On 14 Jul 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see. If you are using make modules_install, you are not
> using make-kpkg. In that case, my suggestion to you is: use make-kpkg
> from kernel-package; it really takes care of these details for
> you. You never run make modules_install.
Hi,
I see. If you are using make modules_install, you are not
using make-kpkg. In that case, my suggestion to you is: use make-kpkg
from kernel-package; it really takes care of these details for
you. You never run make modules_install.
manoj
>>"graeve" == graeve <[EMAIL PROTE
On 12 Jul 1998 06:38:33 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Manoj
Srivastava) wrote:
>Hi,
>>>"graeve" == graeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> graeve> Even with make-kpkg the modules don't end up in the right place.
>
> Could you elaborate? Where do the modules end up? Where should
> they be ending
Hi,
>>"Jaakko" == Jaakko Niemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You could use make-kpkg, I've found that it works great. What is
>> everyone's aversion to using the kernel-package anyway? There are so many
>> problems with people trying to install custom kernels without it.
Jaakko> Old habits,
Hi,
>>"graeve" == graeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
graeve> Even with make-kpkg the modules don't end up in the right place.
Could you elaborate? Where do the modules end up? Where should
they be ending up? Would it be possible to access the .deb files
produced? Have you filed a bug
>> You could use make-kpkg, I've found that it works great. What is
>> everyone's aversion to using the kernel-package anyway? There are so many
>> problems with people trying to install custom kernels without it.
Old habits, I guess. How does it work with 2.1 series, anybody ?
--j
On Tue, Jul 07, 1998 at 06:57:58AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 6 Jul 1998 20:32:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric) wrote:
>
> >You could use make-kpkg, I've found that it works great. What is
> >everyone's aversion to using the kernel-package anyway? There are so many
> >problems with p
On 6 Jul 1998 20:32:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric) wrote:
>You could use make-kpkg, I've found that it works great. What is
>everyone's aversion to using the kernel-package anyway? There are so many
>problems with people trying to install custom kernels without it.
>
Even with make-kpkg the
You could use make-kpkg, I've found that it works great. What is
everyone's aversion to using the kernel-package anyway? There are so many
problems with people trying to install custom kernels without it.
_ _
| |(_)
| _| | |
| |___ | |
|__/ |
|__/
On Mon, 6 Jul 1998 [EMAI
9 matches
Mail list logo
