned that, should I simply delete the file, the system will
> crash or otherwise damage to the boot session, would occur.
I very much doubt that any such damage would occur by deleting it, but
the following incanta
On 09/09/14 at 03:29pm, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In trying to work out why my disk space gets progressively consumed so
> that I repeatedly run out of disc space without any known reason, in
> examining my hidden files in my home directory, I found the file
> .xsession-errors, which is curre
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:29:04PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Does some uttility or command (with switches) exist, that can purge
> the file of redundant (for example, entries over a week old, or,
> entries from before the current boot session) entries, so as to reduce
> the file size to cont
18 matches
Mail list logo
