Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-21 Thread Michael Legart
At 14:46 21-10-97 +0200, you wrote: >This means you get a single IP address only. The only way to make the >Windows 95 boxes access the internet is through proxys or by using >ip-masquerading. I'd suggest proxying first, when it works try the >masquerading stuff The proxy is working fine, and the

Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-21 Thread Michael Legart
At 15:10 20-10-97 -0600, you wrote: >Everything looks good to me. Can your clients just not surf? Try running >winipcfg at the Win95 clients to see if they got all of their dhcp >configuration. Allmost all the options is correct - but, the field "DNS servers" is just empty!? >Then do the diag ba

Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-21 Thread Nils Rennebarth
On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Michael Legart wrote: > Hmmm... now i'm a little confused. Nils Renebarth just told me that I have > to be running a dns server...! My isp have 2 of them... You must. But a caching only one is sufficient. > Oct 20 21:25:46 badpixel dhcpd: Copyright 1995, 1996 The Internet Soft

Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-20 Thread Al Youngwerth
At 09:57 PM 10/20/97 +0200, Michael Legart wrote: >At 11:02 20-10-97 -0600, Al Youngwerth wrote: > >>No, you don't have to be running DNS but is this a demand dial link? If so >>you may have a problem with an Win95 TCP/IP bug that can cause Win95 >>machines to query DNS when they can't find a resou

Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-20 Thread Michael Legart
At 11:02 20-10-97 -0600, Al Youngwerth wrote: >No, you don't have to be running DNS but is this a demand dial link? If so >you may have a problem with an Win95 TCP/IP bug that can cause Win95 >machines to query DNS when they can't find a resource they used to have. >The fix for this sucks: setup a

Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-20 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Al Youngwerth wrote: > > At 05:30 PM 10/19/97 +0200, Michael Legart wrote: > >Hi! > > > >I have a little problem with ip_masq. > > > >It's allmost working ... clients on the network can access hosts outside > >the LAN if they type the hosts ip instead of the domainname. I can access > >hosts via.

Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-20 Thread Nils Rennebarth
On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Michael Legart wrote: > At 08:17 20-10-97 -0600, you wrote: > > >option domain-name-servers 192.168.2.1, 205.162.184.2, 205.162.184.3; > > I think a have that line. 192.168.2.1 is your box, right? I don't need to > be running a DNS server - or? Yes. You must. > I just c

Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-20 Thread Michael Legart
Hi! At 08:17 20-10-97 -0600, you wrote: >option domain-name-servers 192.168.2.1, 205.162.184.2, 205.162.184.3; I think a have that line. 192.168.2.1 is your box, right? I don't need to be running a DNS server - or? >Also, you must have DNS enabled in the Win95 TCP/IP control panel. I just

Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-20 Thread Al Youngwerth
At 05:30 PM 10/19/97 +0200, Michael Legart wrote: >Hi! > >I have a little problem with ip_masq. > >It's allmost working ... clients on the network can access hosts outside >the LAN if they type the hosts ip instead of the domainname. I can access >hosts via. domainnames from my linux box. I use dhc

Re: Problem with dhcpd/ip_masq

1997-10-20 Thread Carey Evans
Michael Legart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's a program in win95 called winipcfg, which shows what the computer > have recived from a dhcp server. BUT in the field which should be showing > 193.162.146.9 (a dns server) is just empty... How are you setting the DNS server? The "Name Server"