On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 01:56:36PM -0600, Tilton wrote:
> "S.Salman Ahmed" wrote:
> >
> > I got this OEM 3Com 3c905B card and added it to my system (ABIT-BH6,
> > Celeron 300A) which already has a generic 10/100 PCI NIC that has thus
> > far been working perfectly with [EMAIL PROTECTED] service.
>
"S.Salman Ahmed" wrote:
>
> I got this OEM 3Com 3c905B card and added it to my system (ABIT-BH6,
> Celeron 300A) which already has a generic 10/100 PCI NIC that has thus
> far been working perfectly with [EMAIL PROTECTED] service.
>
> BTW, the other NIC that works fine is detected by kernel as:
>
Alson van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Before that I tried two different NICs to no avail, which leads me to
> > believe NICs may be inherently flaky. So maybe try another one (I
> > convinced my local h/w vendor to lend me this one, slightly used, and
> > I ended up buying it)
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 09:35:58AM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> FWIW I've got a working PIII/3c905b/terayon setup.
> My only initial problem with it was dyslexia: 509 is not the same as
> 905! IOW, you need to use the right driver, which in my case means
>
> alias eth0 3c59x
>
> in /etc/modu
FWIW I've got a working PIII/3c905b/terayon setup.
My only initial problem with it was dyslexia: 509 is not the same as
905! IOW, you need to use the right driver, which in my case means
alias eth0 3c59x
in /etc/modutils/aliases.
Before that I tried two different NICs to no avail, which lea
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 10:08:22AM -0500, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
>
> I got this OEM 3Com 3c905B card and added it to my system (ABIT-BH6,
> Celeron 300A) which already has a generic 10/100 PCI NIC that has thus
> far been working perfectly with [EMAIL PROTECTED] service.
>
> BTW, the other NIC tha
6 matches
Mail list logo
